The Abbott Government had better wake up

Andrew Bolt has added one more post after his Christmas farewell and just in case you might miss it, let me link to it. Titled, The two Tims: why the Abbott Government cannot compromise with those now savaging Tim Wilson, here is what I think is the core message:

The Abbott Government had better wake up. There is zero chance of it ever placating its intellectual enemies with any compromise to its agenda. It is in a cultural war, so it may as well be hated by its foes for following its principles than despised by its friends for offering compromises to those who will accept none.

For anyone with a sense of compromise and good will towards all, the left is hard to fathom. But for the left, politics is religion, not a pathway towards finding the best way to manage our collective affairs. There are hatreds there that no compromise will satisfy. It’s not like the cricket where you go off to the pub together after the match. This is tribal and unforgiving. I’m with Andrew Bolt on this. They represent little more than a hatred of success and achievement. If you want to understand Labor, just think of Craig Thomson and his HSU credit card and Julia with her slush fund. For many on the left, genuine concern for others seems to be the farthest thing from their minds.

A study in conservatism

abbott harper key

These are the Prime Ministers of Australia, Canada and New Zealand having a quiet lunch together when they met up at the funeral of Nelson Mandela. I don’t know whether what I like most about it is the quiet reflective down-to-earth mood or that they are three conservative leaders at a time when conservatism is very unfashionable amongst our political elites. I fear that quiet scenes such as this amongst sensible leaders such as these will become more of a rarity. This is from Mark Steyn at National Review. I wonder if this picture has been reproduced anywhere else in Australia.

[Thanks to BW for sending it along.]

Wouldn’t their readers prefer to know what’s really happening?

Do the people who write such stories not know any better or do they have such contempt for their readers that they serve them up what is known to be untrue because it makes them feel better? There is no doubt that the left wants Abbott to fail but still, you have to ground yourself, you would think, in some kind of reality when assessing how things are going. This is from a story in The Sunday Age titled, Stop the boats policy all talk, no action. You can get the gist of where this is going from the opening paras:

The Coalition’s pre-election promise was unequivocal: in the first 100 days of office, it would take ‘immediate action’ to reclaim control of Australia’s borders.

Its Real Solutions policy blueprint vowed: ‘We will immediately give new orders to the Navy to tackle illegal boat arrivals and turn back the boats where safe to do so.’

But in no other policy sphere has the government’s soaring rhetoric crashed more forcefully into reality than in its boats policy – and its damaged relationship with Indonesia has played a key role in the crash.

If anything has been a success, I would have thought, the boats’ policy has been it. Oddly, the bits in bold are not in the online version but only in print. Perhaps the passage has been removed because of this, Yudhoyono wants an even stronger bond, which was picked up at Andrew Bolt.

Canberra as viewed in 1945

This was picked up from a Canadian blog site which described the video as “a 1945 production from Australia’s National Film Board which briefly explains the history of the formation of six states of the Commonwealth of Australia en route to showcasing the planned city of Canberra.”

It’s a different world, and I don’t just mean it’s before the lake.

[Via SmallDeadAnimals]

Labor’s baseline economic legacy

nat acc 1309

nat acc 1309 contributions to growth

On the left are the figures for GDP. On the right are the figures for contributions to growth. Conveniently the GDP data go back to September 2007 so there are a couple of things that are worth pointing out.

First we should note the recession we never had which is quite prominent. You will see a major drop in GDP that somehow escaped being recorded as two consecutive quarters of falling output. Same time as the unemployment rate went from the 3.9% recorded at the time to 5.8%. Didn’t have a recession? It was the recession we didn’t have to have, had it anyway but called it something else.

Then a mint of government spending later we have a massive debt as well as low growth and rising unemployment. GDP growth for the quarter was 0.6% and for the year less than two and a half. And if you’d like to see the evidence of public spending, look at the figures for GFCF-Priv and GFCF-Pub, that is private investment and public investment. Private is falling. Public is rising with a full year reduction in investment in both sectors together of negative 2.0%.

More evidence to ignore that shows public spending does not get you growth, employment or higher living standards.

These are very revealing figures. I only hope our new government understands that growth and prosperity can and will only come from the private sector acting on its own initiative.

The ABC’s operations could be “modernised”

Malcolm Turnbull speaking today about the ABC:

COMMUNICATIONS Minister Malcolm Turnbull has accused the ABC of ‘last century work practices’ and warned the public broadcaster that he had experience in restructuring television networks.

He told the Coalition party room today that the ABC had committed a ‘shocking error of judgment’ in partnering with The Guardian on the publication of a document leaked by US fugitive Edward Snowden.

In response to a scathing critique of the broadcaster by South Australian Senator Cory Bernardi, Mr Turnbull defended ABC managing director Mark Scott and said the broadcaster was not ‘cannibalising’ private media companies.

However, he suggested the ABC’s operations could be modernised, saying ‘old-fashioned’ and ‘last century work practices’ were a problem for the broadcaster.

‘I’ve actually restructured a television network,’ Mr Turnbull told colleagues, referring to his work as a broadcast lawyer in the 1990s sale of Network Ten.

Mr Turnbull also questioned whether the broadcaster was adhering to its obligations under law.

‘The real question is, is the ABC adhering to its statutory charter and in particular its obligation to give fair treatment to both sides of politics,’ Mr Turnbull said, according to those at the meeting.

Do us a favour – keep it to yourself

No one wants this government to succeed more than I do. So when I write about something I see as a wrong step taken, I do it in the hope that the Government will see what I write – assuming that they take any notice at all – as advice from a friend. I am a citizen blogger and we are a site that almost overwhelmingly has high hopes that this government will stay around for a long time to come. But this blog is like closed-circuit TV. We are a small close knit group who speaks to each other.

A story like this on the other hand – with the following headline across the front page of the AFRReith accuses Abbott of orchestrating GrainCorp veto – is different. And when we go into the text, this is what we find:

One of the most senior figures of the Howard government and a leading ­figure of the Liberal Party’s conservative wing, Peter Reith, has accused Prime Minister Tony Abbott of orchestrating the veto of a $3.4 billion US bid for GrainCorp, which he described as the latest of several botched decisions.

Mr Reith called on the new government to show more leadership and resist the push for government subsidies and assistance for business, and raised concerns that the GrainCorp decision, which was supposed to have been made by Treasurer Joe Hockey, makes a bailout of Qantas Airways more likely.

Here’s the difference between myself and Peter Reith. He can pick up the phone and talk to the Prime Minister, not all the time perhaps but at least some of the time. He has the ear of most of the front bench and he can tell them privately what his concerns are.

Here is another difference. It would not be a news story if I thought that the government had “botched” something. It would not potentially swing a single vote or help alienate any part of the voting public. A former government Minister in John Howard’s government, however, is in an entirely different place. He does cause people to become disaffected. He loosens the hold of the Coalition on government.

He and others like him should stay out of it. They had their moment and that moment is gone. Their public criticisms only do harm. Malcolm Fraser became Labor’s greatest shill but we had stopped paying attention to him years ago.

Coalition unity is more important than GrainCorp. I have never understood the full complexity of the issue but the Nationals are dead against the sale. From what I understand, they are wrong to be opposed but that’s how it is. What’s the advice therefore being offered? Ram it through? Create a split in the government? Demonstrate to National Party voters there’s no point in voting National?

If I thought it was a bad decision I could say it but so what. For people a phone call away from making these point personally, however, people whose name recognition is high and who are associated with this government by being former high profile politicians on the Coalition side, their responsibility is to avoid at all costs the damage they have most clearly done. Their responsibility should be to ensure this government has a long life. In the meantime, they should keep such criticism for private communication to their friends in the government. And barring that, they should keep it to themselves.

They will wreck it if they can

How many different ways does the Labor/Green Alliance work to undermine this country. There cannot be two principles to rub together in refusing temporary protection visas. What is the fundamental reason for this, other than a desire to see more boats arrive? This, however, is what they say:

Australian Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young told the chamber the government’s cruelty should not harm the hearts of people who have suffered so much already.

‘No longer will these refugees have to live in limbo,’ she said.

‘These visas never worked as a deterrent, they only punished the most vulnerable.’ . . .

Labor frontbencher Kim Carr told the chamber Labor supported the motion because the visas could result in further tragedies.

‘TPVs act as a magnate for women and children… such is the desperation of people seeking to be reunited with their loved ones,’ Senator Carr said, explaining that the visas remove scope for family reunions.

But on the other hand, this is from the Government:

The outcome was slammed by Immigration Minister Scott Morrison who vows to press on with the coalition’s commitments to fight people smuggling.

‘The vote to abolish TPVs (temporary protection visas) is a vote to deliver on the promise of people smugglers to more than 33,000 people who turned up illegally on boats,’ Mr Morrison said in a statement issued late on Monday.

He added that the backlog of asylum seekers waiting to be issued with visas under Labor’s system will not be settled by the coalition.

‘We will be keeping our promise to deny permanent residence to those who arrived illegally by boat, whether they turned up three months ago or three years ago.’

The worst government in our history has now become the worse opposition in our history.

Sharing my anger and filling in the blanks

It’s all very well to have a turn the other cheek attitude when you are wronged personally but in politics this is an approach that has its limits.

I have just watched Tony Abbott on The Bolt Report and am afraid that I am dissatisfied with his response. Everything can be explained, and everything can be forgiven, but that is not what the other side is doing nor can ever be expected to do.

We over here want this government to succeed. But if the government does not share my anger with the things that make me angry or refuses to fill in the blanks about the details of policy so that we can see what is actually taking place, then they may feel very good about themselves internally but none of us out here will either feel very warm about what’s being done or have much in the way of arguments to defend what is going on.

Take Gonski, which is a policy I do not support so do not actually care one way or another about its fulfilment. But a promise was made during the election, Christopher Pyne has implied that the government was going to walk away from the full commitment, but the PM said today that what was promised will be delivered while also suggesting that what was promised may be different from what we think was promised. Very subtle, no doubt, but will not work as a political answer. The detail of why the Gonski commitment will be fulfilled as promised, and not in some casuistical way, has to be explained.

Even more so do I feel the anger with the ABC. It is not part of the free press. It has the stamp of government all over it and is 100% paid for by the government, that is, by us. What is said on Sky or in The Age people like myself might disagree with but no one argues they have no right to say what they say. With the ABC, it’s different. The ABC is supposed to be a reflection of Australia, and even if we know better here, they don’t know better in Indonesia.

This failure to take sides in political issues, to articulate and reflect the views of those who support this government, and therefore support good government, will end up with that support eroding. Perhaps we are looking at a new approach to politics that is more subtle than any we have seen before and that in the fullness of time will learn to appreciate its success. But in the meantime, people such as myself remain nervous and I must say a bit let down by the entire experience so far.

UPDATE: The transcript of the interview with Tony Abbott. It reads a lot better in print than it sounded when broadcast live.

Partisans without a policy

I didn’t like the Rudd/Gillard/Rudd Government because it did things that I thought were perniciously wrong. And I was pleased to read the Murdoch press because on many of these issues we saw eye to eye.

But it is maddening to read the left wing press today. Do they actually want the things that Labor did? Do they want an open borders policy? Are they happy to see boat people drown to prove some obscure point? Do they want us to spend our way into perennial debt? Are they happy to see money thrown away on one wasteful project after another? Do they want Australia’s relationships with Indonesia and China poisoned in perpetuity?

These people make no sense to me. They are partisans without a policy. They are journalists without judgment. Where do their opinions come from? How do they get to write for newspapers or pontificate at the ABC? Do they think there is a perfect world in the offing if only this, that or the other?

Shallow, ignorant and dangerous. Their aim is to prove that a free press has limits. But a free press also must be disciplined by the market. Let The Age and The SMH do their worst. If there is a market for the junk they write, well on you go. But the ABC, it belongs to all of us and if we no longer want what they offer what is to be done? I can only hope that someone has a plan because it is an organisation out of control.