What would a psychologist know about psychology?

You would like to think that someone trained in psychology would actually know something valuable about how the mind works and how to assist people with obvious psychological problems. You would like to think so, but the evidence is quite thin on the ground. Which brings me to this review of a book that has just been published, titled: Why Americans Are Suckers for Quick Fixes From Psychologists. I’m not sure slow fixes are any better, but this is from the review.

“The goal of this book is to explain why we keep falling for the ideas that psychologists tell us about the ways they’re going to help fix society,” says Jesse Singal, author of The Quick Fix: Why Fad Psychology Can’t Cure Our Social Ills. “They’ll offer some incredible new way to fight racism or to improve education or to improve gender equity in the workplace. There’s a rush of attention and often a rush of research dollars. Everyone gets really into them. There’s the NPR, New York Times coverage. And then a few years later, more research comes out. We realize the idea was barely true, if that, and it ends up having wasted a lot of time.”

Singal shows how the underlying research that propelled phenomena such as “power posing” (which promised to empower women by changing their posture), the self-esteem movement (which tried to reform poorly performing students and even criminals through enthusiastic, unearned praise), and the Implicit Association Test (which purports to measure “unconscious bias” against blacks and other marginalized groups) often can’t be replicated and sometimes doesn’t even measure what it purports to address.

“Just by dint of our brains, we’re always going to be susceptible to less-than-rigorous, monocausal accounts of a lot of our problems,” says Singal, who writes for outlets such as New YorkThe Atlantic, and Reason and co-hosts the podcast Blocked and Reported. But, he tells Nick Gillespie, by laying out the predictable ways in which research goes from the lab to the media to the culture and politics, he hopes to sharpen our critical faculties and improve our media literacy.

There are no psychological problems that come with a clear etiology. Most of it is made up as you go along. The evidence has been pretty limited that anyone is helped by therapy, and certainly its track record is no better than any placebo. Misery often comes with life and the only cure I have ever seen is someone else cares about what happens to you and that the person who cares about you is someone you care about as well. The misery of course does not go away but some of the burden is lifted. Some.

1 thought on “What would a psychologist know about psychology?

  1. Pingback: What would a psychologist know about psychology? - The Rabbit Hole

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.