Who will save us from the experts?

There are two articles paired at Instapundit that really do capture the Brexit moment. The first is It’s Time for the Elites to Rise Up Against the Ignorant Masses which is exactly what the article is about and is offered without the slightest sense of irony or humility. Here is the para that captures it all:

The Republican Party, already rife with science-deniers and economic reality-deniers, has thrown itself into the embrace of a man who fabricates realities that ignorant people like to inhabit.

These are the experts: global warmists and Keynesians! Who would trust such expertise? Reading the comments at Instapundit shows the level of distrust with such people. Here are a couple:

It’s funny how they keep harping on Nigel Farage supposedly lying to the British voters in order to win their votes. The nerve of such people! Why, progressives and neofeudalists would never dare do such a thing!

Ted Kennedy, on the 1965 immigration: “The bill will not flood our cities with immigrants. It will not upset the ethnic mix of our society. It will not relax the standards of admission. It will not cause American workers to lose their jobs.”

Ted Kennedy, on the 1986 amnesty: “This amnesty will give citizenship to only 1.1 to 1.3 million illegal aliens. We will secure the borders henceforth. We will never again bring forward another amnesty bill like this.”

Yet suddenly Leftists are insisting on truth in advertising laws for politicians. If they want to roll back every left-wing lie of the last six decades they can gladly have a redo on Thursday’s vote.

And then there’s this:

Homogeneous societies are happier. They have much higher social trust and a good deal more willingness and less resentment in looking after their have-nots. Multi cultural societies rob people of a true sense of belonging. The lions share of what is good in life has nothing to do with money and economics. A nation is more than just a souless shopping mall packed with culturally atomized individuals. The elites are indifferent to the cultural destruction they have wrought in their blindered pursuit of a few more pieces of silver and a lot more centralized control. Globalization is a disaster of epic proportions. It can only end in tyranny.

All right. One more:

I *do* believe in reason, expertise, and the lessons of history. However, the “elite” are more wedded to their delusions and power than any of the above. Fer crissake, the people who claim to be “believers” in evolution are now pushing the idea that “male” and “female” are entirely learned! Their learning the “lessons of history” is to ignore the lesson of WWII — when lunatics promise to kill you *BELIEVE THEM*!

And expertise? At what? Fraud, extortion, ginning up hatred? Keeping their hands clean of the violence they incite? At laundering money for their elections through an “education” system that leaves those most in need of an education barely literate and trained to hate?

OK. Another, they are so addictive.

“Science deniers”? Which party thinks “male” and “female” are learned traits and surgically alterable? Which clings to a prediction of ever-rising temperatures despite more than a decade of no change? Which clings to a demonization of CO2 when there simply isn’t any more energy CO2 can “trap”?

There is expertise in how to fix a broken sewer pipe. There is similarly expertise in how to take out an appendix. But expert opinion on social, political and economic issues? I’m afraid that wherever self-interest plays a hand in the decisions of experts, their reliability is not to be trusted. Which is why a democratic process, where the rulers must seek the endorsement of the ruled, remains the only way a modern society should be run.

The Secret Service is no longer so secret

From the comments to the video which I happen to think is accurate:

Why would she be worried about what this guy got to say. He is only repeating lies about the Clinton’s that has been going around the right wing for years. It not going to change anyone minds but it will get a bunch of conservative to go out a spend their money on the same book just with a different cover.

That is, it’s an old story, untrue, and even if it were true is anyway irrelevant. How will it change anyone’s mind about her fitness for President? First there needs to be people on her side who are willing to believe any of this matters, and on her side there is hardly a one.

Voting strategies

I just thought I would open the question up on how to vote in the election on Saturday. Not at all straightforward, either in the House or the Senate. The only indispensable piece of information required is this list of Who Voted for Malcolm Turnbull. And while the first issue is whether to put the Libs candidate ahead of Labor’s in the House, there are many other questions after that. Should we go about punishing treachery and if so how? As a starter, one might consult John Stone’s Voting Guide.

And perhaps to help you decide for yourself, there is this survey you can fill in to work things out: Who Should I Vote For courtesy of The Sydney Morning Herald.

Is it possible to be too cynical in politics?

We shall see what Brexit means to this modern generation even among those who supported it. When it comes to politics one can never be too cynical. See below.

From John Derbyshire:

@hen Britain is at last out of the EU, will her leaders finally get control over Third World immigration? It’s by no means certain.

Following the announcement by Prime Minister David Cameron that he will resign, there is speculation that he’ll be replaced by Boris Johnson, the former Mayor of London, who campaigned for Brexit.

Well, it’s nice that Johnson helped to make Brexit happen. But on immigration in general, he apparently favors open borders. When Mayor of London he made gushing speeches about what a gorgeous ethnic tapestry the city has become. [Boris Johnson’s acceptance speech after being declared mayor of London, The Guardian, May 3, 2008]

We must now wait upon events.

Trade occurs when your goods are cheaper than theirs and their goods are simultaneously cheaper than yours

GWB’s Secretary of the Treasury has endorsed Hillary Clinton for President. Mostly known for falling to his knees in front of Nancy Pelosi to beg her to pass his bailout. A globalist clown and clueless in the way only a merchant banker can be. But it is this in particular that I wish to bring to your attention.

Paulson insists that “it’s wrong to tell the American people” that we achieve economic success by “walling ourselves off from the remaining 7 billion people and the markets they represent”.

This is the mentality that has caused modern economics to descend to the economic stupidities of the Mercantilists. A favourable balance of trade, and the import of gold, was the aim of every government. The aim was to sell and bring in gold. The value of the rest of the world’s economy to Paulson, and I suppose quite a few others, is that they will buy what you produce. I suppose it is true that you can only buy from others if you first sell. But that is not the point he is making. It is the selling that is the benefit. Exporting is what they think makes you wealthy.

So let me point out that the reason to export is to import what you cannot produce as cheaply as others. It is not done to create jobs, which will be created in any case. And it is not done to build up foreign exchange, which is economically useless unless it is spent.

Because the fact is that unless they buy from you they cannot sell to you. If the people you trade with are as crazy as Paulson, they will break their necks to sell and trade will go on without anyone having to do a thing. Without deliberately raising tariffs and other forms of protection, I wonder how it is even possible to wall off the US economy, or any economy, from everyone else. If your goods are cheaper than theirs, and their goods are simultaneously cheaper than yours – which is the paradox of trade how both can happen at the same time – trade will just go on without anyone else having to do a thing.

You might actually go into the link to see just how hopelessly out of it the people at the top of our economic tree are.

The deeper meaning of Brexit

Brexit feels like a genuine turning point for the better of some significance. Not just unexpected in the sense of not forecast, but unexpected because we social conservatives expect the world to blunder from one low point to the next. Perhaps a false dawn, but at least it has the look of a brighter possible future. It is why those of us on the Brexit side are as happy as we are, since nothing like this has been on anyone’s radar for quite some time.

And if the young really think that this is for them to decide and not for anyone who will not share their glorious future in the latter half of the century, then their shallowness is all the more profound, since they are not counting in all of the generations past who have made England what it is. This is from James Delingpole who said it better than anyone on the day before the vote was taken.

My American friends asked me the other day what exactly I meant by Britishness. For me, though, all it means is a heartfelt sympathy with our island story – 1066; Magna Carta; the Civil War; the Glorious Revolution; Waterloo; 1940 “Our Finest Hour”; and so on; and an appreciation of the achievements of the heroes and heroines who made it possible, from Alfred the Great through to Queen Elizabeth I, from Shakespeare to Elgar, from Florence Nightingale and Isambard Kingdom Brunel to Churchill and Margaret Thatcher.

My grandparents had been born in Poland and I grew up in Canada. But when I went to Agincourt and Crécy in 2014, I was celebrating battles that WE had won, just as I felt as I travelled along the Western Front towards Paris, visiting Fromelles and Vimy Ridge where WE – this time an Australian and Canadian WE – had fought. The great tragedy for our young is that they do not have any of this tradition made part of them. But some of them do and some of it is left and some of it will continue. We speak English and still read Shakespeare in Australia for a reason. Sydney and Melbourne are named after two peers of the realm. I live in Victoria. We have a heritage and a tradition that goes back a thousand years to the British Isles which is, of course, married to an indigenous tradition as well. Brexit has salvaged some of that for the future. It will now be up to others either to throw it away for no possible gain I can see, or preserve our past and our history for themselves and for those who come long after.