It’s a weird world when the ideal male is the one displayed in the Obamacare ads. The head of the dynasty was already a TV personality back in Louisiana doing a hunting and fishing show when he and his family were tapped to star in the Duck Dynasty series. The Obamacare chap was a left wing political activist.

Compare and contrast. And for what it’s worth, the following is a straight up ad for Obamacare which is discussed here.

UPDATE: This is from Mark Steyn in a brief but clearly angry post that should be read in full. His title is Re-Education Camp and directs his aim at the editor of National Review:

I am sorry my editor at NR does not grasp the stakes. Indeed, he seems inclined to ‘normalize’ what GLAAD is doing. But, if he truly finds my ‘derogatory language’ offensive, I’d rather he just indefinitely suspend me than twist himself into a soggy pretzel of ambivalent inertia trying to avoid the central point — that a society where lives are ruined over an aside because some identity-group don decides it must be so is ugly and profoundly illiberal. As to his kind but belated and conditional pledge to join me on the barricades, I had enough of that level of passionate support up in Canada to know that, when the call to arms comes, there will always be some ‘derogatory’ or ‘puerile’ expression that it will be more important to tut over. So thanks for the offer, but I don’t think you’d be much use, would you?

People in positions of power do not like to be criticised. The only people who want the absolute right to criticise governments are the people who are subject to the laws, rules and regulations that are put in place by governments since as often as not – possibly more often – those on the receiving end of these laws, rules and regulations do not like either what is being proposed or has been done.

The following story is therefore of no little interest. It is reprinted in its entirety from The China Daily Chinese journalists face Marxist ideology exam so the news hasn’t exactly been suppressed. And in case you don’t get the message, this is the subhead for the story, “Exam to be based on 700-page manual that prohibits published reports from featuring comments that go against party line”. The story in its entirety follows below:

Chinese journalists will have to pass a new ideology exam early next year to keep their press cards, in what reporters say is another example of the ruling Communist party’s increasing control over the media under President Xi Jinping.

It is the first time reporters have been required to take such a test en masse, state media have said. The exam will be based on a 700-page manual peppered with directives such as ‘it is absolutely not permitted for published reports to feature any comments that go against the party line’, and ‘the relationship between the party and the news media is one of leader and the led’.

Some reporters say the impact of the increased control in the past year has been chilling. ‘The tightening is very obvious in newspapers that have an impact on public opinion,’ a journalist at a current affairs magazine said. ‘These days there are lots of things they aren’t allowed to report.’

China has also intensified efforts to curb the work of foreign news organisations. The New York Times Company and Bloomberg News have not been given new journalist visas for more than a year after they published stories about the wealth of relatives of the former premier Wen Jiabao and Xi.

On Thursday, China’s foreign ministry granted Bloomberg journalists and some New York Times reporters press accreditation, allowing them to proceed with visa applications.

‘We hope this development means the New York Times reporters still awaiting their press cards will be given them soon, and all the reporters whose visa procedure is still under way will be issued with 2014 residence visas,’ said Peter Ford, president of the Foreign Correspondents’ Club of China, said in a statement.

The General Administration of Press and Publication, a key media regulator, has said via state media that the aim of the exam and accompanying training is to ‘increase the overall quality of China’s journalists and encourage them to establish socialism as their core system of values’. It did not respond to questions from Reuters about the exam or press freedom in China.

Traditionally, Chinese state media have been the key vehicle for party propaganda. But reforms over the past decade that have allowed greater media commercialisation and limited increases in editorial independence, combined with the rise of social media, have weakened government control, according to academics.

Even within the party, interpretations of the media’s ideal role in Chinese society vary. ‘Supervision by the press is conducive not only to the struggle against corruption, but also to social progress,’ said Yu Keping, deputy president of the Central Compilation and Translation Bureau(CCTB), on Thursday at the Caixin Summit, a high-profile gathering of politics and economics experts organised by an influential Chinese magazine. The bureau is responsible for ‘translating and researching classical Marxist works’, according to the official webpage china.org.cn.

‘There are preconditions for the press to make contributions to social progress,’ he added. ‘One is independence – the press should not be attached to powerful organisations.’

Yet China media watchers point to a flurry of editorials after Xi spoke to propaganda officials in August as evidence of concern within the party that control over public discourse was slipping. The official Beijing Daily described the party’s struggle to win hearts and minds as a ‘fight to the death’.

Some reporters and academics, however, trace the start of the tougher attitude to a strike lasting several days in January by journalists at an outspoken newspaper, the Southern Weekly, after censors scrapped a new year editorial calling for China to enshrine constitutional rights. Xi had taken over the Communist party only several weeks earlier.

‘This was a shock to Xi Jinping’s leadership [circle],’ said Xiao Qiang, a China media expert at the University of California at Berkeley. ‘They own these newspapers. That makes it an internal, public rebellion, which made the censorship and media control mechanism look really bad.’

The strike ended after local propaganda officials promised to take a lighter hand with censorship. Some senior reporters have since left the paper, according to two sources. The Southern Weekly declined to comment.

Journalists will have to undertake a minimum 18 hours of training on topics including Marxist news values and socialism with Chinese characteristics, as well as journalism ethics, before sitting the exam in January or February. Reporters who fail the test will have to resit the exam and undergo the training again. It is not clear what happens to reporters who refuse to take it.

In theory, all reporters in China need a press card to report, although Zhan Jiang, a journalism professor at the Beijing Foreign Studies University, said many did without one. Zhan said recent scandals in the Chinese media had raised some questions about the industry’s professionalism.

A reporter for the New Express tabloid in Guangzhou was arrested in October after confessing on state television to accepting bribes for fabricating more than a dozen stories about Zoomlion Heavy Industry Science and Technology Co Ltd in Changsha. The reporter wrote that Zoomlion had engaged in sales fraud and exaggerated its profits, accusations strongly denied by the state-owned construction equipment maker.

‘It’s hard to say if this is really to improve the actions of journalists or to control them. You don’t know what [the authorities] are thinking,’ Zhan said.

Reporters had little doubt about the aim of the exam. ‘The purpose of this kind of control is just to wear you down, to make you feel like political control is inescapable,’ said a reporter for a newspaper in the booming southern city of Guangzhou.