John Howard is yesterday’s man and should keep his thoughts to himself

I came across this yesterday morning in The OZ: “Donald Trump is not fit for office: John Howard”.

John Howard has described ­Donald Trump’s behaviour as “appalling” and “atrocious” for not accepting the outcome of the 2020 US presidential election and seeking to overturn the result, and declared him utterly “unfit” to return to the White House.

It continues from there in the same vein. For a third-rate politician who was blessed with having Peter Costello as Treasurer and for which I cannot recall any serious accomplishment, except to lose his own seat in trying to “fix” industrial relations, he really doesn’t know when to shut up.

Trump so outclassed everyone and especially Hillary and Biden, that if Howard were capable of learning he would keep his mouth shut. He’s a typical Democrat with not a policy thought worth considering.

Trump answers his sworn enemies

Why he has taken the fifth:

I once asked, “if you’re innocent, why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?” Now I know the answer to that question. When your family, your company, and all the people in your orbit have become the targets of an unfounded, politically motivated Witch Hunt supported by lawyers, prosecutors, and the Fake News Media, you have no choice. If there was a question in my mind, the raid of my home, Mar-a-Lago on Monday by the FBI, just two days prior to this deposition wiped out any uncertainty. I have absolutely no choice because the current Administration and many prosecutors in the Country have lost all moral and ethical bounds of decency.

Accordingly and under the advice of my counsel and for all of the above reasons, I declined to answer the questions under the rights and privileges afforded to every citizen under the United States Constitution.

The US is officially a banana republic

From Ace of Spades

And not one Democrat has said a word that I know of (it’s always possible but barely).

Chinese pantomime

“Speaker Nancy Pelosi visits Taiwan, flouting Chinese threats and Biden’s concerns” from:

https://news.yahoo.com/speaker-nancy-pelosi-visits-taiwan-145134003.html?fr=sycsrp_catchall

So what. The Chinese coms are part of the play to make Biden appear strong. Just a ruse to help out a mate.

We shall see but I suspect nothing will come of it.

From Drudge [from the far left, that is].

ONE GIANT STEP FOR FREEDOM
PELOSI IN TAIWAN!
CHINA RAGE
WORLD BRACES FOR RESPONSE

We’re such suckers! More theatrics to follow.

Free markets are about to end and so is our prosperity

No one any longer knows now a market economy works. How a necessary feature is a private sector setting prices process. Without that the market will not function. It cannot be run by governments.

Why that is can be found almost in my book alone:

Also from Mises and Hayek but you have to read them closely.

We are about to bring the market economy to an end and no one will be able to bring it back.

The BBC thinks Australia is becoming “unlivable”!

Saw this on Instapundit:

WELL, NO. IT MIGHT BE COMING. I MEAN, THEY WANT TO GO CARBON-FREE:  Australia Becoming Unlivable–BBC.

Personally, seeing this mentioned by the Poms on an American website does make me laugh. I can only say I consider it my greatest good fortune that I ended up in Australia, not in Canada where I was born, nor in the UK where I spent two-plus lovely years in the 1970s, nor in the US which I lived next to growing up and visited many times. 

It may not last the way things are going, but if one surveys the entire planet at the present moment, there is nowhere else better. This is a secret we should, of course, keep to ourselves since it is better to discourage others from overrunning the place.

Hopefully this is also a sign of things to come: Labor return Sri Lankan asylum seeker boat as Operation Sovereign Borders enforced.

As for climate change which is supposedly what will make Australia uninhabitable, this was a comment at Instapundit:

In 2015 – Australia absorbed between 37 and 45 million kilotons of CO2, according to peer reviewed science
https://acp.copernicus.org/…
.
In the same year – Australians emitted an estimated 376 000 kilotons of CO2 total.
.
(2015 was an El-Nino year (typically a year of low vegetative growth in OZ) with the only aspect at all unusual was 17% above average rainfall across the Top End – despite the impact of a positive Indian Ocean Dipole)
.
If the Australia’s goal was to become ‘carbon neutral’ – this peer reviewed scientific study confirms that Australia has ALWAYS been carbon neutral.
.
Job done, next…

Not that I think any of it actually matters, but for the crazies who take climate change seriously, we are certainly doing our bit.

PLUS: There is then this which I just picked up at The Spectator Online [for subscribers only].

According to Professor Ian Plimer, Australia doesn’t need to worry about the ‘Net Zero’ goals that caused the guilt-ridden, city-dwelling rich list to vote Green (well, Teal but same-same). Net Zero by 2030? 2050? No worries, ‘Australia sequesters some five times as much carbon dioxide as it emits. Australia’s net contribution to global atmospheric carbon dioxide is negative. We are already at Net Zero. This is validated by the net carbon dioxide flux estimates from the IBUKI.’