Violence against women


The headline story in The Age today was, “Jab blitz to target city’s north, west”. And this is what it said right there on that front page.

Victorians [not women, but Victorians] who are more than 24 weeks pregnant will now be able to get priority access at state-run vaccine hubs.

Not only are they allowing it, they are recommending these vaxxations. There is, of course, also this to consider: Former Pfizer VP urges pregnant, childbearing age women not to get COVID vaccine; CDC disagrees. The date on this article is August 12, and this is what it says:

A former Pfizer executive recently advised that women of childbearing age and those who are already pregnant should consider opting out of taking the COVID-19 vaccine, but the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said this week that the vaccines are safe and don’t show an increased risk of miscarriage….

Last Wednesday, Michael Yeadon, who served as vice president and chief scientist for allergy and respiratory at Pfizer until 2011, raised some concerns about the COVID-19 vaccines use on pregnant and childbearing age women during Life Site News’ “Stop the Shot” conference, where he was one of the speakers. 

“We never, ever give experimental medicines to pregnant women,” said Yeadon, Ph.D., in a presentation. 

The pregnant people must all be well below the age where covid danger reaches its peak level. We might know a decade from now which was the actual answer. Meantime, it seems prudent, to say the least, not to give experimental medicines to pregnant women.

PLUS NOW THIS: ‘After a lot of prayer and deliberation,’ veteran ESPN reporter Allison Williams quits over company’s vaccine mandate.

“Williams revealed that the reason she is hesitant to get the COVID-19 vaccine is because she is attempting to have a second child.”

She obviously hasn’t seen the latest CDC Report, but may have seen many other things instead. 

The Welsh Guards play The Star Spangled Banner on 911+20

The New World Order is taking shape

This is beyond cynical. The real issue is what to they know they are not telling the rest of us: Members of Congress, their staffs will be exempt from Biden’s federal vaccine mandate

While President Joe Biden is using a legally questionable statute to enforce what is essentially a vaccine mandate on the American workforce, members of Congress, their staffs, and anyone who works in Congress will reportedly be exempt from the mandate.

To the above might be added this: If You Are Vaccinated and You Fear the Un-Vaccinated, You Might Be a Moron. Here’s the logic.

According to Biden the vaccines work. If you get the vaccine then you will not get Covid. Right? So if you are protected from Covid what difference does it make to you if someone else wants to take the risk of not getting vaccinated? If it will only affect the un-vaccinated then it should be none of your business if another free American chooses to not get vaccinated.

My own view is that the vaxxinated are worried that these vaxxines really will do them harm and are infuriated that anyone else should be safe from whatever downsides there are to come. Of course, there is also the cat that Kerry Chant let out of the bag: “New world order”.

An innocent slip of the tongue from the state’s chief health officer has sent some corners of the internet into a spin, led to furious commentary by fringe commentators and pricked up the ears of conspiracy theorists everywhere.

It’s also led to articles appearing in newspapers around the world.

Those three short words were: “new world order”.

Certainly a slip of the tongue and unquestionably unintentional, but there are plenty of reasons to think there is an actual intended reality behind the words

This is what doctors are not permitted to say or permitted to do

So much for free speech and open debate. First there’s this from the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency, Registered health practitioners and students: What you need to know about the COVID-19 vaccine rollout, and this is what they state (amongst other things).

‘There is no place for anti-vaccination messages in professional health practice, and any promotion of anti-vaccination claims including on social media, and advertising may be subject to regulatory action.’

And then there’s this, Australia’s TGA issues new restrictions on doctors prescribing Ivermectin

Today, the TGA, acting on the advice of the Advisory Committee for Medicines Scheduling, has placed new restrictions on the prescribing of oral ivermectin….

These changes have been introduced because of concerns with the prescribing of oral ivermectin for the claimed prevention or treatment of COVID-19. Ivermectin is not approved for use in COVID-19 in Australia or in other developed countries, and its use by the general public for COVID-19 is currently strongly discouraged by the National COVID Clinical Evidence Taskforce, the World Health Organisation and the US Food and Drug Administration.

What if there are dangers from taking the Vax and Ivermectin actually helps cure someone of Covid? Don’t worry, it only took medicine 1500 years to find out about blood circulation. 

Who’s in charge of the asylum? A bunch of tyrannical fools, that’s who

Foster's still has long neck exposed

Surely this time they have gone too far: Now they’re confiscating alcohol delivered to locked-down Australian apartments if booze volume exceeds state-sanctioned limits. You can see from the way this is written, it’s for a non-Australian audience who think Australia is run by despicable idiots.

In New South Wales — a southeastern state encompassing Sydney — alcohol deliveries to apartments under COVID-19 lockdown are being confiscated if booze volume exceeds limits mandated by the Ministry of Health, news.com.au reported.

The powers that be are enacting daily alcohol limits to “ensure the safety of health staff and residents,” the outlet added.

— and it should come as no surprise that they don’t like it….

Residents are allowed to receive a ration of one of the following: six beers or pre-mixed drinks, one bottle of wine, or one 375ml bottle of spirits.

Excess alcohol is being confiscated until lockdown rules are lifted.

Residents can consult with a clinician if they think they need more than the allowed limit.

A Sydney Local Health District spokeswoman confirmed the limits are in place in NSW Health’s Special Health Accommodation where COVID-positive patients and close contacts are sent for isolation, news.com.au reported.

Thumbnail

Anyone who is afraid to go out should sit home. The rest of us should be allowed to just get on with our lives.

The Zelenko Protocol

Donald Trump stands outside the White House giving a thumbs up

I mentioned a while back that Donald Trump while President – and thus before any of the vaxxines had been developed – had had Covid himself and was over it within a couple of days. I speculated that he might have used Ivermectin or HCQ but did not know. Apparently, he had followed what is known as The Zelenko Protocol which includes the following for “Moderate/High Risk Patients”.

  • Elemental Zinc 50-100mg once a day for 7 days
  • Vitamin C 1000mg 1 time a day for 7 days
  • Vitamin D3 10000iu once a day for 7 days or 50000iu once a day for 1-2 days
  • Azithromycin 500mg 1 time a day for 5 days or
  • Doxycycline 100mg 2 times a day for 7 days
  • Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) 200mg 2 times a day for 5-7 days and/or
  • Ivermectin 0.4-0.5mg/kg/day for 5-7 days Either or both HCQ and IVM can be used, and if one only, the second agent may be added after about 2 days of treatment if obvious recovery has not yet been observed etc.

This is what was reported at the time by our ABC: Donald Trump has finished his COVID-19 treatment, but has he recovered? He certainly has recovered, which is precisely why the ABC never again examined the story. They would rather that people should die than Donald Trump be proven right. These people are very sick puppies not to mention how evil they are.

What has happened to the supposed instinct for self preservation?

An interesting post – You’re struggling to understand where all this vaccine hesitancy comes from. Let me help you –  long and windy which eventually reaches this conclusion.

The same people who told you Brexit would never happen, that Trump would never win, that when he did win it was because of Russian collusion but also because of racism, that you must follow lockdowns while they don’t, that masks don’t work, that masks do work, that social justice protests during pandemic lockdowns are a form of “health intervention,” that ransacking African American communities in the name of fighting racism is a “mostly peaceful” form of protest, that poor and underserved children locked out of shuttered schools are “still learning,” that Jussie Smollett was a victim of a hate crime, that men are toxic, that there is an infinite number of genders, that COVID couldn’t have come from a lab until maybe it did, that closing borders is racist until maybe it isn’t, that you shouldn’t take Trump’s vaccine, that you must take the vaccine developed during the Trump administration, that Andrew Cuomo is a great leader, that Andrew Cuomo is a granny killer, that the number of COVID deaths is one thing and then another … are the same people telling you now that the vaccine is safe, that you must take it, and that if you don’t, you will be a second-class citizen.

Why does anyone still believe a thing they say?

Sounds bad. Why does no one else mention it?

From British researchers find a potential mechanism for Covid vaccine-caused heart injury

The preprint runs 26 pages and includes 56 footnotes. I am no expert on the structure and function of heart cells, but as far as I can tell it appears meticulously documented. And it paints a troubling picture: specialized blood vessel cells called pericytes have receptors called CD147s. The novel coronavirus itself (Sars-Cov-2) cannot attack these CD147s and damage the pericyte cells, potentially leading to clotting and heart attacks.

But free-floating spike protein – like the spike protein the vaccines make our bodies produce – can.

With this the conclusion.

“Importantly, we show that the recombinant S protein alone elicits cellular signalling through the CD147 receptor in cardiac [cells], thereby inducing cell dysfunction and microvascular disruption in vitro.”

Hmmm: “inducing cell dysfunction and microvascular disruption”. Sounds bad. Why does no one else mention it?

To which may be added this: The Powerful Case Against COVID mRNA ‘Vaccines’. Think about this.

There are two reasons for Covid infections.  One is the mRNA vaccine which spreads Covid. The other is the refusal of the Western medical establishment to prevent and treat Covid with HCQ or Ivermectin….

But the failure of the mRNA vaccine is far more serious than the failure to protect. The vaccine itself (1) causes illnesses and deaths identical to Covid illnesses and deaths as the massive number of deaths and health injuries in the adverse vaccine reaction databases indicate,  (2) the “vaccine” creates variants capable of escaping immune response, and (3) the vaccinated are contagious and dangerous to the unvaccinated.

In other words, the so-called breakthrough cases that are now overwhelming the most vaccinated countries are caused by vaccination.  To continue jabbing people risks such death and injury and counterproductive totalitarian policies as to lead to societal collapse.

Is this really true? From everything we have seen up till now, it is certainly possible. No actual facts we know of contradict this view of what is going on. Anyway, go to the link and read it all. Since there is nothing any of us can do, what difference will it make if we know what’s going on even while it is going on? As he asks:

Doctors and scientists  have reported the effectiveness of HCQ and Ivermectin, which have such safe records of use over decades that in countries not controlled by pharmaceutical companies they are available for over-the-counter purchase just like aspirin.  Yet the corrupt American medical establishment declares the proven preventatives and cures to be “unsafe,” and the mRNA vaccine that is spreading Covid is declared to be the answer.

What is the agenda?

And as he writes towards the end.

Healthy people face a minuscule  threat of death or serious injury from Covid.  Vulnerable people with co-morbidities can be safely and securely put on preventative doses of Ivermectin or HCQ.  There is no reason, other than pure negligence of the medical profession, for vulnerable people to even catch Covid.  There is certainly no reason for them to die because the medical profession withholds treatment with known cures.

Will the true story ever be told? And if so by whom and who will be the audience?