Defending the defensible

Here some lunatic defends General Pinochet in public. Well we all know what sort of person he must be. But what caught my eye were these two comments. The first one about the present:

But just to see how bad things have gotten in Chile: The Communist Party is back in power, and the Justice system keeps in jail veteran soldiers of the fight against the insurgents. To do this, the “Justice” system simply ignores an Amnesty Law form 1978 still valid and which covered both military and insurgents. And it also created out of thin air the category of “permanent hijacking”, for the disappeared during the regime. According to this, the old men languishing in jail still keep those disappeared who knows where. To these soldiers no benefit is given: they will stay in jail until they die. And there is a movement to put them in prison wih the general population, strip them of their ranks and their pensions. The revenge of the left is relentless. Right now, a judge is investigating the murder, in an encounter with police and secret service agents, of the head of the terrorist organization MIR in October 1974. He is accusing the agents of murder. It would be like bringing murder charges against the Navy Team that killed Osama Bin Laden. The main erson accused of so “dastardly” deed of ridding the wortld of this scum, is an officer of the army who has Russian roots, Miguel Krasnoff. Meanwhile, the head of the Communist Party, who plotted an assasination attempt against Pinochet in which several of his gurads were killed, and for which he is very proud, was recently cleared of any charges when a group of the widows of such guards brought forward an accusation. The judges applied of course the statutes of limitation, something the brave men who fought the communist takeover are being denied.

And then a reminder about the past:

What people don’t know: the socialist Allende won with a minority of votes, because the majority vote was split between the two conservative candidates. (There was no second round at that time.) Allende illegally took private industries for his own people to control, ruining the country’s economy. People even lacked food, thus the “pots and pans” march of middle-class women (which feminists hate, and never mention). Demonstrators in the cities were viciously attacked by communist gangs. Shopkeepers were attacked, the people terrorized to pacify them – the usual preparations for a communist takeover. When the communists (most of them non-Whites) were sentenced and imprisoned, Allende illegally let them out in the streets again. Thousands of times. The communist party trained guerrilla warfare in Cuba, and Cuban advisors, guns, ammo and explosives were smuggled in to Chile. It is known that people in the top of the government facilitated this – perhaps Allende himself. Finally the Senate and the Supreme Court formally asked the military to remove the president, listing his many crimes in a long letter. General Pinochet carried out their request. The communist takeover was stopped. (Sometimes brutally? Yes, it’s South America. And the communists had terrorized the people for years.) Allende committed suicide with his Soviet-made Kalashnikov. Pinochet let a Nobel Prize-winning economist fix the economy. Under Pinochet, Chile prospered and continued to do so after him. He promised to only rule for a while and then step aside for democracy – which is exactly what he did. Most Chileans LOVE Pinochet. Something the media hide from Westerners. The media and other leftists wanted Chile to become another communist dictatorship. The Chileans disagreed.

Around the same time we had our own take down of the Prime Minister via the Governor-General. All very constitutional here but the downside wasn’t quite in Allende territory either. And if you are interested in the kind of destructive potential an Allende has, just have a look at Venezuela right now.

Picked up at Captain Capitalism

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.