Self interest – nothing quite like it for clearing the mind

From Millennials Like Socialism — Until They Get Jobs.

A Reason-Rupe poll found that while millennials still on their parents’ health-insurance policies supported the idea of paying higher premiums to help cover the uninsured (57 percent), support flipped among millennials paying for their own health insurance with 59 percent opposed to higher premiums.

When tax rates are not explicit, millennials say they’d prefer larger government offering more services (54 percent) to smaller government offering fewer services (43 percent). However when larger government offering more services is described as requiring high taxes, support flips and 57 percent of millennials opt for smaller government with fewer services and low taxes, while 41 percent prefer large government.

Lasched to the massed

The article starts with the obligatory anti-Trump statement but once you get past the opening the text is not anti-Trump at all. Christopher Lasch is one of my favourite writers of all time and the article is Donald Trump and the Ghost of Christopher Lasch. So get past the opening with its “Trump would be the end of the world as we know it” to read this:

In The Revolt of the Elites Lasch foresaw the disconnect between the nation’s political classes and the governed, as UCLA law professor Stephen Bainbridge has recently observed. America’s elites have devoted so much energy to building their collective moral system that they expect ideological obedience. When Trumpists say strong families in the 1950s were a positive, the cognoscenti respond: “So what. It was a terrible time for minorities and gays.”

Trump’s armies feel the sting of comfortable, upscale, post-industrial winners who can barely conceal their contempt for those they dismiss as Wal-Mart people. The disdain for yeoman America—which is overwhelmingly white—is visceral, longstanding, and profound.

“Middle Americans, as they appear to the makers of educated opinion, are hopelessly shabby, unfashionable, and provincial, ill informed about changes in taste or intellectual trends, addicted to trashy novels of romance and adventure, and stupefied by prolonged exposure to television,” Lasch wrote in 1995, not yesterday. “They are at once absurd and vaguely menacing.”

And why does this matter?

As Lasch anticipated, the nation’s ruling classes style themselves to be citizens of the world, living in “a global bazaar” to be savored indiscriminately, “with no questions asked and no commitments required.” From Pacific Palisades to Cambridge, far from the madding crowd, well-heeled transnational citizens of the world may hold assets in Singapore or the Cayman Islands. Their identities are post-national. Amid the affluence, obsequious Third World helpers work at minimum wage or off the books, doing the scut work and producing an exotic, multicultural vibe as a bonus.

Abandoning the left’s original intent to protect the common man, Lasch observed, progressives chose instead to pursue diversity, secularism, and cultural revolution. Families, schools, and churches were left behind. For thought leaders, family values, mindless patriotism, religious fundamentalism, white racism, homophobia, and retrograde views of women stood in the way of progress.

Progress should, of course, be written as “progress”. And so how do those elites think, and remember this is Lasch who was writing this two decades ago:

For progressive elites, delicate moral confections and debatable ethical positions became acts of faith. “It is no longer necessary to argue with opponents on intellectual grounds or to enter into their point of view,” Lasch pointed out. “It is enough to dismiss them as Eurocentric, racist, sexist, homophobic – in other words, as politically suspect.” When these novel moral systems are challenged, Lasch added, progressives react with “venomous hatred,” the toxic ill feeling that seems abundant in the 2016 election year.

Go to the link and read it all right through to the end, which is not an attempt to dissuade anyone from voting for Trump.

A Trump victory of course is “impossible.” It would require a massive, almost unimaginable white, yeoman flight from the Democratic Party. It is quite likely that we are even now experiencing Peak Trump. But “impossible” now stands in quotes.

And my congratulations to the author, Gilbert Sewall, for putting this together in just such a way that it has been featured at Instapundit, by Ed Driscoll who would have understood it perfectly, but also at Powerline which perhaps was uploaded by Steve Hayward, but I doubt any of the others. Our elites are ruining the world and the only thing that might save them and us is this revolt from below.

Hillary Clinton and the rights of the unborn

Can you see why everyone was upset with this from Hillary Clinton? More particularly, why did it upset so many of those on the left?

Democratic primary front-runner Hillary Clinton ran afoul of both the pro-life and pro-choice sides of the abortion debate Sunday when she said constitutional rights do not apply to an “unborn person” or “child.” . . .

Mrs. Clinton also said “there is room for reasonable kinds of restrictions” on abortion during the third trimester of pregnancy.

Here’s the reason they were upset.

Describing the fetus as a “person” or “child” has long been anathema to the pro-choice movement, which argues the terms misleadingly imply a sense of humanity.

In addition, the specific term “person” is a legal concept that includes rights and statuses that the law protects, including protection of a person’s life under the laws against homicide. Pro-choice intellectuals have long said that even if an unborn child is a “life,” it is not yet a “person.”

See the distinction?  You may think this is sick and depraved, but what do you know? You have to be a constitutional scholar or an intellectual to understand these things.

Even an old pro like Hillary can’t get it right even after all these years, although you may be sure this is nothing but a passing moment on her way to the White House. I only mention it as a reminder of the extent to which the media makes everything into a sensation when it want to get you. But with those it supports you hardly hear a sound. I point this out just so you know which side you are on when you buy into American politics. Because if these eight months old “fetuses” are actually persons with constitutional rights – you know, actual real people – then perhaps some of you were just a tad harsh the other day in your judgements of what nameless others had been saying on this very issue. Not that he was necessarily right, but only that you are picking up your cues from George Soros and The New York Times.

I always see a movie when I have popcorn

If they didn’t blend as well as they did, this near-century relationship between popcorn and the movies would not have endured. It is obviously not just a fad. The main point of this fascinating video is that movies only became part of our way of life in the way they did because of the popcorn concessions in each cinema. Since I never see a film without a box of popcorn and a Diet Coke, I am the last person alive to think this is untrue. But it would be amazing if it is true.

Powerline comes to Melbourne

melbourne by hinderaker
John Hinderaker, one of the four at Powerline, has just been visiting Australia and mostly Melbourne. He calls his post Back from the Outback which is not technically correct if you are visiting mostly Melbourne and a little of Sydney, but never mind: his final words of the post make up for everything:

Don’t be surprised if I refer to Australia from time to time in the future. It requires a rather epic journey to get there, but the trip is well worth it.

And not just a place to visit either since, for now at least, it is officially the most liveable city in the world as well.

The problem is that most people are too young to remember the world before it went insane

ivanka and children

My thoughts on the photo story of Ivanka Trump, her husband and children in a normal mother, father, kids relationship, on the day she came home with their third child. It is just like how it used to be. And then there is the picture of Donald Trump with his grandchildren having an Easter lunch. Many people can any longer relate to such a world.

trump with grandchildren

An Easter parable

islamic shopkeeper murdered

I saw the story in only one other place. This is from Mark Steyn:

In the spirit of the season, Asad Shah, a Glasgow newsagent and a “devout Muslim”, decided to send out an Easter greeting on his Facebook page:

GOOD FRIDAY AND VERY HAPPY EASTER, ESPECIALLY TO MY BELOVED CHRISTIAN NATION X! BISMILLAH…

Let’s Follow The Real Footstep Of Beloved Holy Jesus Christ (PBUH) And Get The Real Success In Both Worlds xxxx

Less than four hours after this ecumenical greeting, Mr Shah was savagely murdered outside his shop by his co-religionists:

The victim was found seriously injured on Minard Road, Glasgow, and was taken to the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital where he later died on Thursday.

An eyewitness, who did not want to be named, told the Daily Record: “As I drove past I saw two men standing over the victim.

“One was stamping on his head. There was a pool of blood on the ground. It was horrific.”

A 32-year-old Muslim man has been arrested.

We can then supplement that with this: Liberal Teacher Takes In Muslim Refugee, His Colleague Finds What’s Left Of Him. Here’s what you need to know:

Celle Heute reports that when Mehdi didn’t show up for work, one of his co-workers went to check on him. After searching the home in February, he discovered what looked like a trail of blood leading to the basement. It was there that the colleague found Mehdi butchered and lying dead in a pool of his own blood.

Murdered by the very migrant for whom he cared, Mehdi’s tolerance for the 58-year-old Afghan refugee came “full swing” when police say they got into an “argument,” according to Bild. Upset that Mehdi, the man who gave him everything, simply disagreed with him, the unidentified asylum seeker took a rock and a large metal instrument and bashed the teacher’s head to a bloody pulp. He then dragged the mutilated body down to the basement in an attempt to cover up his gruesome crime.

And why don’t we know what we are dealing with? Perhaps this from the same story might help:

Although the migrant suspect was arrested last Thursday, German police were hesitant to give out many details, including the man’s Afghan origin or his legal status. Throughout Europe, many officials have failed to report key statistics, hoping to protect Muslim migrants’ image and their own leftist agenda.

If you trust the media to know what is going on, you will live to regret it. Same for the governments under which we live. With nowhere to turn to, you might have a look at this: “Europe might be dying”. There’s no might be about it, and it’s not just Europe.

ISIS is not a group it’s an ideology

The central problem is that the smug European/Western mentality believes that what he seeks is an impossibility. Hardly any story there at the link and the title is inane: We talked to an ex-ISIS fighter in Belgium, and what he said was chilling. It’s not chilling to him; it’s what he is willing to die for.

His dream to “live underneath an Islamic caliphate, underneath Islamic law” would soon become a reality in Europe. ISIS’s brand of militant Islam would not be denied, he said, because “ISIS is not a group, it’s an ideology.”

And just what is it that will prevent this from coming true, do you think, over let us say the next sixty years?

We have had a declaration of war and we know their war aims: Islamic State video calls for jihad after Brussels blasts.

“Every Muslim who is well aware of the history of Islam, knows that the holy war against infidels is an integral part of Islam, and those who read history would know.”

And those who do not read history can watch as it happens around them as they sleep. All that stands between you and this kind of fate is a billionaire property developer from New York who our elites disdain because he is not one of them. See the ISIS recruitment video below in which the voice of Donald Trump shines as the only piece of sanity found anywhere in this horrific mess.

Do you think that just maybe he’s on to something?

This was published on January 27 in The New York Times: Donald Trump Finds New City to Insult: Brussels. It opens:

He incensed Paris and London by saying that some of their neighborhoods were so overrun with radicals that the police were too scared to enter.

He raised Scottish tempers by threatening to pull the plug on his investments there, including his luxury golf courses, if British politicians barred him from entering Britain.

Now Donald J. Trump has upset the already beleaguered people of Belgium, calling its capital, Brussels, “a hellhole.”

Asked by the Fox Business Network anchor Maria Bartiromo about the feasibility of his proposal to bar foreign Muslims from entering the United States, Mr. Trump argued that Belgium and France had been blighted by the failure of Muslims in these countries to integrate.

“There is something going on, Maria,” he said. “Go to Brussels. Go to Paris. Go to different places. There is something going on and it’s not good, where they want Shariah law, where they want this, where they want things that — you know, there has to be some assimilation. There is no assimilation. There is something bad going on.”

Warming to his theme, he added that Brussels was in a particularly dire state. “You go to Brussels — I was in Brussels a long time ago, 20 years ago, so beautiful, everything is so beautiful — it’s like living in a hellhole right now,” Mr. Trump continued.

Feel free to go to the link and continue from there.

[From SmallDeadAnimals]

What now?

brussels terrorists

We all know the news:

EXPLOSIONS ROCK BRUSSELS AIRPORT, SUBWAY…
‘Allahu Akbar’…
RAIDS UNDERWAY ACROSS BELGIUM…
‘Shocking’ Unpreparedness…
INTERIOR MINISTER: ‘Never could have imagined something of this scale’…
Brussels Ran Ad Mocking Notion of Islamic Violence 2 Months Ago…
FLASHBACK: ISIS Says Paris ‘Start of Storm’…
MAG: Islamic State Overwhelming European Counterterrorism Forces…
Geert Wilders: ‘We Ain’t Seen Nothin Yet’…
Belgium beefs up security at nuke plants…
Aftermath footage shows terrified travelers cowering behind suitcases…
Europe vows to defend democracy on ‘black day’…
American missionaries, military family among wounded…
Attack narrowly missed two visiting U.S. Senators…
Attacks Fuel Debate Over Migrants in Fractured Europe…

The real questions are, what do they want and what do we do?

AND THE VIEWS OF DONALD TRUMP: From Piers Morgan and in The Daily Mail: When it comes to terror, isn’t it time we started listening seriously to Trump?

Trump told me countries must tighten their borders in light of these terror attacks, especially to anyone related to an ISIS fighter in Syria.

Is he so wrong?

He told me he wants law-abiding Muslims to root out the extremists in their midst, expressing his bafflement and anger that someone like Abdeslam was able to hide for so long in the very part of Brussels he had previously lived.

Is he so wrong?

He told me America must make it far harder for illegal immigrants to enter the U.S. and thinks European countries should follow suit.

Is he so wrong?

He told me he believes there are now areas of many major European cities which have become poisonous breeding grounds for radicalized Islamic terror.

Is he so wrong?

Or we could just stand still and do nothing.