Hegelian Dialectic edition

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
meme 20210308 02.jpg
20210307 book pic 07.jpg

The Saturday Night Joke

There was a power outage at my house this morning.

My PC, Laptop, TV, DVD, IPad and new surround sound music system were all shut down.

Then I discovered that my iPhone battery was dead. To top it off, it was raining so I couldn’t go for a walk, bike or run.

The garage door opener needed electricity so I couldn’t go anywhere in the car. I went to the kitchen to make coffee and then remembered this also needed power.

So I sat and talked with my wife for a few hours.

She seems like a nice person.

Conservative views of “Liberalism”

Thumbnail

This is a question asked at Quora – Liberals, what are some things you think Conservatives get wrong about your beliefs, and intentions? – and this was the sample answer provided. Remember, it is some lefty who has answered this.

Trump’s followers seem to think that anyone who does not like Trump is a Democrat and that all Democrats believe one or more of the following:

  • You want completely open borders.
  • You’re Communist.
  • You want to take everyone’s gun away.
  • You hate Christianity and are trying to destroy every church in the nation.
  • You’re just angry because Hillary Clinton lost.
  • You’re jealous of Donald Trump.
  • You hate America.
  • You just want free stuff.

“One or more” means “at least one”. I will rephrase the answer, but the list is put in a way that these people might weasel out of but the following seems about right. It only takes one of these to be true according to the “one or more” criterion.

  • You support an open borders policy and the relatively unrestricted entry of illegal aliens
  • you are economically in favour of “socialism” always bearing in mind that every socialist has a different interpretation of what “socialism” means
  • you are opposed to the market economy being the most important element in the allocation of goods and services within the community
  • you are hostile to Christianity and Christian beliefs and values
  • you are angry that a free election allowed Donald Trump to win the presidency in 2016
  • you have some kind of deep resentment against Donald Trump personally aside from the policy positions he advanced
  • you are deeply hostile to the historical values of individual rights and personal freedom associated with the United States and traditional liberalism
  • you believe in the continuous expansion of programs designed to provide goods and services to individuals paid for entirely or in large part by governments through increased tax revenues or simply by increasing the size of public debt.

If these are not part of what “Liberals” believe, I am happy to be corrected. But at the bottom of it all is an adolescent view of “fairness” that would ask the government to adjudicate between real world outcomes, and then to take from one set of citizens to give to other sets of citizens based a belief in some kind of historical wrong that has harmed such groups in the past that ought to be rectified today through a series of payments made in the present.

All this omits the deeply racist and sexist beliefs everywhere on the left who in almost every instance base policy decisions on the racial background of individuals or according to their somehow defined “gender”. Every form of “affirmative action” is based on advancing someone ahead of someone else because with aim of achieving something referred to as “equity”. Equity* is defined as “the quality of being fair and impartial” with “fair and impartial” being entirely in the eye of the beholder.

And please note that Liberalism is written with a capital-L since this modern Marxist version is entirely different from the small-l liberal values that the United States was founded on.

* Equity – The word equity is defined as “the quality of being fair or impartial; fairness; impartiality” or “something that is fair and just.”

Thumbnail

Barely alive

Taken from Joe Biden’s Handlers Let Him Out, and Things Are Not Fine. There it says:

Earlier today, the Democrats in the Senate passed their COVID “relief” bill along a party-line vote. Not even Lisa Murkowski or Mitt Romney saw fit to break ranks this time because that’s how bad this piece of legislation is. In fact, only 9% of the bill goes to direct assistance for those who have suffered at the hands of government lockdowns. The rest goes to a smattering of special interests and payoffs, from the National Endowment of the Arts to bailing out blue states that were in dire financial straits long before the pandemic hit….

Biden truly looks barely alive at this point. His skin is taut, his eyes are squinty, and he once again shows an inability to articulate even the most basic points. None of his verbal fumbles are due to any supposed stutter. Keep in mind, there’s a teleprompter feeding him lines in a massive font right in front of him. How in the world is this guy ever going to do a State of the Union address if he can’t operate for ten minutes in an environment built to prop him up?

We are always in uncharted waters, but this time we are really really in uncharted waters. Where we end up four years from now is utterly unknowable, other than the name of the woman who will become president in name only, to replace the man who is now president in name only.

BTW there is at least one economist – up, down and sideways – that does not think you need to spend the money to grow the economy. In fact, if your interest is in growing the economy, not one cent of it should be spent. Just leave it alone, and the economy will grow back by itself.

The ABC is your sworn enemy so why don’t you do something about it?

If this doesn’t finally get the Government to start defending itself, what will? The Government gives these far-left scum at the ABC free rein to say and do what they like with no consequences. Why don’t they finally, at long last, do something to make the collective at the ABC start to worry that maybe, just maybe, there might be something they might actually lose by behaving the way they do? Facebook you will stand up to but not an organisation that is your most bitter and resolute enemy, and one you fund to the tune of a billion a year.

This is from Bettina Arndt’s latest Newsletter [newsletter@bettinaarndt.com.au]. News Limited is a private sector media organisation so can bend and distort the news as they please. But the ABC is paid for by the Commonwealth down to the last paper clip. Until Andrew Bolt has a 7:00 pm weekly show on the ABC, nothing is going to change and they will keep belting you like the punch-drunk cowards you seem to be. This is what Bettina writes, among much else.

What we have just witnessed this week in Canberra was … a shameful feeding frenzy by a partisan media determined to take out Attorney General Christian Porter and hence the Federal government….

“For years now, activists have been working hard to undermine the authority of our justice system by alleging rape victims don’t receive fair treatment, that rape is rarely reported, and wrongly asserting that convictions are rare in such cases….

“That’s been the overarching theme right from the start of this latest episode in the Year of the Rape Victim. The protagonists must have been disappointed at the short run of the Higgins affair which fizzled out remarkably quickly, despite the best efforts of feminist commentators to maintain the rage. So our ABC leapt into action leaking news of the upcoming 4 Corners Program based on comments from friends of a deceased alleged victim of a historical rape by a Cabinet Minister….

“No matter that the police then announced the case was closed since there was not enough admissible evidence. And that the alleged victim had withdrawn her initial complaint before she tragically suicided. And that her poor parents had not wanted her to proceed with the complaint, warning their daughter suffered mental illness and expressing concern she might have “confected or embellished” the allegations. And that her accusations against Porter emerged after recovered memory therapy, including hypnotic techniques subject to evidentiary restrictions in Australian courts because of their potential to affect memory.”

Are you that completely blind to what is going on? If you are not for yourselves, who are you for? They will take you down if you don’t start fighting back, and that is without any doubt whatsoever their aim in all they have been doing. If you are going to go down, this is the battlefield I want you fighting on, not some absolute concocted nonsense about what a cabinet minister was doing more than thirty years ago when he was seventeen.

Voi che sapete

LIQ put up a post which featured an aria from the Barber of Seville – La Calunnia – about how slander starts as a gentle breeze but eventually, if properly attended to, becomes a roaring tornado. Min wrote an unbelievably astute comment which reads in full:

Voi che sapete

So I will put up both Voi che sapete (from The Marriage of Figaro) and then follow it with another version of La Calunnia both of which together really do capture so much of what is taking place before us. First Voi che sapete, possibly the greatest song devoted to young love ever written. Despite appearances, Cherubino is a young lad, around 15-16 years old.

And then La Calunnia about slander and its uses.

Is there more to add to the political mess that confronts us? No doubt, but this really does seem to say a very great deal about what is going on.

But if you do want more, there is this piece of “reporting” from The Australian: Unreconcilable teenage memories dealing with a story of events that occurred more than thirty years ago retold by a woman who is acknowledged to have been mentally ill, and then selectively retold again based on a series of highly salacious “recovered” memories which includes this:

 

We have moved from the gutter press into serious evil.

Lightweight posers of no substance

What an irony in finding an op-ed in The Australian on trial by media when it is The Australian that is the main media judge-jury-executioner in dealing with these unprovable allegations, especially those against the Attorney-General. Why The Oz would let this article pass into print was clear as you could wish as soon as you read the opening paras:

Grace Tame is right. The nation does seem to be on the verge of some sort of revolution. But it’s not the sort of benign change envisaged by the Australian of the year when she addressed the National Press Club on Wednesday.

The outrageous treatment of Attorney-General Christian Porter suggests we could be entering a new dark age that erodes public trust in the media and the institutions that govern society.

When this happened in America, it created the opening that gave rise to Donald Trump. That is what the lynch mob in Canberra is toying with by seeking to bypass the rule of law in their scramble to destroy Porter.

What any of this has to do with Donald Trump is well  beyond me (and that great authority on the rule of law, Grace Tame, as well for that matter). But at least we can all stand together in being against rape.

As for other matters, such as the philosophical questions related to rule of law, they are quite confusing and require quite a bit of thought and background knowledge. As also noted here, for example: Rape stalemate threat to Scott Morrison’s agenda. On matters such as the government’s agenda, it is very hard to find a consensus, even though many of these issues are crucial to our collective wellbeing. As here:

“Scott Morrison’s industrial relations bill faces months of delay as key crossbenchers call for a planned March vote on the reforms to be shelved in the wake of rape claims against Christian Porter, and backed an independent ­inquiry into the allegations.

“South Australian senator Rex Patrick said on Friday he supported an independent investigation into the allegations against Mr Porter and called for him to stand aside while the probe occurred….

“Jacqui Lambie also backed a probe into the claims against Mr Porter and said the government should drop its plans for the Senate to vote on the bill in the sitting week starting March 15.”

What a bunch of clowns we seem to have elected. Lightweight posers of no substance.

LC the Cow

How Borden Dairy Plans To Revamp Elsie The Cow | PopIcon.life

Grew up with my back fence next to the Borden’s Dairy plant in Toronto. Funny Elsie the Cow should come to mind once again all these years later (“LC”, get it?). That the country, the media and our political leaders should be distracted to such an extent by any of this is a disgrace, but this is straight out of the playbook of the left. An absolutely empty issue of no serious consequence – what two staffers were up to in Linda Reynold’s office in 2019, or even more absurdly, what took place in 1988 when the Attorney-General was seventeen. But given foreign policy is beyond most people along with economic policy and the rest of the boring agendas brought before the Parliament, this is what has been brought before us day after day in one front page after another with the sole purpose of costing the Coalition electoral support. If there is a genuine political issue anywhere in any of this, I have still to find out what it is.

And while I agree with all of those who point out that this issue, and the way it has been handled in the media, does put rule of law at risk, I think the core issue is different. We are dealing with a typical effort by the left to hijack the debate into some cul-de-sac where they can show their supposed high moral standards without having to present a single element of a genuine policy agenda. They are against men raping women. Well, so is everyone. But somehow they can present themselves as on the side of the virtuous against the non-virtuous given how slanted to the left the media has now become.

Meanwhile in America, this is what happens: The Cuomo sexual harassment claims appear to follow a disturbing pattern. This, you may be sure, is not from The New York Times, Washington Post or any other American daily with a wide mainstream readership.

Bennett’s allegation of sexual harassment by Cuomo comes on the heels of that of another former staffer, Lindsey Boylan, who published an essay last Wednesday detailing her experiences of inappropriate sexual overtures by the governor, some of them assisted by his staff. Over her several years working as a special assistant to Cuomo, Boylan says she frequently received sexual comments and invitations from the governor.

He would go out of his way to touch her on her lower back and legs. He would comment on female staffers’ weight in front of Boylan and ridicule them about their sexual relationships – a pattern consistent with the comments described by Bennett. He once asked her to play strip poker on a government plane. He had his aides email her boss to ask if she was going to be present at certain events; once, a Cuomo staffer emailed her to tell her, at Cuomo’s request, that the governor thought she looked like a woman rumored to be Cuomo’s ex-girlfriend. “He said: look up Lisa Shields,” the Cuomo aide, Stephanie Benton, wrote to Boylan. “You could be sisters. Except you’re the better looking sister.” Here, too, the governor’s suggestion was not subtle.

This, on the other hand, is what you do get in The New York Times: Examining Tara Reade’s Sexual Assault Allegation Against Joe Biden. The opening para:

Ms. Reade, a former Senate aide, has accused Mr. Biden of assaulting her in 1993 and says she told others about it. A Biden spokeswoman said the allegation is false, and former Senate office staff members do not recall such an incident.

Whether I believe Ms Reade or not is hardly the issue here. The issue is that only those who are inclined to vote for conservative candidates actually care about such matters in deciding for whom to vote. Supporters of the left use such issues only as a means to alienate voters on the right from the people who will actually support a conservative agenda. Nothing Bill Clinton ever did in relation to “that woman” lost the Democrats a single vote among his constituency.

Why don’t they release the CCTV footage?

There is actually a video of the night in question when Brittany was escorted into Parliament House which she has herself asked to see. It’s mentioned here, Brittany Higgins: Security guards ‘unlocked office’ for alleged Parliament rapist along with other things that seem to have been dropped from the way these questions are discussed at the moment.

CCTV that is continuously monitored 24 hours a day in Parliament House showed the male staffer leaving with no sign of the woman.

“Two went in, but only one came out,’’ a former security officer told news.com.au.

This is the second reason security officers returned to Senator Reynolds’ office to determine what had happened to the woman who had been brought in “falling down drunk” and barely able to sign her own name.

They found Ms Higgins disorientated and half-naked in the Defence Minister’s office, where she had been left by the male staffer who had brought her there.

Despite this, it appears there was no immediate sense from the DPS that a sexual crime may have been committed.

Release the footage and then let us judge for ourselves.

Mad, Saad and dangerous to know

From The Abyss of Infinite Lunacy by Gad Saad. We really do live in crazy times. 

The rate at which our society is sinking into madness is truly bewildering:

1) It is now racist for a white person to translate the work of a black person

2) It is now homophobic for a straight actor to play a gay character

3) It is now racist for a white therapist to treat a black client

4) It is now racist to have advanced high school programs

5) It is now transphobic for biological females to reject having to compete against trans women (biological males)

6) It is now Islamophobic to criticize any tenets of Islam

7) It is now science denialism to question the ongoing COVID lockdowns

8) It is now science denialism to question any tenets stemming from climate change alarmists

9) It is now epistemological bigotry to support the scientific method as THE means by which you adjudicate scientific hypotheses

10) It is now racist to argue that mathematics yields right and wrong answers

11) It is now racist to promote the ethos of individual dignity over collectivist identity politics

12) It is now racist to criticize a Noble Person of Color be it a famous athlete or celebrity

13) It is now transphobic to posit that only women menstruate

14) It is now racist to publicly proclaim your support for “wrong think” black individuals such as Thomas Sowell or Larry Elder

15) It is now misogynistic to note that women greatly outnumber men in universities

16) It is now sexist to publish scientific research that yields sex differences that are contrary to accepted politically correct orthodoxy

17) It is now racist to point to FBI murder stats broken down by interracial markers of victim and perpetrator

18) It is now racist to openly support national borders

19) It is now racist to seek to curb immigration from countries that espouse values that are deeply hateful and anti-liberty

20) It is now racist to not decolonize philosophy and literature departments

21) It is now racist to request that job offers be based on the merits of an individual’s dossier rather than on the use immutable traits.

Let me also add this: Has Everyone Gone Insane? Not everyone of course, not me or thee, and I’m never all that sure about thee. By Noah Rothman who writes:

Does Amazon really think that their app design could honestly be mistaken for Hitler? Does Hyatt actually believe CPAC’s stage designers embedded an obscure Nazi symbol into its program to signal an affinity for fascism—a semaphore that seems to have backfired spectacularly, seeing as only the conference’s critics got the message? Does Syracuse University really suppose that their own student [a female lacrosse player who posted a supposedly racist picture of her making an “OK” sign] is in the wrong here, and not the overwrought agitators on the Internet whose only joy in life seems to be making others miserable?

The answer to these questions would be valuable, but they are also beside the point. Whether they believe it or not, they say they do. Or, at least, they think they have no choice but to say they do.

It’s all part of being “in” and not “out”. The madder whatever it is you must say you believe the easier it is to work out who is not playing along.

Niki Savva savouring the moment

Cartoon: Johannes Leak

From Christian Porter: Scandal may yet rebound against Morrison:

Labor will not back off, nor will friends of Porter’s accuser, which means neither will journalists. It means it will remain a serious problem for the government when parliament resumes, and it means Porter’s political career is destined to end. That is the reality Porter now faces and that Morrison has to deal with.

Barely a day has passed since Brittany Higgins’s rape allegations against a Liberal staff member were made public three weeks ago without her story, or other allegations of abuse, dominating the news cycles.

A government that prides itself on its control has been thrown off course. At some point the damage will be reflected in the polls. If Coalition MPs are not troubled by the principles involved, and many of them are, that will make more of them even more apprehensive.

One of the ongoing problems for Morrison with these scandals that have engulfed his government, that have the potential to bring them all down — scandals have been known to do that — is that his explanations for his ignorance about them stretch credulity, not just with the media but among those familiar with the way government works, including the people who sit behind him.

No doubt speaking for The Australian itself. Gutter journalism at its worst.