The Jewish Arts quarter in Elsternwick

An artist's impression of the proposed Jewish Arts Quarter in Elsternwick.

An artist’s impression of the proposed Jewish Arts Quarter in Elsternwick.

In the morning, on the way to the station I turn right onto Sinclair Street and there is Sholem Aleicham with all of the children playing in the playground. And then I turn left onto Selwyn Street which is where the Holocaust Centre is located. Same Jewish children exactly, only separated by place and date. It often spooks me out. This is from The Age today:‘Our own Lygon Street’: Jewish arts precinct set for Elsternwick.

Melbourne could get its own “Jewish Lygon Street”, showcasing the diaspora’s art, history and culture in the city’s south.

The proposed Jewish Arts Quarter, on Selwyn Street in Elsternwick, includes a new eight-storey building featuring exhibition, co-working and education spaces.

From Israeli dance workshops to Yiddish performances, art and craft markets, and street festivals, it is hoped the quarter will be a creative hub to learn, shop, eat, meet and schmooze.

Project co-chair Joe Tigel grew up blocks away from the Kadimah, where his father, a Holocaust survivor, threw himself into cultural life after arriving in Australia from Poland through Germany following the Second World War.

“The Kadimah was this massive repository of Jewish life because the post-Holocaust generation … came to see it as its cultural home,” he said. “It gave you a richness of being.

“We just enjoyed [a] celebration of being who we were and freedom.”

Mr Tigel, who is also the Kadimah’s vice-president, described the new quarter as an expansion and reimagining of the area that would provide a cultural home for generations to come.

He said while Melbourne had many Jewish religious and educational institutions, it lacked a hub that catered to the diversity of Australian Jews.

“We want to be a broad church and that is to give a sense of Jewish culture, creativity, expression, without dogma,” he said.

Mr Tigel hoped the precinct would attract all Melburnians, similar to how people travel to Oakleigh for Greek culture and to Footscray for Vietnamese experiences.

“This is an opportunity for our community to celebrate itself, but also for others to be welcome in it and start to get a feel for our food and culture,” he said.

Jewish Museum of Australia director Jess Bram said it was “phenomenally exciting” and a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for the organisations to offer an experience as a collective.

The design also features a sprawling plaza, to be surrounded by shops and restaurants.

“It’s a reinvigoration of Jewish life and culture in one streetscape,” she said. “There’s a profound impact that will have, not only in the way that we engage with our audiences and the Jewish community, but more globally as well in terms of the storytelling that we can do.

“There’s going to be some magic that comes to Elsternwick.”

MP for Caulfield David Southwick said it would help fight growing anti-Semitism.

“The best way to combat hate is through education and experience,” he said. “It will teach the worst atrocity known to man … the Holocaust, but also show … how resilient the Jewish community has been. It’s creating our own Jewish Lygon Street.”

Glen Eira mayor Margaret Esakoff said although the proposal was yet to go before the council, it had been well received.

“It has certainly been something that we’ve envisioned as being appropriate for this particular part of Elsternwick,” she said.

“It should be something that ends up very valuable and vibrant.”

Residents have been rallying against another proposal for Selwyn Street, on the corner of Sinclair Street, where supermarket giant Woolworths wants to turn ABC’s old studios into twin towers, one 14 storeys high.

The proposal by the supermarket, which is before the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal, includes selling a 1000-square-metre space to the Jewish Arts Quarter at a reduced rate.

Stop the Elsternwick Towers member Kathy Deacon said the group was in favour of the Jewish quarter, but against the Woolworths development.

Locating a supermarket on a site that can only be serviced by trucks running along small side streets and opposite the School must be against every form of zoning regulation ever devised. We hardly need another supermarket in the area, but this would be unique. And in a perfect setting for what it wishes to become.

Whiteness are personal characteristics and not a skin colour

The poster is found here: Smithsonian’s Anti-White Propaganda. It supposedly provides the characteristics of “white culture”, which seems like an astonishingly racist term and generalisation. Even “people of colour” have now also adopted many of these character traits.

Yet for me, reading through the individual items, there does not seem to be a single negative characteristic. Most of it just seems to outline characteristics required for personal achievement in the modern world for anyone who wishes to get on with their own talents and abilities to achieve personal success. Whether anyone personally fits the description, unless they are a member of some dynasty or part of the ruling class where they have been born, their own wealth and wellbeing seem to be largely determined by whether the population they are embedded within have these characteristics, although some do seem to be unnecessary:

  • hardly seems necessary to be from North America
  • Christian religion seems optional – all religious traditions welcome
  • female “subordination” again seems perfectly unnecessary
  • “blonde, thin and Barbie” is plain idiotic
  • not restricted to European traditions
  • virtually no one thinks in terms of “win at all cost”
  • introverts also succeed

The people who put this together are genuinely ignorant at a very deep level. Produce something that others will buy, or possess a skill that others will hire, and you can succeed anywhere within this culture.

Absent either some product provided to the market or some specialised skill, it is hard to earn a large personal income, but can still succeed as an employee. Many do exactly that, and it has nothing to do with “whiteness”.

For more, there is this, which really has been put out by the Smithsonian: Whiteness. These personal characteristics have nothing to do with the colour of one’s skin. They can make all the excuses they like, but skin colour makes no difference in the modern world.

We are surrounded by dangerous fools at every turn. The left is repulsive in almost every respect. How can anyone take such stupidity seriously?

It’s worth having a look at the comments thread at Instapundit.

Why is it legal for a state to order a lockdown?

Can this be legal? Why is this incompetent fool, Daniel Andrews, allowed to shut down an entire state on his own say so?

Here’s the latest rumour: Australia Victoria is considering Stage 4 coronavirus restrictions.

Melburnians have been put back under Stage 3 restrictions, but what would Stage 4 look like?
Melburnians have been put back under Stage 3 restrictions, but what would Stage 4 look like? Source: AAP

`

Mandatory mask-wearing, additional testing, and forcing businesses to close their doors are just some of the potential restrictions on the cards if Stage 4 were to be introduced.

Seriously, how insane is this?

But after a fifth day of new case numbers over 200 since the second outbreak began, authorities have flagged these rules could be tightened.

200 new cases in a state with 6.5 million people. That is approximately 200/6,500,000 which is 0.003% of the population of Victoria.

Dan Andrews is an hysterical fool. He is a blight on the population of Victoria. Virtually everything that has gone wrong since CV began has been Daniel Andrew’s own personal responsibility.

There is now even a Victorian version of the virus that has been detected in Sydney. It should be named after Daniel Andrews which is all the immortality he deserves as the most incompetent Premier Victoria has ever had.

How can such an order be challenged? If under the present constitution we can do nothing, then we must amend the constitution. Does no one any longer care about their personal freedoms? Is Labor now the party of tyranny?

You are almost certainly not going to die from the Corona Virus but you might yet be bankrupted.

LET’S ALSO NOT FORGET THIS: Conroy ‘s ‘red underpants’ comments.

Federal Communications Minister Stephen Conroy has defended a comment he made about Australian telecommunications bosses wearing red underpants on their heads.

Senator Conroy made the remarks in a presentation he gave in New York earlier this week.

A scratchy recording has emerged of Senator Conroy talking about telecommunications and the cost of broadband in Australia during the presentation.

“I’m in charge of spectrum auctions and if I say to you everyone in this room, ‘if you want to bid next week in our spectrum auction you better wear red underpants on your head’, you’ll be wearing them on your head,” he said.

“I have unfettered legal power.”

Senator Conroy made the comments comparing the Government’s position in the telecommunications industry in Australia to that in the United States.

“Not many regulators have quite that much power,” he said.

“But we don’t just have the power, we believe we have the responsibility to do something.”

So the Feds can tell us to wear whatever they like. Can the States? And can we do anything about it?

My letter to the Societies for the History of Economics [the SHOE list]

Now sent. Here is the background.

I’ve had another look at the problem raised by the Committee where they discussed their concern and acknowledged our “special responsibility, as historians of economics, to educate ourselves and others about the roles played by racism, colonialism and other forms of bias in shaping the concepts, practices, agendas and professional institutions of economists and social scientists throughout history.” I am even beginning to warm to this notion myself in the fixation among historians of economics with dead white European males [defined here:
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/dead_white_European_male#:~:text=(derogatory)%20Any%20of%20various%20white,ingrained%20into%20Western%20education

On further reflection, there may be a very important upside to this re-examination of our area of study. Let me look in particular at this fellow Karl Marx. There’s a dead white European male if ever there was one. Why aren’t he and all of his writings now being completely excised from our classrooms, our textbooks and from our scholarly journals? How should economists, and social theorists generally, deal with such an individual along with his close associate Fredrich Engels? Take this article, and there are many others like it:

“Marx and Engels’s theory of history: making sense of the race factor” [ https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/44504342/Marx_and_Engels_s_theory_of_history_making_sense_of_the_race_factor.pdf ]. Here’s the abstract:

This article argues that Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels’s theory of history contained racist components. In Marx and Engels’s understanding, racial disparities emerged under the influence of shared natural and social conditions hardening into heredity and of the mixing of blood. They racialized skin-colour groups, ethnicities, nations and social classes, while endowing them with innate superior and inferior character traits. They regarded race as part of humanity’s natural conditions, upon which the production system rested. ‘Races’ endowed with superior qualities would boost economic development and productivity, while the less endowed ones would hold humanity back. Marxist race thinking reflected common Lamarckian and Romantic-Nationalist assumptions of the era.

Surely Karl Marx and his associate Fredrich Engels must now be immediately and completely removed from the study of economics and the history of economics.
/s

Cancel Karl

On further reflection, there may be some upsides to this cancel culture business, specially within economics. How bout this fellow Karl Marx. There’s a dead white European male if ever there was one. Why isn’t he now being cancelled? How should economists, and social theorists generally, deal with this: Marx and Engels’s theory of history: making sense of the race factor. Here’s the abstract:

This article argues that Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels’s theory of history contained racist components. In Marx and Engels’s understanding, racial disparities emerged under the influence of shared natural and social conditions hardening into heredity and of the mixing of blood. They racialized skin-colour groups, ethnicities, nations and social classes, while endowing them with innate superior and inferior character traits. They regarded race as part of humanity’s natural conditions, upon which the production system rested. ‘Races’ endowed with superior qualities would boost economic development and productivity, while the less endowed ones would hold humanity back. Marxist race thinking reflected common Lamarckian and Romantic-Nationalist assumptions of the era.

If we are going to colour-code who we allow to speak or whose words we listen to, which I do not for a second believe we should, why not turn to Thomas Sowell: Thomas Sowell says concept of systemic racism ‘has no meaning,’ warns US could reach ‘point of no return’.

“You hear this phrase, ‘systemic racism’ [or] ‘systemic oppression’,” host Mark Levin told Sowell. “You hear it on our college campuses. You hear it from very wealthy and fabulously famous sports stars. What does that mean? And whatever it means, is it true?”

“It really has no meaning that can be specified and tested in the way that one tests hypotheses,” answered Sowell, who added that the currency of the phrase reminds him of the “propaganda tactics” of Nazi Germany.

The true racists are the ones who believe skin colour should have any bearing on political issues.

“Everything is what it is, and not another thing”

And what is everything about at this time and in America? It’s All About November 3. The point of the article, by Roger Kimball, whose premise I have believed since the start:

I do not believe I am violating the principle of Bishop Butler’s argument when I say that almost everything happening in our society—all the craziness, all the posturing, all the distracting noise, exaggeration, and downright mendacity—all of it is not about itself but about something else, and that something else is Donald Trump….

The unremitting, monolithic wall of noise that has been crashing against Donald Trump since election day 2016 has gotten louder and louder, more cacophonous, more furious, more irrational. Everything is what it is, and not another thing. But the one thing that takes precedence over everything now is defeating Trump, which means defeating not only Trump himself but what he stands for—those 63 million voters who put him in office, for starters.

Do enough of us get it? Will we beat back the tide? That is what is at stake and only time will tell. Read the entire article through and think about what part you ought to take yourself. It’s not long. This is how it ends.

Everything that is happening between now and November 3 is about November 3. But the fundamental choice is not really Donald Trump or Joe Biden. It is civilization and America on one side, anarchy and woke tyranny on the other. The Democrats thought they could ride the tiger to victory. Instead, they will be consumed by the monster they created but could not control.

And after you read the article read the comments where you will find these charts.

Thumbnail

Thumbnail

And let me pair the above with this, via Instapundit.

WHY I SIGNED THE HARPER’S LETTER:

In 1996, the late great Iranian filmmaker Abbas Kiarostami was on stage taking questions at the Lincoln Center in New York City after the premiere of his film Through the Olive Trees, when someone asked why he had used classical music (a piece from Concerto for Oboe and Strings by Domenico Cimarosa) in a movie that was set in a small village in northern Iran? Kiarostami turned to me, his translator for the hour, and said, in his soft voice and even softer manner, “Tell him classical music has long ceased to belong to the West. It belongs to the world now.”

That exchange, the way Kiarostami disabused the audience of the notion that music knew borders or that great ideas, once invented, remained the “property” of one nation or region, was on my mind when I signed the “Letter on Justice and Open Debate,” which ran in Harper’s Magazine last Tuesday. What I saw at the heart of the text was a defense of American democracy, which no longer belongs solely to America. For every activist on the streets of Hong Kong, every feminist in the prisons of Saudi Arabia, and every interned Uighur in China, America and its democracy remain, for better or worse, the last hope. Are they naïve and misguided? Right or wrong? It does not matter. Those who are suffering under tyrannies around the world, who are trying to imagine a different future for themselves and their fellow citizens, do not dream of Moscow, Beijing, or any nation in Europe. Just as little girls in the far corners of the world who do not even speak English want to dance like Beyoncé, and just as the youth living under prohibition in the Middle East huddle together to secretly watch bootlegged copies of Hollywood films, activists everywhere look to America, and dream of this democracy.

Hysteria in the time of Covid

We’re living through the greatest mass hysteria in modern history and there are no men of reason to end it.

With thanks to Currency Lad