Who is this woman, who is she talking to and what is she doing? Here’s a clue. This is the photo that accompanies an article titled, Genders split on working from home. She is apparently a woman at work from at home. And this is the first line of the article:

More women are keen to keep working from home as the COVID-19 threat recedes, while men are increasingly happy to return to the workplace.

Somehow and for some reason everything about the picture dissuades me that she is involved in some kind of productive activity, or at least productive so far as her employer is concerned. But what do I know about such things? Then there is this: Young men really are the most aggressive drivers, AAA survey says but the first line of the article makes the actual point.

Drivers aged 39 or younger are the most likely to speed and engage in other aggressive and dangerous behaviors, with men being more likely to engage in risky behavior pretty much across the board.

Women are much more risk averse. Merely looking at workplace death statistics makes it as clear as one could possibly wish to see. And then there was this: Woke women are killing marriage and dating.

This is what the far-left culture has produced: a generation of women whose anger and resentment toward men and marriage precludes them from not only having a sense of humor but from acquiring any critical thinking skills. There’s no middle ground anymore, no place for cogent conversation. It’s just hate. With so many women conditioned to believe that women are irreproachable and men are toxic, the future of marriage and family is bleak. Some women will learn, down the road, that they’ve been fed a mountain of lies. Those are the women I coach. They are in desperate need of a new relationship roadmap, one that works and that welcomes understanding the very real and very deep biological differences between the sexes.

There is also this which adds to the mass of the moment: Study: Female Academics Especially Fuel Charge To Turn Higher Ed Into Therapy.

The findings also highlighted that female professors emphasized more social justice and emotional well-being compared to their male counterparts. Academics in hard disciplines, such as business, emphasized more rigor and knowledge advancement compared to soft subjects, such as education, where professors emphasized students’ emotional well-being above all.

Most of these findings align with previous research related to sex differences in values. The paper highlights some of the past literature, which reinforced that conservatives are more in favor of ideological diversity than are liberals.

Additionally, sex differences in political orientations are also reflected in academic values: Males score higher in assertiveness and competitiveness, while females score higher in trust, anxiety, and nurturance. This is particularly similar to previous research from the Martin Center, co-authored by The Federalist’s Joy Pullmann and me, which also highlighted how sex and ideology influence different pedagogic styles and research choices, even within similar subfields.

These happen to be four stories I came across in less than a week. Women seek the safest possible environment and men do what they can to provide it. For many women, it is the government that is their main provider of income and protection. They are bitter and filled with hatreds for men, but such is life. Any male looking for a long-term relationship, such as one that ends only upon the death of one of the partners, the modern woman of the West is a very bad proposition. It is a tragedy for us all, for women as much as men.

Here is the reality as found in the movies and in the modern novel. A guy will see some Action Hero – an Arnold Schwarzenegger type – and never for a moment think he might be anything like him or even wish to be in any of the kinds of situations Arnie finds his way out of. A woman will go to the flicks or read some Mills and Boon trash and imagine that is just how it ought to be and think what she sees in the film or reads in her novels is a realistic model for how she might one day find herself within. It is a fantasy that will set her up for major disappointments and a life of misery on her own.

• Does a surveillance
  video prove Georgia
  election fraud?We would say so!
• Is the Democrats’ Election
  Heist ‘Too Big to Fail’?Nothing is too big to fail.
• Voting Machine USB Drives Had Totals
  Altered Overnight, Witness in Nevada
  Election Contest AllegesStrange things happen at night.
• Video: Georgia Vote Counters Appear to
  Pull Suitcases of Ballots from Under
  Table After Observers, Media LeaveSneaky, sneaky, sneaky.
• Joe Biden says Hunter won’t work any jobs
  that conflict with his role as presidentIf you ever get there Joe!

From Lucianne.com last night. Only we brave souls on the internet actually know what is going on, including the wilful suppression of actual news by virtually every major media organisation.

And even here, the only reason they can talk about it is because she was so overwhelmingly incompetent, and that this was an obvious stunt. But it is a reality everywhere where “diversity” overrides competence. There is no glass ceiling in football, or anywhere else.

From Instapundit and if you go to the link you will find that is exactly what they said and that it really was The World Economic Forum that said it.

THESE ARE THE PEOPLE WHO CONSIDER THEMSELVES CAPABLE OF RUNNING THE WORLD:  ‘Great Reset’: World Economic Forum Tells Public to Start Eating Weeds, Bugs, Drinking Sewage.

I would like to point out that according to any rational measure, from food availability to space availability there is no overpopulation.  I don’t know if the left knows they are lying. I do know they hate humanity and want to humiliate and exterminate us. Honestly, I’d feel better if I found out they were aliens, here to destroy us. Alas, they are human. Just resentful, twisted and evil. Probably the result of subscribing to a philosophy that makes envy a virtue.

From Instapundit

MICHAEL OREN: It Takes a Village: French World War II Drama  Un Village Francais Courageously Depicts The Country’s Holocaust Crimes, Then Whitewashes Them With Moral Equivalence.

For decades after the war, French governments from both the left and the right insisted that the true France had resided with de Gaulle in London and not with Pétain in Vichy, and that all anti-Jewish measures were imposed on them by the Germans. But beginning in 1969 with Marcel Ophuls’ documentary The Sorrow and the Pity, followed by Columbia professor Robert Paxton’s 1972 classic, Vichy France: Old Guard and New Order, and then Louis Malle’s Oscar-nominated 1973 film Lacombe Lucien, the myth steadily collapsed. These works portrayed a France that willingly collaborated with the occupation, disdained the Resistance, and sometimes surpassed the Germans in its persecution of the Jews.

Still, it took years before French authorities agreed to assist the efforts of Nazi-hunter Serge Klarsfeld to try former Vichy officials for war crimes. Not until 1995 did President Jacques Chirac finally acknowledge France’s role in the deportation of more than 75,000 Jews, most of whom didn’t return. Only in July 2017 did President Emmanuel Macron state unequivocally that “It was indeed France that organized the roundup, the deportation, and thus [the] deaths.”

Un Village Français continues this process of self-reckoning yet takes it a giant step further. The Holocaust is no longer peripheral to the occupation, but its essence. The Germans did not bring anti-Semitism to France; they gave the French license for its pursuit. Jews, according to many of the series’ characters, are dishonest, conniving, treacherous, and cheap. One of them observes, “Of course, one cannot be Jewish and French.”

This bold and still-controversial statement was the work of the series’ creator, Frédéric Krivine. He is the son of radical left-wing parents and the nephew of Alain Krivine, who was jailed by de Gaulle for leading the 1968 protests. As chief consultant for his production, the writer chose Jean-Pierre Azéma, a noted leftist historian. This no doubt explains the sentimental portrayal of the communists and the brutal depiction of every American GI. But Krivine is also Jewish and has described Un Village Français as “a good Jewish story.” But good in what way?

Clearly it cannot be in France, where the survivors see no future. For two of them, the answer is Palestine. “A land without a people for a people without a land,” one of them says, unknowingly quoting a 19th-century Christian Zionist. “I just want to live in a place without fighting.” All of this is meant ironically, though, as we see in the final season in which the now-married pair—the woman is played by Krivine’s wife, Axelle Maricq—is driving a Haganah ambulance. Ambushed by Arabs shouting “Deir Yassin! Deir Yassin!” the husband explains that this was a Palestinian village in which “our people killed two hundred innocent men, women, and children”—curiously echoing the Palestinian narrative of that event, which is strongly disputed by most Israeli historians. His wife cries, “We’re no better than those who oppressed us in France!”

Voilà. So, this, after 72 episodes, is what Un Village Français is ultimately about. Yes, we were horrible to the Jews, but look—they’re no better toward the Arabs than we were toward them. French guilt for the Holocaust can be conveniently cleansed by the invocation of supposedly equivalent Israeli wrongdoing—which must be monstrously magnified and exaggerated in order to make the equation work. Interviewed by The Nation, Frédéric Krivine compared French indifference to the plight of Jews during WWII to the Israeli public’s lack of response to the IDF’s killing of Gazans.

Far from indicting France for its Holocaust crimes, Krivine has in fact forgiven it. That message was conveyed to the 3.4 million French viewers who, on average, watched every hour of Un Village Français and to the many millions more in the 40 countries that rebroadcast it. They received first-class drama and acting, a courageous reexamination of French history—and a not-too-subliminal message about Israel being the ultimate guilty party, whose Nazi-like actions perversely cleanse the French of their own crimes in a bath of invented equivalence.

Read the whole thing.