Just picked up at Tim Blair with the very clever title, Everybody Out. For the first minute you won’t know where this is heading, with many destinations possible. As he wrote “Shortly after it was posted, this trade union ad was removed from YouTube following hilarious leftist outrage.” Just watch it. Anything said before will spoil the fun.
Monthly Archives: June 2015
A common sense program for action
Let me see if I have this straight.
Public spending on wind farms will create jobs, save the planet, restore the economy to strong rates of economic growth and raise our standard of living.
And in spite of the obvious common sense of this program, there are still people who are opposed. I have to say, it’s incredible what some people will believe.
The only secrets the US government keeps are the ones it keeps from its citizens
The only thing more incredible than this story of the Great Hack itself is how little impression it has made on the American population. Indeed on anyone. The quietest big news story I have ever seen. This is from James Taranto at the Washington Post: Hacking Government Apart:
The scandal at the U.S. Office of Personnel Management just keeps getting worse. In his Monday column, Gordon Crovitz summed up what was known at the time about the “unprecedented hacking by China of confidential databases” at OPM:
In one incident, hackers obtained the records of more than four million federal employees, which include listings of “close or continuous contacts.” That tells Beijing which of its citizens are in contact with American officials.
Another hacking incident affected many millions more—apparently nearly everyone who has applied for a security clearance. The hacked data include a 127-page background form with personal details such as mental-health conditions, police records, drug use and bankruptcy. Chinese intelligence could use this information to blackmail federal employees. The form also includes details on “people who know you well,” enabling China to piece together networks of people, including Chinese citizens, linked to federal employees.
There are other dangers as well. The Chinese government may not have exclusive access to the data, which include Social Security numbers; Pierluigi Paganini reports at the website SecurityAffairs.co that he has “personally found” them offered for sale on “a popular black market” that is part of the so-called dark web.
And the breadth of the population affected by the hacking continues to grow. “The OPM data file contains the records of non-military, non-intelligence executive branch employees, which covers most federal civilian employees but not, for example, members of Congress and their staffs.” But the Hill reports today that “members of Congress have started receiving notices that their information was likely stolen”:
The OPM doesn’t manage Capitol Hill staffers’ personnel files, but retirement records are forwarded to the agency when they leave the Hill.
Additionally, any Hill staffer who previously worked for another federal agency has been exposed, according to emails sent Tuesday night to House and Senate workers.
“It now appears likely that the service records of current House employees employed previously by ANY federal government entity (including the House, if an individual left the House and later returned to a House position) may have been compromised,” said an email from House Chief Administrative Officer Ed Cassidy.
Would you like some more? This is from the testimony that is bringing all of this to light explaining the way in which things had developed:
Some of the contractors that have helped OPM with managing internal data have had security issues of their own—including potentially giving foreign governments direct access to data long before the recent reported breaches. A consultant who did some work with a company contracted by OPM to manage personnel records for a number of agencies told Ars that he found the Unix systems administrator for the project “was in Argentina and his co-worker was physically located in the [People’s Republic of China]. Both had direct access to every row of data in every database: they were root. Another team that worked with these databases had at its head two team members with PRC passports. I know that because I challenged them personally and revoked their privileges. From my perspective, OPM compromised this information more than three years ago and my take on the current breach is ‘so what’s new?’”
And as Taranto adds at this point: “In case you’re unfamiliar with the terminology: “Social engineering” in this context refers to tricking people into revealing passwords or otherwise violating security protocols; and “root” means access to an entire system.” This is stunning, absolutely stunning.
When Adam Smith wrote on “the wealth of nations” what did he mean by “wealth”?
This was the initial query sent to the Societies for the History of Economic Thought discussion thread on June 16.
Dear colleagues,
I’m trying to trace the source of translating “economics” as “the science of wealth” (and sometimes “the science of the wealth of nations”) in late nineteenth-century Ottoman-Turkish. Ottoman economists most probably rendered it from French (“la science de la richesse”), from popular sources preceding the 1860s. I could find expressions like “l’économie politique est la science de la richesse” in many economic texts from the era, but I’m trying to understand how common it was to use “la science de la richesse” instead of or interchangeably with “l’économie politique” referring to the discipline itself.
What has followed has been a brief discourse that amounts to the statement from one of the French correspondents that “it is very easy to show that ‘science de la richesse‘ was a synonym of political economy in the first half of 19th century, not from ‘popular sources’ but just to explain the title of books.” I have therefore sent my own brief contribution along, because I do think that words make a very great deal of difference in how we think and what we are able to understand.
It has seemed to me for a while that the title, The Wealth of Nations, is an eighteenth century use of words and is somewhat misleading as to the point that Smith was making. I have tried to find a modern phrase that would capture what he meant, and the closest I have been able to come to is: The Prosperity of Nations. “Wealth” has a kind of treasure chest notion to it (which it may not have had back then), and the word “wealthy” is tied to personal riches, which is not at all, I think, what Smith was trying to get at. So when I read that the French for “wealth” is “richesse“, or that my google translator turns “The Wealth of Nations” into “la richesse des nations“, I really do therefore wonder how much has been lost in translation. Because when I translate the English word “riches” into French, it gives me “richesse” once again. The alternative French to English of “richesse” are “wealth”, “richness”, “riches”, “rich” and “affluent”. And for the French word “riche” we get these English translations: “rich”, “wealthy”, “affluent”, “opulent”, “splendid” and “luxurious”. Each of them seem totally inadequate to making sense of what Smith had in mind or what the book is about. This seems to me more than just a curiosity.
Public sector competence and the sighting of unicorns
Following the hacking story from the US is beyond incredible. I mean really, who would have thought that the IRS story, sickening and disgusting as it is, could be superseded. Hackers (i.e. the Chinese) have the records of every single American public service employee, right down to their applications to work in the foreign service, where they are asked to list any possible issues in their lives that others could use to blackmail them. But who has to hack when they are building the system themselves. Here’s the latest: Encryption “would not have helped” at OPM, says DHS official
But even if the systems had been encrypted, it likely wouldn’t have mattered. Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary for Cybersecurity Dr. Andy Ozment testified that encryption would “not have helped in this case” because the attackers had gained valid user credentials to the systems that they attacked—likely through social engineering. And because of the lack of multifactor authentication on these systems, the attackers would have been able to use those credentials at will to access systems from within and potentially even from outside the network. . . .
Some of the contractors that have helped OPM with managing internal data have had security issues of their own—including potentially giving foreign governments direct access to data long before the recent reported breaches. A consultant who did some work with a company contracted by OPM to manage personnel records for a number of agencies told Ars that he found the Unix systems administrator for the project “was in Argentina and his co-worker was physically located in the [People’s Republic of China]. Both had direct access to every row of data in every database: they were root. Another team that worked with these databases had at its head two team members with PRC passports. I know that because I challenged them personally and revoked their privileges. From my perspective, OPM compromised this information more than three years ago and my take on the current breach is ‘so what’s new?'”
They’re incompetent, you can’t trust them and they are socialists. What’s left to go wrong from here?
Riding the tiger and hoping for the best
This is where the US is now at: Fed holds off on interest rate hike, downgrades economic forecast.
Federal Reserve policymakers on Wednesday kept the central bank’s benchmark short-term interest rate near zero, opting against the first increase since 2006 after determining the economy still isn’t strong enough to handle it.
Fed officials sharply downgraded their economic forecast for this year. They projected the economy would grow between 1.8% and 2% this year, well below the range of 2.3% to 2.7% in its last forecast in March.
If they’re correct, annual growth would be the worst since 2011 and would be far from the breakout performance some economists had hoped for this year.
And this is where the US is eventually to be at. From Drudge:
BANK OF GREECE WARNS OF ‘UNCONTROLLABLE CRISIS’…
Greeks stashing bundles of cash in homes in fear of ‘Grexit’…
PANIC AT THE BANK: CUSTOMER PAYMENTS ‘MISSING’ FROM ACCOUNTS IN UK…
‘Glitch’…
LEW: ‘Foreign shocks’ could harm USA financial stability…
Not to worry. They’ll be able to start raising rates in the US again when there’s a Republican President. Until then, they ride the tiger and hope for the best. But this is what you get when you try to make your economy grow from the demand side.
This is no laughing matter
Way back then, when I was one of those university students, a story like this couldn’t even be printed in any newspaper, anywhere in the world. This would have been full-on pornography. Now this is about a poll published in The Washington Post:
On Monday I detailed how the Washington Post’s survey claiming that one in five women have been sexually assaulted in college is deeply flawed. But there was an aspect of the survey I didn’t get to, one that does not bode well for the future of relationships among students.
Deep in the poll, respondents were asked to decide whether a particular action “establishes consent for more sexual activity.” They were given five examples. The only example that fell clearly in the “yes” category among men and women respondents was “nods in agreement.”
To the example “takes off their own clothes,” men and women were split on whether that established consent. Fifty percent of men said “yes,” while 45 percent said “no.” For women, 52 percent said “no,” while 44 percent said “yes.”
For the example “gets a condom,” men and women agreed that it does not establish consent for further action, although the margin was wider for women than for men.
As for the examples “engages in foreplay such as kissing or touching” and “does not say ‘no,’” the vast majority of men and women said neither action established consent.
This finding (though, to be clear, I question the validity of the whole document) indicates that the future of sex must contain a strict format for establishing consent. Nothing except a question-and-answer session will do, as actions such as foreplay and getting a condom no longer count.
No one actually has sex this way, as I argued in a recent article about attempts by two law professors to criminalize sexual contact that doesn’t follow the Q-and-A format.
I’d like to know the back stories on those responses. Did men say those actions didn’t establish consent because they fear a campus hearing wouldn’t accept them? Or are the behavior police starting to get through?
Do such people get married? What do they do then?
Phyllis Chesler and the right to be heard
Phyllis Chesler married an Afghan and went to live in Afghanistan when she was not much more than a teenager. She wrote a remarkable book about her experience, but also learned a lifetime worth of insight that we ought to be able to learn from in the West but won’t and do not. Bad luck for us. But this latest article of hers, The Truth-Teller’s Gulag, is about the chill that fell on her work and her friendships when she joined those who defend Israel.
I am an intellectual and a writer and I live in the West. I have not been physically beaten, imprisoned, or tortured, nor have my books been burned. However, I have been cast into a peculiar kind of Gulag. After a long and successful career, my work—both past and current—has been “disappeared” by those who once praised it.
It is like with everything that is disapproved by the left. It might as well not exist. Read the whole story of the fate that befell a clear-headed woman of courage who tried to talk sense and honesty to a world that doesn’t want the truth to be heard and will do everything it can to stop it. You don’t go to the gulag; where you go is into Coventry which turns out to be even more effective because you still have your right to free speech. You only no longer have a right to be heard.
The US no longer united
From Drudge today, tucked away in a corner at the bottom right:
BUCHANAN: Is Third World America Inevitable?
10% of Lewiston, Maine now Somali refugees…
Feds free rapists, child molester and kidnappers…
More than 100 murders attributed to illegals released…
NYC Dems seek to boost immigrant voter registration…
60% of New Yorkers DO NOT speak English at home…
Supreme Court says deportation deadlines can be extended…
You can’t miss it, but for some reason, no one dares to point it out.
“Saudi Arabia’s number one priority is peace between Israelis and Arabs”
The more I look at it, the more I am beginning to like this Obama fellow. Everything he tries to do he screws up, such as his attempt to bring on a Muslim Brotherhood government in Egypt or to wreck Israel on behalf of its enemies. So where are we now, incompetent fool that he is: The Saudis Team Up With Israel. It’s an amazing story, and entirely plausible, with this the best part. But in reading the small bit below, you have to know that “Eshki” is retired Saudi general Anwar Majed Eshki who is conducting talks with Israel on behalf of Saudi Arabia. Now proceed.
But take a look at the other points Eshki made.
He says Saudi Arabia’s number one priority is peace between Israelis and Arabs. Read that sentence again and let it sink in. Saudi Arabia’s number one priority is peace between Israelis and Arabs. Not between Israelis and Palestinians, but between Israel and the entire Arab world.
It’s awful, however, the damage that Obama has done to his own country, where they will soon start to build fences, not along the Mexican border but inside their own cities. But for the rest of us, he may end up being the un-Wilson. American isolationism may have its good points as well. But if America is to withdraw from the world, we need to bring back the British Empire while there’s still time.