This is now treated everywhere like fact, How US covered up Saudi role in 911. And there are, it is said, 28 pages of secret analysis that spell it out.

In its report on the still-censored “28 pages” implicating the Saudi government in 9/11, “60 Minutes” last weekend said the Saudi role in the attacks has been “soft-pedaled” to protect America’s delicate alliance with the oil-rich kingdom.

The New York Post and 60 Minutes are reporting this so why is it not absolutely at the top of every news report every day everywhere in the world? Here’s more:

Case agents I’ve interviewed at the Joint Terrorism Task Forces in Washington and San Diego, the forward operating base for some of the Saudi hijackers, as well as detectives at the Fairfax County (Va.) Police Department who also investigated several 9/11 leads, say virtually every road led back to the Saudi Embassy in Washington, as well as the Saudi Consulate in Los Angeles. . . .

Those sources say the pages missing from the 9/11 congressional inquiry report — which comprise the entire final chapter dealing with “foreign support for the September 11 hijackers” — details “incontrovertible evidence” gathered from both CIA and FBI case files of official Saudi assistance for at least two of the Saudi hijackers who settled in San Diego.

It defies understanding that the entire government of the United States would suppress such information, and then not just punish the Saudis but attack Iraq, its largest enemy in the Middle East. Why there is no bi-partisan clamour for those 28 pages is beyond me, since you would at least think there is Democrat advantage in attacking a Republican President. Or for the media who hated the War, or for Obama who made his name by not going along with the attacks on Iraq. And no outright denial, but silence.