Lara Logan – she of Tahir Square – on al Qaeda and the Taliban

This is a video of a speech given by Lara Logan, the CBS reporter assaulted in Tahir Square in Cairo. What she is explaining is that far from the Taliban and Al Qaeda being on the run, they are coming back more powerfully than ever and they are posing an ever greater threat to the West. And she would know, and because she is an absolute insider in media networks, she will have more than a normal level of influence on the coming debates on American foreign policy and not incidentally on media reporting of the Obama administration. I don’t know whether she would have spoken as she does before her horrific personal experience but however she felt then, she is certainly clear eyed today.

There is a quite full report in The Chicago Sun Times with this extended quote from the speech:

Her ominous and frightening message was gleaned from years of covering our wars in the Middle East. She arrived in Chicago on the heels of her Sept. 30 report, ‘The Longest War.’ It examined the Afghanistan conflict and exposed the perils that still confront America, 11 years after 9/11.

Eleven years later, ‘they’ still hate us, now more than ever, Logan told the crowd. The Taliban and al-Qaida have not been vanquished, she added. They’re coming back.

‘I chose this subject because, one, I can’t stand, that there is a major lie being propagated . . .’ Logan declared in her native South African accent.

The lie is that America’s military might has tamed the Taliban.

‘There is this narrative coming out of Washington for the last two years,’ Logan said. It is driven in part by ‘Taliban apologists,’ who claim ‘they are just the poor moderate, gentler, kinder Taliban,’ she added sarcastically. ‘It’s such nonsense!’

Logan stepped way out of the ‘objective,’ journalistic role. The audience was riveted as she told of plowing through reams of documents, and interviewing John Allen, the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan; Afghan President Hamid Karzai, and a Taliban commander trained by al-Qaida. The Taliban and al-Qaida are teaming up and recruiting new terrorists to do us deadly harm, she reports.

She made a passionate case that our government is downplaying the strength of our enemies in Afghanistan and Pakistan, as a rationale of getting us out of the longest war. We have been lulled into believing that the perils are in the past: ‘You’re not listening to what the people who are fighting you say about this fight. In your arrogance, you think you write the script.’

Our enemies are writing the story, she suggests, and there’s no happy ending for us.

What a consequential election the Americans are about to have with the right to free contraceptives and saving Big Bird from the private sector the major elements in the Democrat pitch.

VP debate Friday @ noon ADST on SBS

Biden is wily and been around the traps for quite a while. He is practised in the art of politics which makes him a formidable opponent and not someone to let one’s guard down against for a moment. Though he lied and misrepresented from one end of the debate to the other, in my remembrance of the time he was more than a match for Sarah Palin and Paul Ryan is new at the game. Ryan has a number of potential problems in front of him – he may be too wonkish, he may sound too much like he intends to slash and burn and he is coming in against an expectation that will work against him if at the end of the night Biden has been able to hold his own. For all that, Ryan understands the issues within an inch of his life and Biden does not. We shall soon see for ourselves.

Friday on SBS at ADST noon.

Getting off the campaign bus

Maybe, just maybe, the media don’t like to be taken for complete fools. They are partisan to the farthest extent possible, but there comes a time when their integrity becomes so obviously on the line that there is nothing left for them to do but to try to look responsible and honest. The persistent lies by Obama over the attack on the Consulate in Benghazi and the death of the American ambassador are now rightly an issue that only the deeply morally impaired will be able to support the president on. Following the debate, this may be the final death blow for media complicity in a failing election campaign. The media may be – may be – about to get off the Obama campaign bus.

Dealing with the ideologically deaf

It is only now, in watching the Prime Minister in her latest episode with Peter Slipper, that it has occurred to me that when she goes into political battle she carries with her a magic gender shield so that no matter what anyone says about her policies or incompetence, all she hears is that you’re useless because you’re a woman. No one actually ever thinks it or certainly ever says it, but that is what she always transmutes every form of criticism into so that nothing is personal, everything is ideological, and the ideology is some antique disdain for women that was already out of date in the 1960s.

For someone such as myself, who felt as strongly and positively about Margaret Thatcher as I did about Ronald Reagan, the notion that behind my disgust at the policies of such as astonishingly incompetent Prime Minister as Gillard has proven to be are attitudes based on her sex is both insulting and ridiculous. But for her such beliefs are a talisman that protects her from every criticism since she never has to take them seriously because to her they are based on biological facts on not on her personal incompetence.

There must be no end of such people in politics. It now strikes me that Obama is of a similar kind, transmuting every political criticism into a statement on race. The colour of his skin provides a psychological shield against taking criticism to heart since such criticisms are, in his own mind, racially based and not based on political disagreement.

The question then is what is one to do to convince such people that what is being said about them is unrelated to various existentially biological facts but to their political decisions. And it may turn out that there is nothing that can be done. But if so, it is a warning to us that to elect people such as Gillard or Obama to high office carries the risk that they are incapable of responding to normal political debate since they are incapable of interpreting criticism as based on policy difference unrelated to biology. They will therefore never respond to the criticisms they receive in the way a person – male or female, black or white – would if they were in a similar position without such beliefs about others. This will, moreover, only affect politicians on the left side of the ideological divide since the right has by and large discarded categorisation by race or gender. They are, in fact, so far outside the normal thought processes of the right that it has become almost impossible to engage in debate with such people since we are never quite capable of understanding why they are so resistant to the criticisms we make.

The inflexibility of both Gillard and Obama – over the NBN or boat people here in Australia and in America over such matters as health care and the budget – means they plough on relentlessly in the face of innumerable facts and arguments that demonstrate how wrong such policies are. They don’t listen, they are incapable of listening, because they disregard all criticisms as based on dislike of women in the one case or of black people in the other.

Romney and foreign policy

There was little doubt about the kind of foreign policy a Mitt Romney administration was going to run from the moment he met with Benjamin Netanyahu in Jerusalem and Lech Walesa in Warsaw. It is even likely that the bust of Sir Winston Churchill might be returned to the Oval Office. Romney, however, gave an address last night which is presented as channeled through Rush Limbaugh whose take I could not improve on. First Limbaugh:

Another tremendous speech by Mitt Romney just now. Let me tell you something. This man is truly showing his presidential timbre.

And now Romney, this from his speech:

When we look at the Middle East today, with Iran closer than ever to nuclear weapons capability, with the conflict in Syria threatening to destabilize the region, and with violent extremists on the march — and with an American ambassador and three others dead likely at the hands of Al-Qaeda affiliates — it’s clear that the risk of conflict in the region is higher now than when the president took office. I know the president hopes for a safer, freer, and more prosperous Middle East allied with us. I share this hope.

But hope is not a strategy.

What a line! Hope (and change) is not a strategy. The difference between Romney and Obama could not be more clear and the distance could not be greater. If they elect Obama after this, the US will have raised the white flag and we here, way off in the South Pacific, are for all practical purposes to be left on our own.

The full speech can be found here. Articulate and as clear eyed as you could wish in the increasingly dangerous world in which we live.

Uh oh . . . oh, oh, Paul Ryan!

Meanwhile, on the other side of the divide, the current Vice President is taking six days away from the campaign so that he will be able to meet Ryan – perish the thought on equal terms – but so far as the Democrats are concerned, merely not to embarrass their side once again. Of course, having him away from the campaign is the only way to keep him from embarrassing them once again. But next Friday morning the VP debate will be on for us all to see just how excellent the Democrat team really is.

Lies, damned lies and Keynesian economics

They love spending the money but with the disastrous results now being recorded everywhere, it is turning out that this deficit finance has not been such a great thing after all. We are looking in the eye of the great Keynesian fail and the world will turn to deal with those C+I+G-based theories as soon as we have dispensed with the politicians who have ruined the economies they have managed based on this Keynesian nonsense.

My Free Market Economics was written in 2009 well before these disasters. It was, in fact, written precisely because these were the disasters I fully expected. I am told occasionally that there is some other way to make sense of why this increase in public spending has led to a worsening in employment growth to accompany the debt other than through a return to pre-Keynesian classical theory and Say’s Law but if there is I haven’t come across it. Austerity is the new black which merely says governments must live within their means.

The above chart is doing the rounds – picked up on Instapundit in this instance – and shows that the deficit blow out most assuredly began with Obama who now prefers not to take the credit. The story in Australia would be even worse since the budgets all leading up to Labor taking over in 2007 were in surplus to go with our ZERO debt.

Swan and Gillard promise a surplus they will never deliver but wish they could. They now talk about the need for budget balance in the same way as any of the pre-Keynesians. And the fact is there will be no return to economic health until the public sector is reduced and the private sector is given the space to grow and expand.

Satire at its finest, some even intended

The American election is turning into one of the great comedy moments in history. First there’s this, which is actual intended satire. It is Obama’s debating notes that he kept while at the podium:

But then there’s this, which is from a hilarious article in The Washington Post whose point is, after three pages of boredom, that if Romney is any good at managing, why doesn’t he have more money:

And if he is not a billionaire, doesn’t it suggest that he was not a great private-equity investor after all, thus torpedoing his claim to understand how to create jobs and get the economy back on track?

Something to keep in mind on Nov. 6.

Their idiocy knows no bounds.

Romney also had a set of notes: In the interest of equity and fairness, I should also attach Mitt Romney’s speaker’s notes.

Millions who tuned in have now tuned Obama out

The cartoon is priceless and dedicated to all ye Republicans of little faith. The text is from Hugh Hewitt who puts the current state of play just as I see it myself:

It is a recession, folks, and it is headed this way, accelerated by President Obama’s election year campaigning for growth-killing tax hikes and the promise of energy-production-destroying anti-fracking rules and other EPA job killing moves in December. (The recession has already arrived in the Eurozone.)

The economic reality most people feel is the price at the pumps –double what it was when President Obama took office– and the knowledge that they have of the joblessness of friends and family and the job insecurity they and others worry over. The cluelessness displayed by President Obama on Wednesday night has become the symbol of his entire presidency, and his aimlessness in answering direct questions is what most distressed independent voters who moved so decidedly towards Romney in the Frank Luntz focus group that shocked long-time watchers of such groups.

The huge polling margins that declared Romney a winner in the debate took away a lasting impression of the president because it is consistent with the suspicion that has grown up around the 100+-rounds-of-golf playing Commander-in-Chief, the one who jetted off to raise money on the day the nation learned of the brutal murders of our ambassador and his aides in Benghazi and who then participated in the cover-up of that slaughter.

The wandering-in-answer Obama Wednesday night was the same guy who doesn’t sit down with the press (and now we know why) and who cannot defend his record though offered repeated opportunities to do so by Jim Lehrer.

The takeaway from the first week in October, as the voting begins across the country, is that President Obama was as unprepared for the debate as he was for the presidency.

He isn’t doing his job because he can’t do his job.

The cluelessness President Obama displayed erases any argument that his on-the-job training has equipped him for a second term or earned him a second chance.

It was the worst debate performance by a sitting president in the history of these meetings, and millions who tuned in have now tuned out his appeals for one more chance. Not this time. Not with conditions this serious.