Impeachment because the Dems have nothing else whatsoever

Trump will change what the word “impeachment” means to the country more than impeachment will change the Trump presidency. We are only days away from the word becoming meaningless.

Scott Adams

Multiple Democrats Vote Against Impeachment, Only Democrats Vote For It

History Will Judge Democrats Harshly for ‘Toxic Political Stunt’ Impeachment

Limbaugh: The 1 thing Dems haven’t calculated in Trump impeachment

Limbaugh On Impeachment Day: It’s Now Official, Media Knows They’ve Failed

The Party of Infanticide “Prayerfully” Considers Impeachment 

Donald Trump becomes 3rd president in US history to be impeached  – from our ABC

McConnell: Impeachment Process Senators Unanimously Approved for Clinton Is ‘Good Enough for Pres. Trump’ 

The Five Quotes From Trump’s Letter Most Likely to Make History

 
And this is what the President was doing while the impeachment vote was taken.

 

Apologies everywhere but no remorse

UPDATE: The President weighs in.

President Donald Trump called out James Comey, the former FBI director, in  a series of tweets on  Twitter saying, 'So what are the consequences for his unlawful conduct. Could it be years in jail?'Trump mentioned Inspector General Michael Horowitz, who Trump claims didn't expose the 'tremendous bias and guilt exposed' during the FBI's Russia interference investigation and has lost credibility

 
________________And from before

What a strange day. Must be partly Boris Johnson, partly that impeachment has gone into reverse and partly a recognition that the left agenda is near terminal, green new deal included. So first we have this: Comey: ‘I Was Wrong’ — FBI’s FISA Abuse ‘Was Not Acceptable’.

And then there was this: Schiff: ‘I Had No Idea FBI Was Committing Serious Abuses When I Said All That Stuff’.

And even this: Greta Thunberg Apologizes After Saying World Leaders Should Be ‘Put Against a Wall’ in Speech.

This might be part of the reason why: Barr Puts Obama & Company on Notice, Signals Hell Is Coming.

And this: [VIDEO] Adam Schiff Mercilessly Booed on Stage at an Event Last Night in Glendale, California.

Plus this: Supreme Court Hands Trump Huge Win, Makes Impeachment Article 2 Null & Void.

Not to mention this.

The left are now finding out that they are not as popular as they think they are. In fact, most people of sense find them repulsive, and will not vote for them if given the chance.

Impeachment only shows how vacuous the left has become

HIDDEN BY IMPEACHMENT: ONE OF TRUMP’S ‘BEST WEEKS YET.’

Added to the list of accomplishments this week:

  • An agreement on a new U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade deal.
  • A new budget including more than $1.3 billion for a border wall and blocks a government shutdown.
  • House approval of the U.S. Space Force, a brand-new branch of the military.
  • Government family leave that will be a model for a proposal for the public.
  • Tentative agreement on trade with China.
  • Approval of Trump’s 50th federal appeals judge.
  • Confirmation of a new Food and Drug Administration chief.
  • The signing of a pro-Israel anti-Semitism executive order.

Plus, advisers noted, Wall Street hit another record, and Pelosi conceded that on impeachment, “It’s been going on 22 months — two and a half years, actually.”

And, the advisers added, with impeachment likely, the president was assured by McConnell that the Senate would move fast on a trial that will end in acquittal and might include the support of two Senate Democrats, according to Sen. Rand Paul.

“There is one world where the mainstream media is covering impeachment, but there is another world where Trump is racking up a myriad of accomplishments, many of which have the support of the same Democrats who want to remove him from office,” said political communications strategist Ron Bonjean.

IG’s Report covers up as much as it can but plenty still there to be seen

The depth of the deep state is a wonder to behold, and it is only because of PDT that we have even had a glimpse of it. No one can doubt after all this time that the FBI, along with many other agencies of the American Government, are corrupt to their very depths. There are obviously many who serve honourably, but at the top they are dishonest liars in whose service they actually are is difficult at times to work out.

The Inspector General’s Report has been released which downplays FBI corruption as best it can. If the names James Comey, or Lisa Page and Peter Strzok mean anything to you, then you can be in little doubt just how corrupt this organisation has become. The IG’s Report is about the FISA application. This tells you a lot about what you need to know: John Durham issues statement saying he does NOT agree with IG report conclusions….

US Attorney John Durham, who is performing his own investigation into the origins of the Russia probe, has just released a statement indicating that, per his own investigation, he does not agree with some of the IG report conclusions.

But with this still not being the full story, even the partial tale is quite quite extraordinary: IG Report Reveals Comey Did Brief Obama on Trump Campaign Investigation.

Former FBI Director James Comey briefed President Barack Obama about the investigation into Donald Trump’s campaign before the 2016 election, according to a report released today by the Justice Department’s inspector general.

And to see how widely the deep state corruption is, the media are as complicit as the others, although they are not supposedly committed to working for the country as those who work for the government supposedly are.

No reporter has yet to ask Barack Obama what he knew about his FBI’s counterintelligence probe into Donald Trump’s campaign or when he knew it.

We’ll see what’s coming next. As for impeachment, can a former president be impeached?

Google reads your emails and no one cares

This is a post I wrote in 2014 following a previous post at the end of 2013. Self-explanatory, but the point about it at the time was that no one believed me when I was suspicious that Google was reading my emails, but now that everyone knows, no one cares. The post is from April 18, 2014.

Let me start with this news item from two days ago, Google admits it’s reading your emails:

GOOGLE HAS UPDATED its privacy terms and conditions, eroding a little more of its users’ privacy.

Google is so far unapologetic about its changes, despite having created some controversy. The bulk of the responses worry that Google is now able to read users’ emails and scan them for its various purposes.

In its terms and conditions the firm said that its users agree that information that they submit and share with its systems is all fair game. Its update, the first since last November, makes the changes very clear.

This I have known myself since last October. This is the report I sent to IT within the University:

I am doing a presentation on Tuesday next week and wrote the following note to the coordinator of the seminar:

This is the paper I will speak to which is an update on my previously published paper. I cannot believe how much things have evolved from then. I will also do a set of overheads which will help me keep track of where I am and might even be of use to those who come to listen.

Attached to it was my paper named nowhere other than in the paper itself:

The Use of Multiple Choice Questions with Explanations for Economic Assessment

This was the same title for a paper I had written in 2008 and put up on an academic website along with an abstract. But for the past five years the paper had simply been a paper that could be accessed but no one had. And then, a few hours after sending my note off to the coordinator of the seminar I received the following email:

Hi Professor Kates,

Hope you are doing well.

I would like to introduce myself as [redacted], one of the fastest growing research acceleration firm. We have been working with academicians from 35 of the top 100 universities across the globe including researchers from Harvard, Wharton, Stanford, MIT, NUS, and INSEAD.

We help researchers with Data Harvesting, Analytics, Visualization and Technology Implementation. As an organization, our primary focus is to increase research productivity, reduce research costs, and enable researchers focus on the most important facets of their research. You can read more about us here .

As we read through the abstract of research paper on The Use of Multiple Choice Questions with Explanations for Economic Assessment, we thought it would be a good idea to set up some time for a short call and explore how we can help you accelerate your research. Let me know a good time and we can schedule a call accordingly. I look foward to hearing from you.

Regards

I do not believe in coincidences, specially not one in a million shots like this would have been. This was, moreover, not just someone who had read my email but had been able to open my attachment, read its title and presumably anything else they chose to read within the contents, and then send me a follow-up email, all on the same day.

It’s not just the NSA and it’s not just our foreign enemies. My google account information is not just being shared but my attachments can be opened by total strangers. And the more I think about it, the more it burns me up.

I then had very helpful assistance from someone in our IT department who was as interested as I was in whether Google really was reading my emails and allowing others to read them as well. After quite a number of emails back and forth to each other, this was the final email sent to me.

Hi Steve,

Apologies for the delay in getting back to you.

I’ve had some ongoing discussions with Google Support and here is the summary. They say that a message that travels only within Google servers can’t be accessed in transit, so could only be seen by a third party if the sending or receiving account is compromised by eg. phishing.

However, they also say that their mailflow algorithms mean that an email sent from one Google account to another, even sent from a Google user to themselves, may leave Google’s mail servers and come back in again. In that case, messages travelling on the internet would be subject to the inherent insecurity of email.

I’ve done a quick search to find a good explanation of why/how email is insecure, and I think this one sums it up pretty well:

http://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/can-email-ever-be-secure/

As I understand it, hacking of email in transit, by eg. packet sniffing etc, is thought to be pretty rare. But it’s possible. However, there’s no way we or Google can establish whether or not this has happened since it would have occurred out in the wild, on servers or connections to which we have no access.

Not only is it not “out in the wild” or “pretty rare”, it even turns out to be integral to the google mail (gmail) system and no doubt common. The fact of the matter is that you do not know who your emails are being diverted to or who is reading them or the attachments. And now that Google has said so in public, it burns me up even more.

Same for Facebook, Twitter, and every other form of social media as well.

Censorship is not a form of free speech

Should a carrier of information be allowed to do this? ’60 Minutes:’ More Than 300 Ads by Trump Campaign Taken Down by Google and YouTube. That is, should a carrier of the views of individuals who have signed up to discuss issues with their friends and with anyone else who would like to join in, be censored by the platform on which their views are expressed?

More than 300 of President Donald Trump’s political ads have taken down by Google and its video platform YouTube, mostly over the summer, according to a report by 60 minutes.

The CBS reporters were unable to find specific reasons for the mass takedowns of Trump ads, a common problem with social media companies, which are often reluctant to explain precisely why a ban or other act of censorship has happened. “We found very little transparency in the transparency report,” concluded 60 Minutes.

They are not just publishers, they are also censors. Why is this allowed? Let me also draw in Wednesday’s editorial in The Australian: Tech titans Google and Facebook want to rule your world, wherein we find:

In July, the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission issued a report on the devastating impact of digital platforms. It was the deepest dive yet by a regulator into the predatory business models of Google, Facebook and Twitter, exposing monopoly powers, cavalier approaches to user privacy, pathological secrecy and parasitical freeloading on businesses such as News Corp Australia, our parent.

No doubt News Limited has its own interests at stake, but more importantly so do the rest of us. Moreover, Australia is being looked at as a test case:

The question is: can these giants be brought under control, their dominance checked for the common good? Authorities around the world are watching what happens here. The government’s move will have a profound effect on the future of news media and the lives of all Australians.

This is the reverse of a free speech issue in the usual sense. People didn’t sign up to twitter, facebook and youtube expecting the content of their posts to be heavily censored on behalf of massive corporate entities whose politics is embedded on the far left. We would be mad to let them get away with it, and in the long-run would pay dearly for allowing these censors to pretend they are on the side of free speech.

“trump in afghanista”

You know, the media who, of course, you can trust to keep up with everything, wanted to know why he had gone for a medical examination and why he had not worn his tie. Here’s the answer.

And for what it’s worth, I typed in “trump in afghanista” and no links came up on google. Not even this one: TRUMP IN AFGHANISTAN, which comes with this.

https://twitter.com/Scavino45/status/1200127447821377537