Protocol to get someone out of an ICU Covid death sentence

This is from someone else but there is no link I can provide. If this is anything like what really happens, “pressing criminal charges” may be the least of it.

Folks, I’ve been running into this in the States and have developed a protocol to get people out of ICU Jail

The Modus Operandi is always the same, so be on guard for it because it is Fauci designed and therefore designed to kill.

1)      Person goes to hospital for broken arm (example);

2)      The hospital immediately does a covid test, which comes back positive;

3)      The hospital then immediately puts the person on an IV drip with midazolam (lethal injection drug) which tranquilizes the lung and reduces 02 absorption;

4)      Patient is moved into ICU where all communication is cut-off from family and outside doctors;

5)      Remdesiivir is then added to the IV, which destroys the patient’s kidneys and causes water retention;

6)      All nourishment is cut-off and they are put on a ventilator;

7)      The patient drowns in their own fluids.

The way to break them out is as follows:

1)      Arrange an outside doctor or hospice for home care;

2)      Arrange an ALS ambulance;

3)      Call the hospital administrator and tell them that you have everything arranged for the patient to come home to die (don’t tell them you plan on saving the patient);

4)      If the hospital refuses, call the police and file a criminal complaint for: medical battery (assault under your law), medical kidnapping and false imprisonment;

5)      Tell the cops you want a health, safety and welfare check on the patient;

6)      Get your patient/family/friend home via the ALS ambulance and immediately give them the Math+ (Dr Peter McCullough protocol), get them a catheter or other way of draining fluids and feed them;

7)      Press criminal charges against the hospital and the doctors who did this.

And if you would like to see the kinds of danger we are in, read this: Antibody levels decrease after two doses of Pfizer vaccine – study

Antibody levels decrease rapidly after two doses of the Pfizer coronavirus vaccine, a study by researchers at the Sheba Medical Center published Wednesday in the New England Journal of Medicine showed.
 
The research also showed the probability that different groups of individuals – based on age and general health status – will find themselves below a certain antibody threshold after a period of six months.
 
And here are the data that come with the study.
 
According to the study, after six months, a healthy woman between the ages of 18 and 45 has a 2.5% probability of having an antibody level below 16 – where antibodies are generally considered absent – and 68% to have one below 256.
 
The starting point is on average several hundred.
 
The percentages of the probability of having an antibody level under 16 and under 256 become 5% and 79%, respectively, for women ages 45-65, and 6% and 81% for a woman older than 65.
 
For healthy men, the numbers are moderately higher in the first age group (respectively 4% and 75%) and the gap with women widens as they are older: A healthy man between 45 and 65 has an 11% probability of having an antibody level below 16, and 89% probability of having one below 256. For men over 65, the percentages are 15% and 92%.
 
When it comes to immunocompromised people, all age groups, men and women, have between 93% and 99% probability of having an antibody level under 256 after six months, and one in two men over 65 has an antibody level below 16.
 
It’s all just the facts, but if I read this right, the facts are terrifying.
 

Is the Chinese surveillance state the template for digital identification?


The media organisations and the same media people we think we can count on to protect us from government intrusion into our lives, and to inform us when there are threats to our privacy, are invisible on the vast expansion of the Federal Government’s Digital Identification system.

I have googled and put through DuckDuckGo a query on “media digital identification legislation” and not a single news report is found anywhere, other than a single report from The Cairns News on how wonderful this change will be.

But there was this, almost uniquely available:  Australia to open digital ID system to private sector with consultation on new legislation on ZDNet, which is hardly a household media outlet.  They try to  be positive but there is also this:

Instead of listening to researchers recommending the Australian government abandon its existing digital identity system and start again from scratch, after highlighting again security flaws in two of the systems already accredited, the government has opened a second round of consultation, this time on the development of legislation.

There was then also this:

Researchers want Australia’s digital ID system thrown out and redesigned from scratch

Researchers find myGovID is subject to an easily-implemented code proxying attack, while the digital identity solution from Australia Post does not possess a fundamental requirement for accreditation.

Why we should be grateful that the government will find it easier to access information about us is beyond me, especially in a system that will be as leaky as this? Why should I want anyone to have such access, let alone our state premiers (see Dan Andrews) or our commercial banks?

What will be included? Our financial records? Our medical records? Who will be able to gain access? Under what conditions? Is Facial Recognition Technology part of it?

Very late in the day but someone who actually cares about privacy ought to be making this an issue. Anyway, here is the government’s bright as a button booklet to help you understand how much they want these changes made: Your Guide to the Digital Identity Legislation

Not a word anywhere in it why it will be good for any of us in any way, other than it will be cheaper to keep an eye on us and much much easier.

A communist takeover of the United States

If you would like to understand what is taking place in the United States, these two virtually adjacent stories at Lucianne.com will provide you with most of what you need to know. First this:

SNAP (food stamps) benefits have largest
increase in history
 
Washington—The Biden administration has approved a significant and permanent increase in the levels of food stamp assistance available to needy families—the largest single increase in the program’s history. Families in October have seen the average benefits for food stamps (officially known as the SNAP program) rise more than 25 percent above pre-pandemic levels. The increased assistance is indefinite to all 42 million SNAP beneficiaries. The aid boost was first reported by The New York Times and the details were confirmed by a spokeswoman for the Department of Agriculture. They were formally announced by Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack. The aid boost is being packaged as a major revision
 
And then this:
 
Biden burying businesses under red tape;
more rules on the way
 
President Biden accelerated the regulatory state on his first day in office by ordering agencies to consider aspirational but vaguely defined goals and benefits when imposing new rules on businesses large and small. The order greenlighting regulations even when the benefits “are difficult or impossible to quantify” sent shudders down the spines of CEOs. They fear business growth will be smothered in pursuit of vague objectives such as “human dignity” and “the interests of future generations.” “It is the most aggressive thing I’ve ever seen by an administration,” said Doug Holtz-Eakin, president of the American Action Forum, a right-leaning economic think tank. “It’s one thing to put out
 
The American economy is disappearing under the weight of impossible regulations while welfare is replacing work as the means for paying the bills. This is socialism American style. And if you wish to understand the dynamic, let me again suggest you have a look at my article in Quadrant on The True Meaning of Conservative Thought.
`

What it means to be conservative

Let me draw your attention to an article of mine from the October issue of Quadrant that has now been put up online: Conservative Thought in the Time of Covid. The reason I wrote the article, and it is the first of two on the subject, was to point out that conservatism has a positive agenda, and is not, NOT, an attempt to conserve what presently exists, nor is it a wish to promote a laissez-faire form of economic structure. Its core ethic is to bring individual rights and personal freedom to the very centre of our political culture. 

The emphasis on rights and freedom is what allowed the market economy to create the prosperity we now take for granted, but also allowed us to live with an ability to direct our own lives in our own way that had never before existed. 

Sadly it is this personal freedom that so many now take for granted, and are apparently all too willing to throw away because of the need to deal with this transient Covid virus in our midst. 

Read the article, and then, if you are not already a subscriber, you should subscribe to Quadrant since if you are reading this blog you should also be reading the magazine.

A rare event to those in charge is one that happens to someone else

My wife was chatting to a woman in the street today, someone she had not previously met, who happened to mention that her husband had passed away four weeks before, two weeks after having been vaxxinated. For another tale along these lines although no actual death was involved, there is this just posted at The New Catallaxy:  The Adverse Reaction of Chantal Uren. There are two parts to what she told that are worth highlighting, first the efforts that were made to dissuade her from telling her story.

To the people who threatened me with defamation charges and disciplinary action for telling my story, I am disappointed. I’m disappointed that your priority is to silence me for your own ego and agenda rather than ask if I’m ok and offer me any help! At no time have you asked if I’m ok or cared for a second about my health or welfare. You decided that putting me under more stress, when that stress can cause further risk to my life is your priority. It makes me question humanity and how any person can have such a lack of empathy towards another.

I think she is more charitable to their hard-hardedness and cruel efforts to suppress such information becoming public. Adverse reactions and even deaths are occurring regularly but you will not learn any of this from the mainstream press. It is a tragedy. But the second part of her story is what happened to her immediately upon taking the vaxxination.

Within 10 minutes of getting the Pfizer vaccine, I got vertigo and nausea and within 15 minutes I had hives all over me. The doctor and ambulance officer got the rash under control but as soon as I got home I had a fever, chills and felt very unwell. For the following 3.5 weeks I suffered rashes every day, fevers as high as 39.7, aching muscles, flu like symptoms, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, pressure in my sinuses and a cough so bad that it felt like my blood vessels were going to explode in my face. Some days I cried because I thought I was going to die. I was so sick. When I thought I was starting to get better, I still had extreme fatigue and was constantly light headed. I went back to work but spent a lot of time laying on my office floor and struggling to get through the day.

Go to the link to find out the full story and even then she is giving the benefit of the doubt to those who forced her to take the vax.

I will just add this: Data Analyst proves Covid-19 Deaths increased dramatically AFTER the Vaccine roll-out in over 40 countries.

A quantitative data analyst has compiled data from Johns Hopkins University Coronavirus Resource Center and published a video showing a dramatic spike in alleged Covid-19 deaths after the introduction of the experimental Covid-19 injections in over forty different countries.

Back in February we highlighted how care home deaths allegedly due to Covid-19 had increased by 240% between January 10th and January 29th 2021, despite 95% of all care home residents having been vaccinated by January 27th.

A rare event to those in charge is one that happens to someone else. From the link:

The video shows weekly Covid-19 deaths per country, before and after Covid-19 vaccination campaigns began, and each country seems to have suffered a huge spike in Covid-19 deaths following the introduction of the Covid-19 vaccine.

And at the very end of the post there is this:

The Exposé is now censored on
Google, Facebook & Twitter.

So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the

facts the mainstream refuse to…

We’re not funded by the Government
to publish lies and propaganda on their

behalf like the mainstream media.
Instead we rely solely on your support, so
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism.
It’s quick and easy…

WITH THIS FOOTNOTE: Perhaps after such a distinguished career it is a bit sad to include this here: Colin Powell dies from Covid complications with this the sub-head: “The former secretary of State was fully vaccinated, according to his family.” A single instance is not a stat, but it is all the same an instance of what some think of as a general case. As for his politics, there is this:

In October 2008, he endorsed Barack Obama as he was weeks away from being elected the nation’s first African-American president. “I think he is a transformational figure,” Powell said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

Powell added: “I can’t deny that it will be a historic event when an African-American becomes president. And should that happen, all Americans should be proud — not just African-Americans.”

Why they should have been proud is beyond me. 

The dangers of “vaccine-induced disease”

This is a fascinating article, long but very well written and worth your time: The data is in, and we are now worse off than before the experimental shots. But this bit near the start is the most extraordinary. He is discussing a report that came out in 2018, before the rest of us had heard a word about Covid:

One of the many bone-chilling sections in this publication (pp. 45-47) provides a blueprint for “self-spreading vaccines,” described as vaccines “genetically engineered to move through populations in the same way as communicable diseases, but rather than causing disease, they confer protection.”

After noting that such an idea would violate the rules of informed consent (the irony!), and possibly spread allergic reaction, they add this shocking prediction about the challenge of such technology:

“Finally, there is a not insignificant risk of the vaccine virus reverting to wild-type virulence, as has sometimes occurred with the oral polio vaccine—which is not intended to be fully virulent or transmissible, but which has reverted to become both neurovirulent and transmissible in rare instances. This is both a medical risk and a public perception risk; the possibility of vaccine-induced disease would be a major concern to the public.”

Whether this vaccine actually sheds the spike protein onto other people is still not yet proven (although Pfizer seems to indicate it can spread through skin-to-skin contact in “inhalation“), but the principle of mass vaccination with a faulty vaccine making a virus both more transmissible and more virulent is something that is hard to deny at this point. 

“Vaccine-induced disease”! Just think about this:

This virus has taken a painful toll on both the vaccinated and unvaccinated over the past few months, a phenomenon that is very well explained with a leaky vaccine that fails to sterilize the virus but causes viral immune escape and a degree of vaccine mediated enhancement.

“Viral immune escape”. “Vaccine mediated enhancement”. The thing is, we are governed by such incompetent fools absolutely anything is possible, other than that they will ever tell us the truth.