James Murdoch, an heir to the Fox News fortune, spent $20 million opposing Donald Trump’s 2020 reelection while funneling another $100 million through a nonprofit to support leftwing political groups, according to a new report.
In all the circumstances, and given the available choices, voting for Trump was not unreasonable. Idealising him, seeing him as a cultural saviour, learning to hate all his enemies, letting something of his abusive, spiteful spirit seep into your being, that was a terrible mistake.
That is a classical statement from a journalist employed by the newspaper to present the news. There is a difference on the editorial page, where there is a range of views presented, from the astonishingly deep and readable Henry Ergas through to a number of others who are barely worth a glance at the headline put above the waste of newsprint they publish.
But as for the paper itself, it has been and remains deeply on the left and as anti-Trump as the New York Times. It was, you will recall, this same paper that supported Kevin Rudd against John Howard in the 2007 Federal election.
This is part of the tragedy of the times in which we live.
Dr. Fauci told CNN hydroxychloroquine was actually dangerous when used as a prophylactic against coronavirus. Hydroxychloroquine had been used safely for 65 years in millions of patients. And so the message was crafted that the drug is safe for its other uses, but dangerous when used for Covid-19. This statement made headlines throughout the fake new media and it was a complete lie.After Fauci’s statements on hydroxychloroquine, the tech giants began censoring any mention of the drug. The media mocked President Trump and anyone who suggested the drug was safe and effective. Doctors treating coronavirus patients were suspended from their social media accounts.And hundreds of thousands of people died.It was all based on a lie perpetrated by Dr. Anthony Fauci.
And there are a number of Chief Medical Officers here in Australia who should now be asked a number of questions. The article, which you should read in full, continues:
Now there is more information that it was not just Fauci but all of the top US medical leaders who were in on the hydroxychloroquine lie.Dr. Meryl Nass, MD, broke this story in The Defender. According to Dr. Nass, the top health officials were all in on the conspiracy against hydroxychloroquine.
And when they have finished with HCQ they can move onto Invermectin.
Thank you for your many enlightening investigations. I would love to see an investigation of the hospitals’ balance sheets prior-covid vs during-covid. It was widely rumored in my area that hospitals were paid an extra $13,000 per patient diagnosed with covid and an extra $39,000 per covid patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Is this still happening? There’s an old saying that you get more of those things that you reward…..
The study found “there is a probable link between receiving the second dose (of Pfizer) vaccine and the appearance of myocarditis among men aged 16 to 30,” it said in a statement. According to the findings, such a link was observed more among men aged 16 to 19 than in other age groups.
Absolutely denied, of course. Nor was it restricted to 16 to 19 year olds, just that there were more of them than in other age groups.
I was vaccinated on Friday. Now a voice in my ear keeps whispering: “This is Bill Gates. Buy Microsoft.” No, wait. The thought in my head is actually: Enough! There’s no excuse left for another lockdown. Let conspiracy theorists die from the virus, if that’s their choice. We’ve almost finished protecting the vulnerable, and that’s enough.
This was even the heading:
NO MORE LOCKDOWNS: LET VACCINE CONSPIRACISTS GET INFECTED
If someone is hesitant about taking an untried, untested vaccine for which no one can be sued if things go wrong it is insane and insulting to describe such concerns as “conspiracy”.
Full column here. And I notice he was hardly the first in line to show the rest of us the way. Hardly anyone has been dying from Covid for almost a year and there are alternatives to vaccination, such as HCQ and Ivermectin. Then there’s this from the comments.
Covid mortality/morbidity is incredibly unremarkable. One has a near 100% chance of surviving an infection. Over 99% of cases across the planet have made full, natural recoveries. Their immune systems have done the job and are better off for it.
And here you are, fed up like all of us about the lockdowns but falling victim it seems to the obsession with under-developed, inadequately trialled & unapproved ‘vaccines’ as a means out of this mess. Such a naive, propagandised perspective!
Yes, have your shot. They exist only to lessen the severity of your own symptoms should you get an infection. Not to protect others! But the pressure the media, the Govt. and the health industry at large are placing on Australians to get theirs is unethical at the very least! And who has to market/advertise a vaccine anyway? Doesn’t that speak volumes for the effectiveness and safety of the stuff?
Being ‘vaccine-timid’ or vaccine hesitant may just save ones life!
And many Australians favour their own healthy innate immune system over that of under-developed, unapproved drugs that have significant adverse reactions (including death). And where’s the general support for those people who aren’t as bloody vaccine obsessed as you lot!
This is an article you should read if you want to get past the wall of silence: The Drug that Cracked COVID. Dated May 1, 2021. Here is some but read the rest if you are interested in understanding the nature of the world in which you live. But be warned, it’s a long article.
An earlier Australian study, reported in the journal Antiviral Research, showed that Ivermectin, which blocked other RNA viruses like Dengue virus, yellow fever virus, Zika virus, West Nile virus, influenza, the Avian flu, and HIV1/AIDS in vitro, decimated the coronavirus in vitro, wiping out “essentially all viral material by 48 hours.” But more research was needed in human beings.
But by October Marik’s concerns were answered. The studies were well-designed university trials that showed amazing anti-COVID-19 activity at the normal doses used to treat parasites. Though small and endlessly diverse by large, Western big pharma “one-size-fits all” random control trials, the Ivermectin studies were a mosaic of hundreds of scientists and many thousands of patients in trials all over the world, all showing the same remarkable efficacy against all phases of COVID-19 no matter what dose or age or severity of the patient. “Penicillin never was randomized,” Marik says. “It just obviously worked. Ivermectin obviously works.”…
The scientific evidence was overwhelming, he said. The data from twenty-seven studies, sixteen of them randomized controlled trials, demonstrated, with highly statistically significant, overwhelmingly positive, consistent, and reproducible rates, that people who got sick with COVID-19 were far more likely to quickly get better at home when they took Ivermectin. They didn’t go to the hospital. Housemates of people with COVID-19 who took Ivermectin didn’t get infected. People who got moderately ill in hospitals didn’t go to the ICU; they got better quicker and went home faster. Hospitals didn’t get overrun. The drug even saved elderly, critically ill COVID-19 patients from dying compared to those routinely dying elsewhere. Six prevention studies showed Ivermectin reduced the risk of getting COVID-19 by 92.5 percent, superior to many vaccines. Dr. Hector Carvallo, a professor of medicine at the University of Buenos Aires, gave 788 doctors and other health care workers in three medical centers weekly Ivermectin prophylaxis, with a control group of 407 doctors and others who didn’t get the drug. In the control group 236 people, or 58 percent, “had become ill with COVID.” Among the 788 who got Ivermectin, “no infections were recorded.”
The medical establishment that has stood in the way of wide distribution of Ivermectin are no better than mass murderers.
The public health danger posed by potentially pandemic-causing viruses escaping from laboratories has become the subject of considerable discussion, spurred by “gain of function” experiments. The ostensible goal of these experiments—in which researchers manipulate already-dangerous pathogens to create or increase communicability among humans—is to develop tools to monitor the natural emergence of pandemic strains. Opponents, however, warn in a variety of recentresearchpapersthat the risk of laboratory escape of these high-consequence pathogens far outweighs any potential advance.
The virtual certainty is, however, that there are more we don’t know about. And the only reason this one has become notorious is because it could be used as a vehicle to steal the election in 2020.
Malcom X once called the media “the most powerful entity on the earth.” They have, he said, “the power to make the innocent guilty and to make the guilty innocent, and that’s power. Because they control the minds of masses”. Today, that power is now infused with the power of the world’s biggest tech and social media companies. Together social and traditional media have the power to make a medicine that has saved possibly millions of lives during the current pandemic disappear from the conversation. When it is covered, it’s almost always in a negative light. Some media organizations, including the NY Times, have even prefaced mention of the word “ivermectin” — a medicine that has done so much good over its 40-year lifespan that its creators were awarded the Nobel Prize for Medicine in 2015 — with the word “controversial.”
Read it all. Since the international efforts to obliterate HCQ as a means to deal with the Chinese Flu, even when there was no other available means to treat anyone who caught the virus, there have been many questions about what is really going on. This only adds more questions to all of the others.
The NIH gave $3.7 million in funding to a New York-based nonprofit, EcoHealth Alliance, run by British-born Dr. Peter Daszak, who then, with the approval of the NIH, gave nearly $600,000 of that money to help fund the gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute, and co-authored scientific papers with the scientist who conducted the lab’s research, China’s so-called batwoman, Shi Zhengli.
The NIH is The National Institutes of Health which is the primary agency of the American Government responsible for biomedical and public health research.