Category Archives: Politics – international

An even more than usually repulsive and disgusting anti-Trump “conservative”

Posted on by
Reply

This time it is Bill Kristol who has a strategy of his own to stop Trump, explained here.

Their plan is to run a candidate who could win three states and enough votes in the electoral college to deny both parties the needed majority. This would throw the election into the House of Representatives, which would then elect a candidate the Kristol group found acceptable. The fact that this would nullify the largest vote ever registered for a Republican primary candidate, the fact that it would jeopardize the Republican majorities in both the House and Senate, and more than likely make Hillary Clinton president, apparently doesn’t faze Kristol and company at all.

And why should Trump be stopped. These are hardly the kind of specifics that amount to any kind of charge at all:

Their chief justification for opposing Trump is that he is not a “constitutional conservative” and in fact is “without principles” and therefore dangerous. The evidence offered is that he has supported Democrats in the past and changed his positions on important issues.

A second charge against Trump is that his character is so bad (worse than Hillary’s or Bill’s?) that no right-thinking Republican could regard him as White House worthy.

In addition to alleging that Trump is lacking in principles and character, Kristol claims that the Republican candidate is a crackpot conspiracy theorist, a disqualifying trait. Kristol’s evidence is a remark Trump made on the eve of the Indiana primary suggesting that Ted Cruz’s father might have something to hide about his alleged acquaintance with Kennedy assassin Lee Harvey Oswald.

The article is by David Horowitz and the title is “Bill Kristol: Republican Spoiler, Renegade Jew”. I might have had some qualms about the title, but Horowitz explains himself in a way I am completely sympathetic with.

All these dishonesties and flim-flam excuses pale by comparison with the consequences Kristol and his “Never Trump” cohorts are willing to risk by splitting the Republican vote. Obama has provided America’s mortal enemy, Iran, with a path to nuclear weapons, $150 billion dollars, and the freedom to develop intercontinental ballistic missiles to deliver the lethal payloads. Trump has promised to abandon the Iran deal, while Hillary Clinton and all but a handful of Democrats have supported this treachery from start to finish. Kristol is now one of their allies.

I am a Jew who has never been to Israel and has never been a Zionist in the sense of believing that Jews can rid themselves of Jew hatred by having their own nation state. But half of world Jewry now lives in Israel, and the enemies whom Obama and Hillary have empowered — Iran, the Muslim Brotherhood, Hezbollah, ISIS, and Hamas — have openly sworn to exterminate the Jews. I am also an American (and an American first), whose country is threatened with destruction by the same enemies. To weaken the only party that stands between the Jews and their annihilation, and between America and the forces intent on destroying her, is a political miscalculation so great and a betrayal so profound as to not be easily forgiven.

Utterly beyond the pale and all comprehension. Kristol is siding with the greatest carriers of evil in our time, and a bleak centuries-long future for the entire human race will be the result of their success. The arrogant, smug brainlessness of those who would risk the election of Hillary where there is no other viable candidate beyond Donald Trump makes these people vile and despicable. And that goes for Commentary who has published this article by Jonathan Tobin criticising Horowitz titled, Breitbart’s ‘Renegade Jew’ Disgrace. And beyond that, it extends to Powerline, who has made Tobin’s article one of its “picks”. Unforgivable and worthless.

REACTIONS TO THE HOROWITZ ARTICLE: Just because they state the obvious does not make it nonetheless true: Renegade Conservative Site BREITBART’s Sin–Not Anti-Semitism, But Pro-Trumpism.

AND NOW TO ADD TO THE REST: Found here:

David Horowitz incidentally has been a great friend to me over the years. I have known him since I was 15 years old when I once worked for Alan Dershowitz. He is now a Trump delegate and I know he will have Trump’s ear on the issues that matter regarding world peace.

Wow. If ever there were a killer argument to vote for The Donald, that is it.

A case study of a Trump supporter who works for the Murdoch press

Posted on by
Reply

If you work for Murdoch, them’s the rules. You cannot support Donald Trump for president. So let us see how Tim Blair gets around it.

A number of friends and many readers are fans of Donald Trump. That’s OK. I understand his appeal, even if he’s a fraud. Although it’s true that he does sometimes make the right calls:

Donald Trump on Friday picked a prominent climate change skeptic to help him craft his energy policy and pushed back against renewed calls that he release his income tax returns — saying his tax rate is “none of your business.”

But for Melbourne-based artist and writer Aubrey Perry, support for Trump is an absolute deal-breaker. This applies even when Trump’s supporters are her parents:

I’d known for a while that my mum was open to the idea of Trump as her candidate. My dad has been a Trump supporter from the beginning. But I’ve lived in Australia for the past seven years. They live in the US. We text and Facebook with each other, but we don’t discuss politics.

And I don’t use Twitter much. But, wow. My mum does. I recently checked her Twitter page for the first time in a while and was shocked …

I was shocked.

I told her so. Publicly. Finally. I wrote back, “Your Twitter feed makes me disappointed and embarrassed of you as a person, a supposed critical thinker, and my mother. Shocked.”

Here’s her mother’s Twitter page. It isn’t shocking at all. It’s just the opinions of someone who happens to be very enthusiastic about a certain presidential candidate. Yet this has led Aubrey to denounce her family as racists and to “sever all ties with my parents as long as they promote these ideologies of hate and xenophobia”.

A reminder to Aubrey, who is evidently a Clinton backer: Hillary attended Trump’s wedding. Shocked!

But do go to her mother’s twitter page and you will find a quite nicely put and succinct summary of why sensible people support Trump and abominate Hillary. Lots to see, but this one I liked best, specially in this context:

women for trump

Why Democrat are guaranteed to be corrupt and sleazy

Posted on by
Reply

From The New York Times, in a story with the title, Little Is Off Limits as Donald Trump Plans Attacks on Hillary Clinton’s Character.

Donald J. Trump plans to throw Bill Clinton’s infidelities in Hillary Clinton’s face on live television during the presidential debates this fall, questioning whether she enabled his behavior and sought to discredit the women involved.

Mr. Trump will try to hold her accountable for security lapses at the American consulate in Benghazi, Libya, and for the death of Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens there.

And he intends to portray Mrs. Clinton as fundamentally corrupt, invoking everything from her cattle futures trades in the late 1970s to the federal investigation into her email practices as secretary of state.

These are all true. The question is why he is the only one who would use these stories? That is what is wrong with American politics and its media. If telling the truth about Democrats in relation to character issues that matter is considered unfair, the election of Democrats of bad character is guaranteed.

One more “conservative” to scratch off my list

Posted on by
Reply

There are so many people who have discredited themselves in my eyes as representatives of the right, and conservatism in particular, that by the time this election season is over, there will be virtually no one left I trust.

Now it is Daniel Hannan who has entered the fray. He takes the pose of an above-it-all intellectual, too pure to endorse the far from perfect Donald Trump. He has published a brief note on The real reason Donald Trump is unfit to be president. And here is the reason:

The real disqualification, from a conservative point of view, is Trump’s refusal to recognize that he is aspiring to an office bigger than he is.

Well la dee dah. Now aren’t we being precious. In fact, it is worse than that. He is off with the pixies in thinking that there is some kind of fastidious approach in which politics ends can be accomplished without strength of character and a hardline approach to getting one’s own way rather than another being allowed to get their way. If Hannan weren’t so famous as a torch bearer for the right, you could ignore him. In fact, from now on I will feel he can be safely ignored.

In the meantime let me repeat his various arguments, which amount to absolutely nothing at all. I might add, that I also don’t think he is right about a single thing he says. And for such a short article the number of false analogies is astonishing. A comparison of any of these with the likes of Hillary shows a blindness that is quite remarkable.

“He is a narcissistic, thin-skinned bully, a serial liar, a man who shows not the slightest respect for the office to which he aspires.”

“Next to his moral unsuitability, the fact that he is bad news for conservatives seems almost trivial. It’s not his big-government protectionism that ought to bar him from high office. It’s not even the way in which he will undo decades of progress and taint the Republicans once again with xenophobia.”

“This isn’t about Hillary. It’s about defending the republic from a candidate who is hostile to its foundational values.”

“Donald Trump is inimical to the core Republican values of personal freedom, limited government, enterprise and a patriotic foreign policy.”

“I say only one thing with absolute certainty: Don’t vote for an unfit candidate simply because you dislike another unfit candidate. Doing so makes you complicit. It means endorsing one of two amoral, power-hungry people who would very probably ignore their oath of office.”

“As Vaclav Havel used to say in Czechoslovakia, living under a Communist regime doesn’t mean that you have to legitimize it. A citizen can still retain his or her integrity by refusing to vote for the approved list, refusing to display party posters, refusing to repeat official slogans. And integrity matters. Indeed, at present, it’s pretty much all that American conservatives have left. For the love of God, cousins, don’t throw it away.”

Conservatives understand that perfection is not found in human affairs and one must work with the tools one has at hand. Hannan is one more pompous fool whose lack of judgement explains why he has failed to rise among the British Conservative Party. How is this for a rounded full-on idiocy?

“Is Trump any worse than Hillary?” isn’t just setting the bar absurdly low; it’s also the wrong question. The right question is, “Is Donald Trump fit to be president?” And the answer must surely be, “No.”

Look, stupid. The only question is which one of these two you prefer to the other. It is infuriating to read such stuff. I guess I will have to wait another 25 years for Trump to have become the perfect representation of conservative thought, which will finally occur, as it has with Reagan today, when there is someone else trying to disturb the establishment of the time that is yet to be, and the usual suspects are lamenting there is no one like Donald Trump around any more.

He can’t go soon enough

Posted on by
Reply

As I wrote the title I thought there are a lot of people I would say that about, but in this case it’s Barack Obama. I wish him a long and frustrated retirement as he watches Donald Trump reverse everything he set in place. Which brings to mind two stories from today.

First there’s this: Obama goes after Trump in Rutgers commencement address and slams building ‘walls,’ isolationism, and ‘conspiracy theories’ – and even defends the ‘rigged’ political system. It is only because he is a narcissistic loon that he thinks anyone still pays attention to what he says, in the sense that what he says actually changes anyone’s mind about anything. He is regularly the stupidest man in any room he enters, and is almost certainly always the least informed. He can talk through a teleprompter, but off the cuff he is famously incapable of stringing two coherent words together. It is unimaginable how smart this pathological dishonest dumbbell thinks he is to be quoted as saying this:

‘In politics and in life, ignorance is not a virtue,’ Obama said. ‘It’s not cool to not know what you’re talking about. That’s not keeping it real or telling it like it is. That’s not challenging political correctness. That’s just not knowing what you’re talking about.’

‘When our leaders express a disdain for facts. When they’re not held accountable for repeating falsehoods and just making stuff up, and actual experts are dismissed as elitists, then we’ve got a problem,’ Obama said.

At least he’s right that we have got a problem. It’s just that he doesn’t know what that problem is.

So to the second story: Donald Trump insists Britain would NOT be at the back of the queue for a trade deal if he wins the White House. Here we have a head to head comparison between Obama and Trump. Obama blunders his way across the world, and in this case offending large sections of the British public, buying in where he has no business to be. Trump just says that this is a decision for the UK to make and whatever they decide the US will do what it can to accommodate.

Donald Trump today insisted Brexit would not put Britain at the ‘back of the queue’ to secure a US trade deal should he become president.

The presumptive Republican nominee said it would make no difference to him whether Britain decides to stay with the European Union or chooses to leave next month.

The remarks struck a markedly different tone to incumbent president Barack Obama who issued a stark warning about the prospects for a trade deal for Britain on a visit last month.

Mr Obama triggered outrage from Out campaigners who warned foreign leaders should not be intervening on Britain’s referendum.

He will be gone in less than a year, but the damage he has left behind will go forward into the deepest future.

Why is Venezuela not at the top of the news every day?

Posted on by
Reply

Venezuela is the socialist nightmare of our time. It is kept out of the media in the same way that the famines in the Ukraine were kept out of The New York Times in the 1930s. The socialists who mis-report the news do not wish to see their dreams exposed no more than they would like to live in the countries they hide the details about.

Here’s the latest episode: SCENES FROM THE VENEZUELA APOCALYPSE: “COUNTLESS WOUNDED” AFTER 5,000 LOOT SUPERMARKET LOOKING FOR FOOD.

Capitalism works. Nothing else does. This is the lesson from Venezuela that none of the fools who follow Bernie Sanders or the Greens ever seem to understand.

There is this contrast with the United States, which is of course at the absolute opposite extreme, but is somehow disturbing in its own way. Yet if you asked Americans and Venezuelans (and Cubans and North Koreans) which they preferred, there is no doubt which of the two virtually everyone would prefer. It’s the ones who prefer the genuine austerity of Venezuela we have to worry about.

Waiting for a miracle is not a plan

Posted on by
Reply

My obscure and personal blog is in the midst of experiencing the largest number of hits in its history. My post on Ayaan Hirsi Ali has made its way out beyond these precincts so we will have our fifteen minutes of notoriety and then fade back into the pack. It did even occur to me as I wrote that earlier post that this was something I should leave alone since Hirsi Ali is a brave woman with a crucially important message. I remain disappointed that she cannot see in Donald Trump a vehicle for some kind of reversal if it is not entirely too late. And that is why I ended up writing what I did.

There is no one else anywhere to be found who might be able to take a stand and reverse this tide. There are a thousand things wrong with Trump but whatever they are, they are mere flea bites compared with the things that are wrong with Hillary and Obama. I therefore remain astounded at the way so many of the people I know dismiss Trump because of various personal characteristics of his, and ignore, or set to the side, his potential to do a quite large amount of good in spite of all the negatives he may come with.

If you are the sort of person who thinks the nation states of the West need to be preserved, there is no one else who is anywhere near being in a position to achieve this end than Trump. I am therefore not for the first time reminded of this very old story which seems to get to the heart of the issue.

There once was a flood and everyone had reached safety except for one man.

He climbed to the top of his house where the water was getting dangerously deep when a rescue helicopter came by and hovered above him and let down a rope, but the man waved it away shouting, “I don’t need saving! My Lord will come”

Reluctantly, the helicopter left.

The water continued to rise and a boat came to him but, once again, the man shouted, “No! Go away! the Lord will come and save me!” and so the boat, too, went off.

Finally, a raft came by and invited him to climb aboard, but the man was deeply religious and said, “It’s all right! The Lord will save me!”

The rain continued to pour, the water continued to rise and the man drowned.

At the gates of heaven, the man met St. Peter. Confused, he asked, “Peter, I have lived the life of a faithful man – why did you not rescue me?”

“For pity sake!” St. Peter replied. “We sent you a helicopter, a boat and finally a raft! What else did you expect us to do?”

Donald Trump, it seems to me, is that raft.

Idiots led by idiots

Posted on by
Reply

This remains the single most important story of the Obama years. It highlights the incompetent ignorance of the Obama administration which is matched by the ignorant incompetence of the American media. This is by John Schindler: As Boyish Ben Rhodes Drops Truth Bombs, Obama’s Media Mask Crumbles.

Across the country, wherever people gather to talk national security, the hot topic for days now has been the New York Times Magazine’s big interview with Ben Rhodes, President Obama’s foreign policy guru-cum-salesman. Especially inside the Beltway, Mr. Rhodes’ pointed comments about his work—particularly his admissions about manipulation of the media to sell Mr. Obama’s nuclear deal with Iran—have caused a stir that’s unlikely to die down soon.

It is not just a scandal as in routine errors of misjudgement. It exposes everything that Obama has done in foreign policy as not just hollow and empty but as positively endangering the survival of the West. Australia’s national security – the entire national security of the West – is dependent on the United States so when you seen it run by far-left ideological zombies with zero background knowledge or historical understanding in any of the matters they are dealing with, it ought to terrify you. There is no one in charge who wishes to protect our interests. There is no one guarding us as we sleep. We are being sold down the river. That to my knowledge this has not been raised anywhere in Australia truly reminds me of what a sleeply hollow we are. So how was Obama able to get away with it? How could American foreign policy be left in the hands of a 38 year failed novelist with absolute zero background in international relations? Back to Mr Schindler:

Mr. Rhodes made it plain that the reporters he deals with every day—that’s the essence of his job—are idiots.

“They literally know nothing,” he explained. “The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old, and their only reporting experience consists of being around political campaigns.” It’s difficult to deny the truth of that statement, and any journalist who’s being honest won’t try. With the decline of foreign bureaus, a distressing number of those reporting on national security and foreign affairs are pretty much as Mr. Rhodes described them.

Idiots led by idiots. It is the same as the Jonathan Gruber story about how Obamacare was sold on a continuous series of outright lies that were never exposed by the media. Obama’s election and re-election occurred in exactly the same way. Everyone who paid any attention all had from the beginning understood that Obama was allowing the Iranians to secure nuclear weapons that will have devastating consequences in the years to come. And it has been a media cover up, because the media is 90% left-wing trolls.

The American economy, turning to my own expertise, is being managed at about the same level of competence, with the same level of media attention, as foreign policy. We are flying blind and if nothing is done to change direction, we will eventually crash into the side of the mountain.

Hirsi Ali discussing Donald Trump

Posted on by
2

IMG_2058

We went to see Ayaan Hirsi Ali tonight. And the only reason I asked a question was because my sciatica meant I couldn’t sit for too long so got up and stood in the queue among those with something to ask. And when my turn came, my question was this:

What advice would you give a President Donald Trump?

That was not a gotcha question. She is worried about Muslim immigration. Trump is worried about Muslim immigration. So it seemed natural to ask her what advice she would give him. This is what happened next, as I reprint the text from the note I wrote on my iPhone to a friend on the train ride home.

She went all outraged about how awful he is and gets palpitations thinking of him with his finger on the bomb. And about what a misogynist he is. So I repeated my question about what advice she would give. Same answer. She was more filled with anger at Trump than at jihad! So discouraging.

The title of her presentations, as you can see, was “Dilemmas for Liberal Society: Security & Jihad in a World of Mass Migration”. Only a percentage of us even see the issue as genuine, yet as she said right at the start, it is “the challenge of our time”. I was asking what advice she might have for the next president. As my wife said after, perhaps I should have asked what advice she would give Hillary since even the mention of Trump put her completely off her stride. I will dwell on this for a while because it spoilt my night. To quote Kant once again: if you would will the end you must will the means. I find the ends she has in mind quite obscure after all this, but how she would achieve whatever ends she intends is now completely opaque.

REPLY TO COMMENTS: Not that at this stage will anyone be reading this post who hasn’t already, and particular those who have linked to the post from Instapundit and Five Feet of Fury. (Truly extraordinary, by the way, what a link from Instapundit does for a small blog’s traffic.) But I didn’t say Hirsi Ali had directly stated that she was filled with greater anger at Trump than at jihadists. What I said was that the only time she showed deep anger during the evening was when I asked what she would say to a President Trump, which she point blank refused to answer, but instead showed genuine passion at the very idea of Trump as president and would not go to the question asked. My wife describes the moment as Hirsi Ali preferring to show her deep dislike of Trump rather than to share with the audience what advice she would give him if he became president. No one has to wish him to be president to recognise that if he were elected, he would be the one making many of the decisions that matter. And the fact is that I still don’t know what advice she would have for an incoming president, whoever it might be. And I also would like to point out that none of this is a criticism of her personally, but as a concern I often have of people who know what they like and don’t like but cannot turn their views into a coherent plan of action, including not just what to do but who they will get to do it.

Newt Gingrich discussing Donald Trump

Posted on by
Reply

This is interesting. Donald Trump Is Considering Newt Gingrich for Vice Presidential Role. And the following may give some idea why that is. I do note there is dispute about whether Gingrich really did say all that, but the points are well taken irrespective of the source.

Understanding Donald Trump
From The Washington Times, by Newt Gingrich

Donald Trump is a genuine phenomenon. He may or may not become the Republican nominee for president. He may or may not win the presidency even if he becomes the nominee. Yet it is clear that he is a phenomenon and that any history of the 2016 presidential race will have to spend a good bit of time analyzing Trump and his impact.

From the time he announced on June 16, Trump has dominated social and mainstream media. He dominates the conversation despite the lack of paid advertising. Trump says outrageous things and his supporters shrug it off. At every turn, his poll numbers continue to rise.

As a step toward understanding this amazing performance, I spent part of the Christmas break reading his first bestseller, ‘The Art of the Deal’. Written in 1987, this book is a classic among American business books and has influenced a generation of entrepreneurs. Trump wrote ‘The Art of the Deal’ when he was 41 years old and having a successful run. The book’s popularity contributed to Time Magazine’s decision to feature Donald Trump on its cover in January 1989.

The portrait that emerges from this easy-to-read and remarkably interesting book is of an aggressive, ambitious person who is constantly pushing, constantly learning, and always seeking the next challenge. Reporters and analysts who are trying to understand Trump would be well served by slowing down and reading this nearly three-decade-old bestseller.

They would discover that Donald Trump has developed a remarkable set of rules and principles that allow him to make decisions with incredible speed. Trump knows a lot, but what is amazing is how rapidly he figures out what he doesn’t know.

My favorite story is of the Wollman Skating Rink in New York’s Central Park.
The Wollman Rink was a heavily used public skating rink which had fallen into disrepair in 1980. New York City tried for six years to fix it, spent $13 million, and the rink still was not ready to open. In June of 1986 Trump, who could see the rink from his apartment, finally got tired of the embarrassment and offered to fix the rink at his own expense. At first the city turned him down because its bureaucracy did not want to be embarrassed by someone fixing something they couldn’t fix. Trump kept pushing and finally out of embarrassment the city gave in.

The key part of the story is Trump’s reaction to being put in charge. He promptly recognized that he didn’t know anything about fixing a skating rink. He asked himself who built a lot of skating rinks. “Canadians!” he concluded. He found the best Canadian ice skating rink construction company. When the Canadians flew in to assess the situation, they were amazed at how bad the city had been at solving the problem. They assured Trump that this was an easy job. Trump fixed the six year embarrassment two months ahead of schedule and nearly $800,000 under-budget. (The city did end up paying for the work, and Trump donated the profits to charity.)

After reading this chapter you begin to think that maybe Donald Trump really could build a wall along our southern border for a lot less than our current government estimates.

‘The Art of the Deal’ is filled with stories like this — stories of common sense stories of calculated risk taking, and stories of innovation and marketing. Anyone who would like to better understand Donald Trump would be helped by reading this remarkable book.

Another is his pledges and I have no way of knowing if he will make good on all of them but I do agree with all of them. Trump is the only candidate that is serious about building The Wall”! Two other important pledges Trump has made that no other candidate of either party has matched! First,deportation of millions of illegals that are demanding and costing American taxpayers billions of dollars and second, closing 34 Muslim training camps throughout our country! I WOULD LIKE TRUMP OR ANY OTHER CANDIDATES PLEDGE TO REINSTATE ANY AND ALL MILITARY OFFICERS DISCHARGED BECAUSE THEY DISAGREED WITH OBAMA OR HIS POLICIES!!

Here is another that kind of wraps up my feelings about Trump. Raccoon’s in your basement! An interesting analogy.

You’ve been on vacation for two weeks, you come home, and your basement is infested with raccoon’s. Hundreds of rabid, messy, mean raccoon’s have overtaken your basement. You want them gone immediately so you hire a guy. A pro. You don’t care if the guy smells, you need those raccoon’s gone pronto and he’s the guy to do it! You don’t care if the guy swears, you don’t care if he’s an alcoholic, you don’t care how many times he’s been married, you don’t care if he voted for Obama, you don’t care if he has plumber’s crack…you simply want those raccoon’s gone!

You want your problem fixed! He’s the guy. He’s the best. Period. That’s why we need Trump. Yes, he’s a bit of an ass. Yes, he’s an egomaniac, but you don’t care.

The country is a mess because politicians suck, the Republican Party is two-faced & gutless, illegal’s are everywhere. You want it all fixed! You don’t care that Trump is crude, you don’t care that he insults people, you don’t care that he had been friendly with Hillary, you don’t care that he has changed positions, you don’t care that he’s been married 3 times, you don’t care that he fights with Megyn Kelly and Rosie O’Donnell, you don’t care that he doesn’t know the name of some Muslin terrorist,…this country is weak, bankrupt, our enemies are making fun of us, we are being invaded by illegal’s, we are becoming a nation of victims where every Tom, Ricardo and Hamad is a special interest group with special rights to a point where we don’t even recognize the country we were born and raised in.

“AND WE JUST WANT IT FIXED” and Trump is the only guy who seems to understand what the people want.

You’re sick of politicians, sick of the Democratic Party, Republican Party, and sick of illegal’s. You just want this thing fixed. Trump may not be a saint, but doesn’t have any lobbyist money influencing him, he doesn’t have political correctness restraining him, all you know is that he has been very successful, a good negotiator, he has built a lot of things, and he’s also not a politician, so he’s not a cowardly politician. And he says he’ll fix it. You don’t care if the guy has bad hair. You just want those raccoon’s gone. Out of your house!

This one is more about why we don’t want Hillary. I think this sums it up well!

Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton are in a bar. Donald leans over, and with a smile on his face, says,
“The media are really tearing you apart for That Scandal.”
Hillary: “You mean my lying about Benghazi?”
Trump: “No, the other one.”
Hillary: “You mean the massive voter fraud?”
Trump: “No, the other one.”
Hillary: “You mean the military not getting their votes counted?”
Trump: “No, the other one.”
Hillary: “Using my secret private server with classified material to Hide my Activities?”
Trump: “No, the other one.”
Hillary: “The NSA monitoring our phone calls, emails and everything Else?”
Trump: “No, the other one.”
Hillary: “Using the Clinton Foundation as a cover for tax evasion, hiring cronies, and taking bribes from foreign countries?
Trump: “No, the other one.”
Hillary: “You mean the drones being operated in our own country without The Benefit of the law?”
Trump: “No, the other one.”
Hillary: “Giving 123 Technologies $300 Million, and right afterward it Declared Bankruptcy and was sold to the Chinese?”
Trump: “No, the other one.”
Hillary: “You mean arming the Muslim Brotherhood and hiring them in the White House?”
Trump: “No, the other one.”
Hillary: “Whitewater, Watergate committee, Vince Foster, commodity Deals?”
Trump: “No the other one:”
Hillary: “The IRS targeting conservatives?”
Trump: “No the other one:”
Hillary: “Turning Libya into chaos?”
Trump: “No the other one:”
Hillary: “Trashing Mubarak, one of our few Muslim friends?”
Trump: “No the other one:”
Hillary: “Turning our backs on Israel?”
Trump: “No the other one:”
Hillary: “The joke Iran Nuke deal? ”
Trump: “No the other one:”
Hillary: “Leaving Iraq in chaos? ”
Trump: “No, the other one.”
Hillary: “The DOJ spying on the press?”
Trump: “No, the other one.”
Hillary: “You mean HHS Secretary Sibelius shaking down health insurance Executives?”
Trump: “No, the other one.”
Hillary: “Giving our cronies in SOLYNDRA $500 MILLION DOLLARS and 3 Months Later they declared bankruptcy and then the Chinese bought it?”
Trump: “No, the other one.”
Hillary: “The NSA monitoring citizens’ ?”
Trump: “No, the other one.”
Hillary: “The State Department interfering with an Inspector General Investigation on departmental sexual misconduct?”
Trump: “No, the other one.”
Hillary: “Me, The IRS, Clapper and Holder all lying to Congress?”
Trump: “No, the other one.”
Hillary: “Threats to all of Bill’s former mistresses to keep them quiet”
Trump: “No, the other one.”
Hillary: “You means taking the $145,000,000.00 from Putin for the Uranium Bribe ? “
Trump : “ No the other one .”
Hillary: “I give up! … Oh wait, I think I’ve got it! When I stole the White House furniture, silverware and China when Bill left Office?”
Trump: “THAT’S IT! I almost forgot about that one”.
**********
Everything above is true. Yet she still gets the Democratic votes. Could there be that many stupid people in this country? Does anyone understand this? If not, I think we’re doomed!