You will not expel them

The best article I have seen on the recently-ended conflict: Hamas’s forever war against Israel has a glitch, and it isn’t Iron Dome. This is the glitch, and it is related to a story, told at the very end of the article, of a meeting between two top Israeli generals and General Giap, who led the Vietnamese army against the Americans.

When the Israelis rose to leave, Giap suddenly turned to the Palestinian issue. “Listen,” he said, “the Palestinians are always coming here and saying to me, ‘You expelled the French and the Americans. How do we expel the Jews?’”

The generals were intrigued. “And what do you tell them?”

“I tell them,” Giap replied, “that the French went back to France and the Americans to America. But the Jews have nowhere to go. You will not expel them.”

I am not sure how positive that is about the future, but it is undoubtedly the truth. Fascinating article from end to end and well worth your time.

Wake me when it’s over

Commercial programs like The Project have bought in to Woke big time. Picture: Ten

Commercial programs like The Project have bought into Woke big time.

I saw this article this morning – Woke is a genius brand, and a threat to our way of life – and was going to put it up but now they have put it on the front page of the online edition so it must have attracted a lot of readers besides myself. It really is exceptional. These are the elements identified of the woke brand but you need to go to the article to see these fleshed out.

You need to know your market
You need a brand promise.
You need a brand personality
You need a mission statement
You need a brand book that explains how the brand behaves in all circumstances and how it relates to the world
You need a brand strategy to dominate the competition
You need to identify what is known as the “customer journey” that maps the experience with the brand
You need “full funnel” marketing that builds awareness, consideration, and purchase
You need a social media strategy
You need point of sale
You need brand-specific DIY manuals with step-by-step instructions on how to buy in

He finishes with this:

Who owns this brand?

Everyone who wants a piece. It sells a grand narrative of achieving social justice through a collection of half thought out assertions. In reality, woke threatens to undermine the values of Western civilisation.

And who could he have in mind about this? Thousands of students join climate rally in Melbourne.

Protesters gather in Melbourne’s Treasury Gardens for a climate rally on Friday.

As we read: ‘Josie, 14, from Richmond High School said not enough adults were taking action so students had to do it now. “It’s such a big issue. We have to step up,” she said.’

Thank goodness for all of these visionary 14-year olds.

Completing my short course in economics

Pilot Mechanical Pencils

The first half was my post on Value added and public spending. Growth only occurs where the value of what is produced is greater than the value of the resources that have been used up during production. There was a time when everyone understood that, even economists. Alas no longer. But there is a second element that matters, and that is the price mechanism. Unless you have a functioning price mechanism, where market prices reflect relative scarcity, you cannot tell what anything actually costs.

Which brings me to this: I, Mechanical Pencil: Why a socialist economy can never work. There you will see why the price mechanism matters and how crucial it is that the prices in the market are actually set by people who are trying to earn a living from what they sell. This is what I say about the price mechanism:

This is so important that almost nothing is as crucial as this for ensuring our prosperity continues. Without a functioning price mechanism, in which businesses set their own prices for themselves without government involvement, an economy absolutely will not work. Unless businesses are permitted to set their own prices based on their own production costs and customer demand, you are guaranteed to live in poverty.

The buffoons who “manage” the Victorian economy are creating disaster. It is why the most important element in the Victorian budget dealt with mental health: ‘Very targeted’: Acting Premier defends mental health levy.

Business owners have warned the levy set out in Thursday’s budget is a tax on employment and will hit those in the retail, hospitality and tourism sectors hard.

“These are very targeted, appropriate, well-thought-out revenue initiatives that impact less than 5 per cent of employers,” Mr Merlino said.

“Many of those are multinational companies. It is very targeted, and in terms of the benefit to businesses, right across the state of Victoria is massive….

The acting Premier rejected the notion that Victorian businesses – which were badly hit by the state’s second wave of the coronavirus pandemic caused by government failures in hotel quarantine and contact tracing – were being penalised for the state’s mistakes.

He also said a $4 billion budget blowout over the past two years on Victoria’s Big Build project had no impact on funding mental health services as the two were in different funding streams – the former in capital spending, and the latter on service delivery.

Looneys everywhere.

Value added and public spending

The video is on Value Added – which I did many years ago as part of my economics course. Much too long to watch, but it’s there if you are interested. Alas, value added is virtually no longer even mentioned inside an economics course, and even when it is it is never dwelt upon.

This mishmash is how value added is defined at Google. This is about as close to what you might get in an economics course today, and then only if they are discussing the National Accounts. It’s never mentioned as part of macro generally.

1. the amount by which the value of an article is increased at each stage of its production, exclusive of initial costs. “the proportions of both total output and value added fell”

2. the addition of features to a basic line or model for which the buyer is prepared to pay extra. “value-added digital technology”

Value added was once properly understood as the difference between the cost of the resources used up in some production process and the revenue stream generated by selling the products that have been produced. It was about creating economic growth and higher living standards. Government spending is almost never value adding, and I include the word “almost” since occasionally, very occasionally, governments actually create more value then they use up. There is no such government anywhere in the world today.

I am reminded of all of this by the release of the Victorian budget and the shamelessly shallow response in the media. Treasurer goes all in on the Robin Hood approach to funding.

If you ever needed proof of how confident the Andrews government is of winning the next election, look no further than Thursday’s budget.

Handing down his seventh budget, Treasurer Tim Pallas resembled Robin Hood as he hit developers, big business and affluent home buyers with higher taxes to fund billions of dollars in spending on mental health, hospitals and schools.

Boosting taxes is rarely popular at the ballot box. But next year, the state government’s tax revenue will increase 13.2 per cent, with an average annual increase of 6.9 per cent over four years.

Justifying the tax grab, Mr Pallas said he was simply asking Victorians who had done well out of the pandemic – successful businesses and those lucky enough to hold on to their jobs – to help those who had suffered the most. It’s a strong argument.

This was once known as eating one’s seed corn. This is entirely using up your capital base with no replacement in sight. This has gone even beyond Keynesian moonshine, where they used to pretend that the problem they were solving was caused by too much saving. I guarantee you Australians are not saving too much, nor is anyone else. Now it is just spending for spending sake.

And let me thank Rodney for finding this video and alerting me to its existence on Youtube.

How the UK government weaponised fear during Covid

And it was hardly the only one.

And as for recent books with a focus on how deluded we have been by our institutions, there is also this one: The Gray Lady Winked: How the New York Times’s Misreporting, Distortions and Fabrications Radically Alter History. Here’s the description at the link.

“The New York Times is by far the most influential newspaper in the world and thus receives far too little journalistic scrutiny due to its power to affect careers. Any book that casts a critical eye on the Paper of Record’s history, as this book does, is performing a valuable service.”—Glenn Greenwald

 

Think a newspaper can’t be responsible for mass murder? Think again.

As flagship of the American news media, the New York Times is the world’s most powerful news outlet. With thousands of reporters covering events from all corners of the globe, the Times has the power to influence wars, foment revolution, shape economies and change the very nature of our culture. It doesn’t just cover the news: it creates it.

But the institution that is the New York Times is showing cracks. No longer the fact-stringing paper of record once known as the Gray Lady, the Times has become a political lightning rod that divides more often than it unites. It is frequently beset by scandal and has even emerged as a symbol of the political, cultural and social ills plaguing our society.


The Gray Lady Winked pulls back the curtain on this illustrious institution to reveal a quintessentially human organization where ideology, ego, power and politics compete with the more humble need to present the facts. In its 10 gripping chapters, The Gray Lady Winked offers readers an eye-opening, often shocking, look at the New York Times’s greatest journalistic failures, so devastating they changed the course of history.


These are the stories that mattered most, including the Times’s disastrous coverage of the:


Second World War – Holocaust – Rise of the Soviet Union – Cuban Revolution – Vietnam War – Second Palestinian Intifada – Atomic Bombing of Japan – Iraq War – Founding of America


The result is an essential look at the tangled relationship between media, power and politics in a post-truth world told with novelistic flair to reveal a uniquely powerful institution’s tortured relationship with the truth.


Most importantly of all, The Gray Lady Winked presents a cautionary tale that shows what happens when the guardians of the truth abandon that sacred value in favor of self-interest and ideology—and what this means for our future as much as for our past.

From Quora

What do you do if a girl hits you?

“An aggressive action from anyone should be rejected and punished.”

Related questions.

Why is it OK for a woman to hit a man, but it’s wrong for that same man to hit that same woman back in self-defense?
Is it right if a girl hits you and you hit her back?
What should a guy do if a girl hits him?
Is it okay to hit a girl if she hit you first?
What do you do when a woman hits you? Do you hit back, ignore her, or threaten to call the police?
Say a woman hits a man for no reason. The man did not provoke her in any way. Does the man have every right to hit a woman back, in self defense, for hitting him for no reason?
How come boys aren’t allowed to hit girls but I see a lot of girls hitting boys?
What can you do if a girl hits you and you’re a guy and you can’t hit her back?
In America, why are people shocked when a man hits a female back? Why should man not hit back a female, when he would hit back another male?
Is it illegal to hit a woman for self-defense?
`
The answers are similar throughout. If someone is attacked, whether by a woman or a man, the right to defend oneself is universally understood.
`

Feminist self-harm discussed

Feminist Confesses: “I’m All For Feminism, But It’s Making It Hard to Date”

—Ace

You don’t say. You don’t say.

This was published by Bolde. I can’t find it on the site; maybe they’ve deleted it. There is a Jennifer Lee that writes there, so that checks out.

Or maybe it’s a spoof meant to look like it was published on Bolde. I dunno.

Let’s assume it’s real, provisionally.

Watch as very obvious dimes drop one by one.

I consider myself a feminist, but I can’t lie–I’m starting to notice its effects on my dating life. This doesn’t change my belief in equality, I just hope that men and women can eventually learn to date in harmony because it’s pretty messy right now.1. I’M HYPER AWARE OF EVERY SEXIST THING A GUY DOES NOW.

It doesn’t take much for me to overanalyze a guy’s intentions nowadays. I used to see a guy opening a door for me as nice and polite, but lately, gestures like this have been making me angry. I know the guys offering these acts of chivalry have no intention to make me feel small or lesser than, but now that my eyes have been opened to feminist theory, it’s all I’m able to think about.

Please save me from my cult.

2. GUYS ARE STARTED TO THINK WE DON’T NEED THEM ANYMORE.

Even though the feminist movement is pretty much the best thing to happen to this world since sliced bread, it’s taking its toll in the dating scene. The thing is, I’m starting to get a bit of a stand-offish vibe from guys, like they’re afraid to make a move, and I think it’s because they think that we don’t need them anymore….

You don’t say. I wonder where men would get the idea that women who say “a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle” would not need men anymore.

3. ONE LITTLE ANTI-FEMINIST COMMENT CAN COMPLETELY TURN ME OFF.When I’m out with a guy and he says one thing that’s even REMOTELY offensive towards women, I find it really hard to recover. I instantly write guys off if they aren’t “woke” to the current social mindset towards gender politics and can’t let it go. Let’s just say I’ve gone on A LOT of first dates that never go anywhere.

Cults train cultists to be alienated from normal non-cult society, so that they have no refuge, except the cult.

It’s what keeps them coming back.

4. IT’S LIKE GUYS ARE WALKING ON EGGSHELLS AROUND US.Guys are feeling the heat and we can all tell. They’re afraid to compliment us or relate to us in the way they were always taught to and trust me, this is a good thing. However, women still like to be pursued (at least I do) and it’s unfortunate that by finally standing up for our rights and demanding respect, we’re totally scaring men away. It’s so messed up and a total shame.

It’s almost as if she’s realized she’s been brainwashed.

5. I’VE BEEN BRAINWASHED TO ASSUME THE WORST IN MEN.

Oh, there you go.

All it takes is one quick scroll down my newsfeed and I have enough feminist rants to last me several winters. I think I’ve almost trained my brain to assume ALL men are here to try to put me down and dominate me when that’s far from the truth. I’ve made it kind of an automatic reflex at this point, though.

It’s almost as if feminists have trained themselves to be hostile, paranoid man-haters.

Almost.

I mean…

…8. IT’S MADE US MORE SEPARATE FROM EACH OTHER THAN EVER BEFORE.

Men and women ALREADY have so much trouble trying to understand each other, but feminism has turned our society into a bit of a battle of the sexes. I’m not on their side or anything, I’m just pointing out that we’re currently in a sort of “us against them” mentality and it’s gonna take a while until it all smooths out.

A “sort of us versus them mentality.”

Just sort of!, ..

10. I SWEAR GUYS ARE APPROACHING ME LESS.

Is it just me or are guys doing a lot more looking around than actually approaching? Times are a little weird right now and I guess guys are afraid that the way they approach women might offend us or give us the wrong impression.

Nah, you’re fine. Keep on doing what you’re doing.

This is so perfect that I’m afraid it might be a troll but YOLO, it’s still all true.

AddendumHere is the Bolde link to the article: it’s real! [CBD]

From Ace of Spades, who for some reason leaves out this which is in some ways the best bit:

7. THE DEBATE ON WHO SHOULD PAY HAS NEVER BEEN MORE ALIVE.

I’m on the side that believes whoever does the asking should also do the paying. If I ask a guy out on a date, I would expect to pay, absolutely. If a guy asks me, I would expect that he shells out the money for the evening. It’s just the way it should be. However, due to the recent boost in feminism, a guy paying the bill could be seen as anti-feminist and no guy wants to be considered a misogynist in this day and age. The song and dance of who’s gonna pay has never been more awkward and it’s making dating that much more difficult to maneuver.