“There is no scientific evidence that the COVID-19 vaccines improve the health of the individual”

While there is plenty of evidence that these vaxxines do harm. Articles such as this one are suppressed to the fullest extent possible: US COVID-19 Vaccines Proven to Cause More Harm than Good Based on Pivotal Clinical Trial Data Analyzed Using the Proper Scientific Endpoint, “All Cause Severe Morbidity”. Here are the final two paras of what is a quite long but very readable article.

There is an old saying, fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me. This saying can be applied to the COVID-19 mass immunization program. The US anthrax attack of 2001, which originated at US army is Fort Detrick, has demonstrated that there are people in the US government who desire to attack US citizens with bioweapons [10]. According to the chief FBI agent leading the investigation of the US anthrax attack, conspirators were likely not apprehended in part because the investigation was prematurely ended and prior to stopping the investigation, people at the top of the FBI deliberately tried to sabotage the investigation [11]. In the US anthrax attack of 2001, people high in the US government publicly anticipated the anthrax attack as early as 1999 [10].

Similarly with the COVID-19 attack, people high in government anticipated the COVID-19 attack [12,13] several years before the attack took place [10]. There is even data that an effort was made in 2018 to protect certain populations against COVID-19 by immunizing them with MMR vaccine [14]. In such a hostile government environment, the citizens need to individually evaluate the science of immunization with COVID-19 vaccines and not rely on philosophical arguments propagated by government officials. In this case there is no scientific evidence that the COVID-19 vaccines improve the health of the individual, much less of the population as a whole. Mass immunization with COVID-19 vaccines is certainly leading to a catastrophic public health event

While there is plenty of evidence that these vaxxines do harm. Articles such as this one are suppressed to the fullest extent possible: US COVID-19 Vaccines Proven to Cause More Harm than Good Based on Pivotal Clinical Trial Data Analyzed Using the Proper Scientific Endpoint, “All Cause Severe Morbidity”. Here are the final two paras of what is a quite long but very readable article.

There is an old saying, fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me. This saying can be applied to the COVID-19 mass immunization program. The US anthrax attack of 2001, which originated at US army is Fort Detrick, has demonstrated that there are people in the US government who desire to attack US citizens with bioweapons [10]. According to the chief FBI agent leading the investigation of the US anthrax attack, conspirators were likely not apprehended in part because the investigation was prematurely ended and prior to stopping the investigation, people at the top of the FBI deliberately tried to sabotage the investigation [11]. In the US anthrax attack of 2001, people high in the US government publicly anticipated the anthrax attack as early as 1999 [10].

Similarly with the COVID-19 attack, people high in government anticipated the COVID-19 attack [12,13] several years before the attack took place [10]. There is even data that an effort was made in 2018 to protect certain populations against COVID-19 by immunizing them with MMR vaccine [14]. In such a hostile government environment, the citizens need to individually evaluate the science of immunization with COVID-19 vaccines and not rely on philosophical arguments propagated by government officials. In this case there is no scientific evidence that the COVID-19 vaccines improve the health of the individual, much less of the population as a whole. Mass immunization with COVID-19 vaccines is certainly leading to a catastrophic public health event

AND LET ME ADD THIS: This is from John Roskam at the IPA. Quite fascinating, specially the date!

(As it happens on just this point a few days ago an IPA member emailed a link to a news story on the SBS from August 2017 – this is what the story said:

A NSW Health report confirms 35,727 cases of the flu have been detected in NSW residents so far in 2017, compared to last year’s 12 months record of 35,538… The highest number of cases in a year so far was in 2015, with more than 100,000 recorded. The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners’ Dr Bastian Seidel says the lab-confirmed cases are just a small part of the story. ‘Every year, we are seeing 300,000 Australians who do contract the flu. 180,000 of them are going to be admitted to hospital because of complications and unfortunately 3,000 Australians will die from complications of influenza.’

Professor Rawlinson, the virologist says, while no-one is immune from contracting the flu, some people are more likely to have a serious reaction. ‘People with diabetes, people with chronic heart or lung disease, people who’ve received transplants, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders who are particularly over the age of 50, as well as elderly people – and they’re defined as over 65 – those are at the risk of more severe illness.)

(As it happens on just this point a few days ago an IPA member emailed a link to a news story on the SBS from August 2017 – this is what the story said:

A NSW Health report confirms 35,727 cases of the flu have been detected in NSW residents so far in 2017, compared to last year’s 12 months record of 35,538… The highest number of cases in a year so far was in 2015, with more than 100,000 recorded. The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners’ Dr Bastian Seidel says the lab-confirmed cases are just a small part of the story. ‘Every year, we are seeing 300,000 Australians who do contract the flu. 180,000 of them are going to be admitted to hospital because of complications and unfortunately 3,000 Australians will die from complications of influenza.’

Professor Rawlinson, the virologist says, while no-one is immune from contracting the flu, some people are more likely to have a serious reaction. ‘People with diabetes, people with chronic heart or lung disease, people who’ve received transplants, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders who are particularly over the age of 50, as well as elderly people – and they’re defined as over 65 – those are at the risk of more severe illness.)

1 thought on ““There is no scientific evidence that the COVID-19 vaccines improve the health of the individual”

  1. Pingback: “There is no scientific evidence that the COVID-19 vaccines improve the health of the individual” - The Rabbit Hole

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.