And there is plenty of stupid going around

iriny is wasted on the stupid

You know, no one thinks that Obama and Hillary really did set up ISIS. Saying so is kind of a metaphor for geopolitical incompetence of the most extraordinary kind. If they had not blundered as they had across the middle east, and in particular in Iraq and Libya, ISIS would never have formed, or if formed, would never have reached the kind of extension it now has. The above sentiment therefore comes with this one:

sarcasm because beating the crap out of people is illegal

The problem is, if you are among those who are irony-free, you won’t see the point. And while there is some satisfaction in laughing at you, the reality is that when stupid reaches the highest levels of political decision making, there is nothing really to laugh about.

From the same people who brought you Malcolm Turnbull

The Australian – a Murdoch paper – has a supplement on the American Election. Not all that neutral, as you can see by clicking the link. But in case you cannot be bothered, here is what you see right after the intro:

President Obama said Republican nominee Donald Trump is “unfit” to be president and questioned why top GOP lawmakers continued to endorse Trump for the White House while denouncing his actions.

Which comes with the following video:

The power of self-deception within the media class is extraordinary. They pass off their shallow and subjective valuations as deeply considered objective truths. This from The New York Times is almost beyond parody: Trump Is Testing the Norms of Objectivity in Journalism. That the media fail this test in every single election is neither here nor there. That they believe they are objective is the true idiocy. Let me quote:

If you’re a working journalist and you believe that Donald J. Trump is a demagogue playing to the nation’s worst racist and nationalistic tendencies, that he cozies up to anti-American dictators and that he would be dangerous with control of the United States nuclear codes, how the heck are you supposed to cover him?

Because if you believe all of those things, you have to throw out the textbook American journalism has been using for the better part of the past half-century, if not longer, and approach it in a way you’ve never approached anything in your career. If you view a Trump presidency as something that’s potentially dangerous, then your reporting is going to reflect that. You would move closer than you’ve ever been to being oppositional. That’s uncomfortable and uncharted territory for every mainstream, nonopinion journalist I’ve ever known, and by normal standards, untenable.

Uncharted territory!!! What a bunch of self-deluded bozos these media people are.

In the American election, which side do you suppose The Australian takes?

See if you can guess. The Australian – a Murdoch paper – has a supplement on the American Election. Not all that neutral, as you can see by clicking the link. But in case you cannot be bothered, here is what you see right after the intro:

President Obama said Republican nominee Donald Trump is “unfit” to be president and questioned why top GOP lawmakers continued to endorse Trump for the White House while denouncing his actions.

Which comes with the following video:

The Oz also went for Turnbull which shows you how out to lunch these people are. Really absolute fools.

It would be a lesson to us all if only we knew what the lesson was

From A Socialist Les Miserables in Venezuela but picked up at Instapundit. It is, of course, virtually never in the media since it exposes the disastrous result of running an economy on socialist “principles”. But what I find far more remarkable is that even where it is reported, the reporters can never explain what has gone wrong. It’s not that they know but won’t say. It is because they literally do not know what has gone wrong.

A mob of starving people advanced on the presidential palace chanting, “We want food”. They were met by soldiers and police dispatched by the tyrant from his lavish palace decorated opulently with a golden sun, giant rock crystal mirrors, sparkling chandeliers and towering oil portraits.

The scene wasn’t 19th century France, but 21st century Venezuela.

And if you are wondering why you haven’t seen it on the news, it’s because Venezuela is a Socialist disaster area that was once being used as a model by the left. Now it’s a place where the vast majority of people can’t afford basic food staples and a third are down to two or fewer meals a day.

Obama laughed and joked with deceased monster Hugo Chavez, who handed him a copy of the anti-American tract, “Open Veins of Latin America” that had even been disavowed by its own author. Obama called the book a “nice gesture”, but Eduardo Galeano, its author, had told an audience that the left “commits grave errors” when in power.

Venezuela, once a wealthy oil state, where the doctors offering “universal health care” have no medicine and starving people loot government stores looking for food, is yet another example. 50 people are dead in the latest food riots. Their graves are yet another “grave error” of the left.

Obama has not appeared too concerned at the meltdown in Venezuela. Unlike Syria, there are no threats of intervention to remove Maduro, Chavez’s successor, and the rest of the leftist regime illegally clinging to power while slaughtering Venezuelans, smuggling drugs and aiding terrorists.

When Hugo Chavez was killed by the wonders of Cuban medicine, a remedy that American leftists recommend to others while they obtain the best private health care for their own ailments, Obama offered a vague statement of support calling Chavez’s passing, “challenging”.

It was certainly that.

But the question remains, what did they do wrong? It will have to remain a mystery, I’m afraid even as something like a quarter of American voters wanted to make Bernie Sanders president.

A free press and an informed public

hillry climbing stairs

Talking American politics with anyone who does not look at various right-of-centre blogs is a depressing experience. The picture is from this blog: SHOCK PHOTO: Multiple staffers help unstable Hillary up stairs where it was found on Drudge which carries the story further.

And then there’s this: Clinton discussed executed Iranian scientist on email.

Hillary Clinton recklessly discussed, in emails hosted on her private server, an Iranian nuclear scientist who was executed by Iran for treason, Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., said Sunday.

How many other policy disasters have followed from every foreign government having immediate access to everything Hillary illegally wrote as Secretary of State on her private email accounts. Ah well. What you don’t know can’t hurt you, I suppose. Or at least not right away.

Any lie will do

This is picked up from John Hinderaker at Powerline: ON IRAN, ISRAELIS SAY: OBAMA IS WRONG. This has large implications and will add to the tensions between the US and Israel, but sometimes clarity is more important:

Israel is rejecting remarks by President Barack Obama contending it no longer opposes the nuclear deal that world powers struck with Iran in 2015.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Friday that “Israel’s view on the Iran deal remains unchanged.”

Israel’s Defense Ministry reportedly compared the deal to the 1938 Munich Pact ahead of World War II, which Britain and France signed with Germany and which averted war at the time but effectively gave then-Czechoslovakia to the Nazis.

The final point made in the post is the right one: “We have entered a bizarro world in which facts seemingly make no difference. Any lie will do, as far as the Obama administration and Hillary Clinton are concerned.” How Israel, or the rest of us for that matter, are going to survive this period of history is now anyone’s guess.

100 days to go

How dangerous would Hillary be as president. This dangerous:

“In my first 100 days, we will work with both parties to pass the biggest investment in new, good paying jobs since World War II. Jobs in manufacturing, clean energy, technology and innovation, small business, and infrastructure.”

If this kind of cross between Keynes and Alinsky doesn’t worry you, you don’t know when to be worried. And that is the least of my concerns about what a third Clinton presidency will include.

For another take, you can try Roger Simon on America’s First Major Socialist Party Debuts in Philadelphia. Guess which party that is.

Meanwhile, Trump may have his nose ahead in the polls but he will have to win by a lot to overcome the vote early, vote often approach taken by the residents of local cemeteries.

Hillary’s America – it’s closer than you think

At Rotten Tomatoes Hillary’s America is 5% among the critics and 82% among the audience. Here is a link to the only positive review listed. It begins:

Hillary’s America: The Secret History of the Democratic Party is a searing, powerful and persuasive exposé on the Democratic Party and Hillary Clinton. Just like in America: Imagine the World Without Her, director Dinesh D’Souza re-examines American history and highlights the facts that should make you horrified and alarmed if you’re a critically-thinking individual. Yes, you might find yourself in denial at first, but denial is a crucial and natural step in the process of coming to terms with a harsh truth. D’Souza includes some re-enactments and archival footage which help to enliven the film so that it’s not just a bunch of talking heads. The fact that D’Souza remains calm and collected, unlike Michael Moore, throughout the film, is a testament to his strengths as a documentarian and investigator. Did you know that it was actually the Democratic Party was racist the Civil War? Or that the “hood” or “ghettos” are essentially the modern versions of plantations? In other words, the Democratic Party is still just as racist now as it was back in the Civil War, but Democrats, will, of course, deny their racism. Did you know that the KKK originated from the Democratic Party and its members were Democrats themselves? Or how about that Planned Parenthood is mostly found in areas where minorities can be found is a form of eugenics started by Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood? Hillary Clinton just so happens to consider Margaret Sanger to be a role model. D’Souza explains something that you ought to know about Hillary: her mentor was writer Saul Alinksy who began scamming people early on in his college days by ripping off his school’s cafeteria while convincing others to take part in the scams as well. That scam serves as a microcosm of what Hillary Clinton plans to do in our country.

And on it goes. The 95% who hate this film are Democrat Operatives with Bylines, and these are merely film critics. The political commentators are worse. Whether we end up seeing it in Australia, it is worth noting that Box Office: Dinesh D’Souza’s ‘Hillary’s America’ Becomes Top Grossing Doc of 2016. Fighting the left is a continuous ongoing uphill battle.

“I watched her partner with President Obama to restore our country’s reputation around the world”

This is from Hot Air’s Live Blog of the second day of the Democrat National Convention.

9:58pm Ex-Secretary of State Madeleine Albright for Bill Clinton: “We need a leader with the experience and judgment to keep America safe…When Hillary served as Secretary of State I watched her partner with President Obama to restore our country’s reputation around the world. She fought terrorism. She stopped the spread of nuclear weapons…Smart power in every corner of the world…

“She knows that safeguarding freedom and security is not like hosting a TV reality show. It is a complex, round-the-clock job that demands not only a steady hand and a cool hand but also a big heart.”

Every word is untrue. Everyone knows it’s untrue, as well. Yet we have a former Clinton Secretary of State saying what she pleases with no fear of contradiction anywhere, except out here where it doesn’t matter. I won’t even bother with ‘You should elect her because the greatest country on Earth has always been about tomorrow’: Bill Clinton gets romantic about ‘best friend’ Hillary and blasts Trump in lengthy, unedited speech. It’s as if the past has no existence and from which nothing can be learned.