Category Archives: Politics – Australian

Monica Smit

Posted on by
Reply

I had never heard of Monica until now, but have just received this in an email.

If you aren’t aware of Monica Smit yet, you may want to be. Monica started Reignite Democracy Australia (RDA) last year as an individual going live on Facebook. RDA has gone from strength to strength in leaps and bounds since. Perhaps think GetUp, but RDA is nothing at all like GetUp. Monica was arrested 20 days ago on ‘incitement’ charges and has been held in isolation in a rather hardcore Melbourne prison.

RDA has become a threat to Labor (and Liberal) agendas and of the several political prisoners that have been arrested and jailed over the past year, Monica is the first woman (as I understand it). To be granted bail, RDA had to be dismantled. Monica, without a second thought, refused bail and chose to remain in prison and in forced isolation. A new bail hearing will take place on Tuesday I believe. RDA had also been in the process of registering a political party (they might have much more success in remaining a grassroots activist organisation). It reeks of the arrests of political opponents carried out in previous regimes that are supposed to exist somewhere else in a faraway land and not in Australia. 

Her partner, Morgan C Jonas (MCJ Report), is now an established journalist / presenter. His criticism of the Andrews Labor Government (and also the Morrison Government) has made him a prime target. His studio was raided shortly after  Monica’s arrest, and all of his equipment was seized. 

This is the only news report I could find on her: Anti-vaxxer and anti-lockdown activist Monica Smit charged with incitement so she really does exist.

Bail conditions magistrate Luisa Bazzani imposed included barring Ms Smit from publishing anything that could incite breaches of the health orders.

She was also ordered to follow a court-imposed curfew between 7pm and 6am and remove any material that incited opposition to the health officer’s directions within 48 hours.

“I do wish I’d known before we spent all this time on bail that your client was intending to refuse to sign a bail order,” Ms Bazzani said.

At least 4000 people went to the August 21 rally held in the Melbourne CBD, and Ms Smit is alleged to have encouraged people to attend the protests through authoring and transmitting posts on the encrypted Telegram app, prosecutor Anthony Albore told the court.

A black day in Melbourne’s history

Posted on by
1

In 2014 we elect a premier whose most saleable campaign promise is that he will eliminate rail crossings at major intersections. And then, by chance, he is still premier when Covid becomes a worldwide pandemic and he’s in charge of the Victorian response. So this is where we are now at.

Looks more like a rugby crowd than Aussie Rules.

Ivermectin pro and con

Posted on by
1

With the emphasis on the the word con in all its various meanings: New restrictions on prescribing ivermectin for COVID-19. Dated September 10, 2021.

Today, the TGA, acting on the advice of the Advisory Committee for Medicines Scheduling, has placed new restrictions on the prescribing of oral ivermectin. General practitioners are now only able to prescribe ivermectin for TGA-approved conditions (indications) – scabies and certain parasitic infections. Certain specialists including infectious disease physicians, dermatologists, gastroenterologists and hepatologists (liver disease specialists) will be permitted to prescribe ivermectin for other unapproved indications if they believe it is appropriate for a particular patient.

There is then this one might consider: From Glasgow protesters gather for ‘right to try’ different treatments.

Tonya Adams says she was treated by Dr. Turner using ivermectin and claims the treatment saved her life.

“I almost didn’t make it. He prescribed me the ivermectin–without the regimen he gave me I wouldn’t be here today,” said Adams.

Bureaucrats are people with no skin in any game they oversee. That has got to change.

Is it murder to withhold medication that would cure them from someone with an illness?

Posted on by
1

This is the story at the link: Australia admits it is banning ivermectin for COVID because it interferes with universal vaccine agenda. That is, since Ivermetin will stop Covid in its tracks, no one would be vaxxed if Ivermectin weren’t banned by the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). As it says in the post:

There are a number of significant public health risks associated with taking ivermectin in an attempt to prevent COVID-19 infection rather than getting vaccinated. Individuals who believe that they are protected from infection by taking ivermectin may choose not to get tested or to seek medical care if they experience symptoms. Doing so has the potential to spread the risk of COVID-19 infection throughout the community.”

That’s it! That is the reason they not only oppose ivermectin here and in Australia, but oppose hydroxychloroquine, budesonide, fenofibrate, and any and all forms of preventive and outpatient treatment. Doctors have even told me they have had prescriptions blocked by pharmacists for antibiotics or prednisone, if they think they are being used for COVID. This is the most evident admission yet from the Australian government that it can’t afford to get rid of the virus with something so cheap because it will obviate the need for the vaccine … and the totalitarian agenda accompanying it.

Then there’s this which comes next:

Officials don’t like the dosage being used by doctors prescribing for COVID. “Secondly, the doses of ivermectin that are being advocated for … are significantly higher than those approved and found safe for scabies or parasite treatment,” writes the TGA in the press release. “These higher doses can be associated with serious adverse effects, including severe nausea, vomiting, dizziness, neurological effects such as dizziness, seizures and coma.”

Which, even if true, has an obvious solution which is to prescribe dosage levels which do not lead to harm. But as pointed out:

Studies have already been done for years showing that ivermectin is safe to take at much higher doses than the 0.2-0.6 mgs per kilogram of weight that most doctors are prescribing. A 2002 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ivermectin use for head lice in Miami found zero evidence of toxicity even for people talking 30-120 mgs of ivermectin, exponentially higher than any COVID dosing.

Lastly, Ivermectin has become so popular, that there are shortages developing to treat people who have scabies and other non-fatal parasitic diseases. This is the TGA speaking:

“Finally, there has been a 3-4-fold increased dispensing of ivermectin prescriptions in recent months, leading to national and local shortages for those who need the medicine for scabies and parasite infections.”

So it’s safe for scabies but not for Covid. And no one is worrying about overdoses here.

The final sentence:

If ivermectin is guilty of something, it’s that it actually works.

If we’re looking for the guilty party, it’s the TGA.

Painting lipstick on a pig, Victorian version

Posted on by
1

This is an article about how Daniel Andrews’s despicable nature has been painted over and hidden: Digital Dan’s ex-social media guru reveals his secrets (that’s the actual headline on the paper, not online btw). This is the kind of work required to disguise someone who may be the most repulsive political leader in Australian history.

Dan Andrews’ Father's Day Twitter post.

His decisions have led to hundreds of deaths because of the Covid (850 out of Australia’s total number of covid deaths which are around 1100). He has massacred the Victorian economy whose public sector will be unable to pay its bills. He has no conception of how an economy works and is an ideologically empty vessel who has transformed Melbourne from the most livable city in the world to a backwater.

Compulsory vaxxination is unconstitutional in Australia

Posted on by
Reply

Received this from a friend who received it from someone else.

Reality will hit soon for State governments trying to impose no-go for the unvaccinated.
 
The Australian Constitution Section 53.23a bans Mandatory Vaccination under the Constitutional Guarantee and Civil Conscription bans enforced vaccination and refusal of service. 
 
According to the explanation by Melbourne barrister Darren Dixon, this cannot be overruled by any State government (not even WA!) and has been in case law for many years. 
 
Nothing about this will be changed, there are many examples in case law.
 
It negates any State attempt to enforce Covid vaccination or to refuse entry or service or use of an App.
 
Scomo has written about this and backs it.
 
Commonwealth law since the Referendum in 1946.
 
Melb Barrister Darren Dixon explains it here: Australian High Court Rules The Constitution BANS Mandatory Vaccination.
 
 
Whether this outlaws vaxxination passports is another thing altogether.

Violence against women

Posted on by
Reply


The headline story in The Age today was, “Jab blitz to target city’s north, west”. And this is what it said right there on that front page.

Victorians [not women, but Victorians] who are more than 24 weeks pregnant will now be able to get priority access at state-run vaccine hubs.

Not only are they allowing it, they are recommending these vaxxations. There is, of course, also this to consider: Former Pfizer VP urges pregnant, childbearing age women not to get COVID vaccine; CDC disagrees. The date on this article is August 12, and this is what it says:

A former Pfizer executive recently advised that women of childbearing age and those who are already pregnant should consider opting out of taking the COVID-19 vaccine, but the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said this week that the vaccines are safe and don’t show an increased risk of miscarriage….

Last Wednesday, Michael Yeadon, who served as vice president and chief scientist for allergy and respiratory at Pfizer until 2011, raised some concerns about the COVID-19 vaccines use on pregnant and childbearing age women during Life Site News’ “Stop the Shot” conference, where he was one of the speakers. 

“We never, ever give experimental medicines to pregnant women,” said Yeadon, Ph.D., in a presentation. 

The pregnant people must all be well below the age where covid danger reaches its peak level. We might know a decade from now which was the actual answer. Meantime, it seems prudent, to say the least, not to give experimental medicines to pregnant women.

PLUS NOW THIS: ‘After a lot of prayer and deliberation,’ veteran ESPN reporter Allison Williams quits over company’s vaccine mandate.

“Williams revealed that the reason she is hesitant to get the COVID-19 vaccine is because she is attempting to have a second child.”

She obviously hasn’t seen the latest CDC Report, but may have seen many other things instead. 

This is what doctors are not permitted to say or permitted to do

Posted on by
1

So much for free speech and open debate. First there’s this from the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency, Registered health practitioners and students: What you need to know about the COVID-19 vaccine rollout, and this is what they state (amongst other things).

‘There is no place for anti-vaccination messages in professional health practice, and any promotion of anti-vaccination claims including on social media, and advertising may be subject to regulatory action.’

And then there’s this, Australia’s TGA issues new restrictions on doctors prescribing Ivermectin. 

Today, the TGA, acting on the advice of the Advisory Committee for Medicines Scheduling, has placed new restrictions on the prescribing of oral ivermectin….

These changes have been introduced because of concerns with the prescribing of oral ivermectin for the claimed prevention or treatment of COVID-19. Ivermectin is not approved for use in COVID-19 in Australia or in other developed countries, and its use by the general public for COVID-19 is currently strongly discouraged by the National COVID Clinical Evidence Taskforce, the World Health Organisation and the US Food and Drug Administration.

What if there are dangers from taking the Vax and Ivermectin actually helps cure someone of Covid? Don’t worry, it only took medicine 1500 years to find out about blood circulation. 

Who’s in charge of the asylum? A bunch of tyrannical fools, that’s who

Posted on by
3

Foster's still has long neck exposed

Surely this time they have gone too far: Now they’re confiscating alcohol delivered to locked-down Australian apartments if booze volume exceeds state-sanctioned limits. You can see from the way this is written, it’s for a non-Australian audience who think Australia is run by despicable idiots.

In New South Wales — a southeastern state encompassing Sydney — alcohol deliveries to apartments under COVID-19 lockdown are being confiscated if booze volume exceeds limits mandated by the Ministry of Health, news.com.au reported.

The powers that be are enacting daily alcohol limits to “ensure the safety of health staff and residents,” the outlet added.

— and it should come as no surprise that they don’t like it….

Residents are allowed to receive a ration of one of the following: six beers or pre-mixed drinks, one bottle of wine, or one 375ml bottle of spirits.

Excess alcohol is being confiscated until lockdown rules are lifted.

Residents can consult with a clinician if they think they need more than the allowed limit.

A Sydney Local Health District spokeswoman confirmed the limits are in place in NSW Health’s Special Health Accommodation where COVID-positive patients and close contacts are sent for isolation, news.com.au reported.

Thumbnail

Anyone who is afraid to go out should sit home. The rest of us should be allowed to just get on with our lives.